The Accurate Reloading Forums
no words.....mangled Jeffery. :(

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/760101804/m/6881036011

03 June 2009, 16:24
tendrams
no words.....mangled Jeffery. :(
http://www.gunsinternational.c...cfm?gun_id=100085580

Ruger scope mounts? SERIOUSLY?
03 June 2009, 16:33
jerry mcdonald
That has got to be the work of someone that is the direct product of at least 200 years of straight inbreeding!
03 June 2009, 20:49
DuggaBoye
You know it's funny, despite my love of English craftsmanship, I have seen more than a few "custom" mounts come out of England on auction rifles that were greater abominations than this.
One I recall in particular was grafted on to o very nice Mannlicher-Schoenauer wrecking an otherwise collectible piece.
Another was "applied" to an Evans.
Both were crude, yet sturdy mounts that worked effectively while destroying the weapons value.


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
03 June 2009, 20:53
tendrams
Well, as they say..."there is nothing quite so permanent as a decent temporary repair". Given another century, that Ruger mount would probably hold up better than the remainder of the rifle.

rotflmo
03 June 2009, 21:18
foxhound
You know, the way I figure it, not all guns or women are unspoiled virgins with no miles or baggage, but that still leaves an awful lot of qualities to be admired, enjoyed , appreciated and utilized! Hopefully someone will get a good deal out of the despoiling....


DRSS
04 June 2009, 17:19
dirklawyer
Yes the mount is not pretty but the major problem I see with this WR is the LOP which my 10 year old daughter could use and the rifle is two pounds too heavy, it's a pig, with scope your looking at a 10.5 pounds in a 333, that's the reason I would not give this rifle a second look.


"An individual with experience is never at the mercies of an individual with an argument"
04 June 2009, 19:09
tendrams
quote:
year old daughter could use and the rifle is two pounds too heavy, it's a pig, with scope your looking at a 10.5 pounds in a 333, that's the reason I would not give this rifle a second look.



I also wish the LOP were 14.5 with original butt-plate. I wonder if some of the weight comes from a recoil reducer perhaps installed when they installed the scope mount and recoil pad.
05 June 2009, 20:02
SXS
I just weighed my Jeffery .333 grade 4. It comes in at 9# even, the same weight as my Evans .375. The Jeffery feels lighter because the weight is more evenly distributed between your hands.

There are more than a few reasons to avoid this rifle. Although described as "original finish" a close look at the photos reveals stock wood with missing bits, and considerably under the metal. The metal to metal fit is very poor because of indifferent re-polishing, and a re-color that doesn't even come close to what original colors should look like. I would want to examine the action very closely to determine if any distortion occured when colored. This is truly a "mangled Jeffery".
Best of luck, SXS
07 June 2009, 07:48
Idaho Sharpshooter
there is a special place in Hell for people who do things like this...

Rich
Buff Killer