THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM DOUBLE RIFLES FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Good .450/.400 CEB Load?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted
Any one have a good .450/.400 load for the CEB .409 bullets (solids or non-cons)? My Searcy is regulated for 82 grains of IMR 4831, F215 and 400 grain Woodleigh SN. Trying to come up with a good load for the Searcy using the CEB bullets. Thanks.


Mike
 
Posts: 21826 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Mike Brooks
posted Hide Post
Sam told me to go with the load that works already. I'm going to back off a few grains and see how it works.
I haven't done it yet `cause it's too chilly here.


NRA Life
ASSRA Life
DRSS

Today's Quote:
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a free cell phone with free monthly minutes, food stamps, section 8 housing, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
 
Posts: 4096 | Location: Cherkasy Ukraine  | Registered: 19 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
So far most guns will shoot well using CEBs and the that regulates with the same weight bullet.
 
Posts: 2837 | Location: NC | Registered: 08 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
And use the same powder charge with the non-cons even though the bullet is lighter?


Mike
 
Posts: 21826 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of CCMDoc
posted Hide Post
That's been my experience with CEB solids and Non-cons - same powder and charge, same place even though Non-cons are lighter.

I'll dig out my 450/400 data and send it to you when I find it.


NRA Lifer; DSC Lifer; SCI member; DRSS; AR member since November 9 2003

Don't Save the best for last, the smile for later or the "Thanks" for tomorow
 
Posts: 3465 | Location: In the Shadow of Griffin&Howe | Registered: 24 November 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of CCMDoc
posted Hide Post
Mjines,
PM sent


NRA Lifer; DSC Lifer; SCI member; DRSS; AR member since November 9 2003

Don't Save the best for last, the smile for later or the "Thanks" for tomorow
 
Posts: 3465 | Location: In the Shadow of Griffin&Howe | Registered: 24 November 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
And use the same powder charge with the non-cons even though the bullet is lighter?


Mike,

That's correct. I think the theory is that the solids and NCs are the same length and same bearing surface area which evidently are more important than the actual weight. It's worked that way so far in my 9.3 and 500.
 
Posts: 8531 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia