The Accurate Reloading Forums
SWift A-Frames

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/760101804/m/2961052111

13 June 2009, 01:51
retreever
SWift A-Frames
Anyone ever loaded Swift A Frames soft popints in there doubles???

Mike


Michael Podwika... DRSS bigbores and hunting www.pvt.co.za " MAKE THE SHOT " 450#2 Famars
13 June 2009, 02:12
Ed Scarboro
Yes, I have loaded 500gr swifts in 470NE Merkel. I loaded 86gr of RL15 with a #2 Kynoch wad and 215M primers. My normal load for woodleigh soft nose is 87gr of RL15 and everything else the same. I have shot 2" groups at 50yds and 4" groups at 100yds with them.
13 June 2009, 04:30
new_guy
They shoot great in my 400.




www.heymusa.com


HSC Booth # 306
SCI Booth # 3947
13 June 2009, 06:33
N E 450 No2
Retriever they are the best shooting bullet in my 450 No2.

I have shot several cape buff and an eland with them [500gr], and with 480gr Woodleigh Softs's.

Recovered bullets have expanded perfectly and seem to penetrate just a little bit deeper than the Woodleigh.

I use the same powder charge for all of them 88gr of RL 15, with filler of course.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
13 June 2009, 07:08
ozhunter
Some say the solid Partition section of the A- Frame might cause problems with a Doubles barrels.
13 June 2009, 08:30
dirklawyer
I would shoot nothing else in a DR BUT Swift has not released the 570 grain soft they are making for the 500N.E. Swift's are slightly harder so you drop your loads 1-3 grains like a solid verses soft and it should regulate very well with other softs. IMO a Swift bullet will not harm an older DR, they're not harder than steel jacketed Woody.


"An individual with experience is never at the mercies of an individual with an argument"
13 June 2009, 13:15
Tim Carney
Used exclusively the 225 gr. swift A-frame in my now sold .350 Rigby No. 2 double. Good accuracy and great performance on the big antelope, notably gemsbok.

Regards
13 June 2009, 18:22
new_guy
quote:
Originally posted by dirklawyer:
Swift's are slightly harder so you drop your loads 1-3 grains...


That's my experience too, but Mike Brady told me that it wasn't because they were harder but because they were softer.


www.heymusa.com


HSC Booth # 306
SCI Booth # 3947
14 June 2009, 04:37
dirklawyer
quote:
Originally posted by new_guy:
quote:
Originally posted by dirklawyer:
Swift's are slightly harder so you drop your loads 1-3 grains...


That's my experience too, but Mike Brady told me that it wasn't because they were harder but because they were softer.


Chris, I don't know about them being softer, I actually think the primary reason might be that the bearing surface of the Swift's is greater than most other soft's so more pressure, anyway I like em a lot if you don't know by now.


"An individual with experience is never at the mercies of an individual with an argument"
14 June 2009, 04:52
500N
quote:
Originally posted by dirklawyer:
quote:
Originally posted by new_guy:
quote:
Originally posted by dirklawyer:
Swift's are slightly harder so you drop your loads 1-3 grains...


That's my experience too, but Mike Brady told me that it wasn't because they were harder but because they were softer.


Chris, I don't know about them being softer, I actually think the primary reason might be that the bearing surface of the Swift's is greater than most other soft's so more pressure, anyway I like em a lot if you don't know by now.



I agree.

I also don't think they are tapered like or as much as Woodleigh's.