5MB IBM Hard Drive in 1956
Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
I had to return a Seagate 500Gb hard drive. It had 7200.11 on the original, which was a thick and heavy item. I got back one with 7200.12 on it, which was a thin and lightweight item. My computer guru tells me what I got back is a piece of junk. I'd send it back and get what I originally had, but dealing with them without having a fistful of numbers and the patience of Job is most likely a waste of time. In future, I will buy only Western Digital. I've never had a problem with a WD. I post this for your benefit. Take it or leave it... | ||
|
One of Us |
The Seagate 7200.11 HDD';s have an evil reputation. The 7200.12 might actually be better. Frankly I don't trust ANY Seagate Drive made in CHINA for other than "static " (powered down) backup use and I generally only buy WD HDD's New. AD If I provoke you into thinking then I've done my good deed for the day! Those who manage to provoke themselves into other activities have only themselves to blame. *We Band of 45-70er's* 35 year Life Member of the NRA NRA Life Member since 1984 | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia