THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Small Calibers    Charging, raging angry cape buffalo with a .223.
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Charging, raging angry cape buffalo with a .223.
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Claret_Dabbler
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by carpetman1:
Brian (Claret Dabbler)--You are correct that the deer was paralyzed. Bow hunters frequently wait half hour or so to give a wounded deer a chance to bleed to death. I would classify that as at leisure. In this case the deer was approached immediately after shot and dispatched as fast as possible. I wouldn't call that leisure. Now my question to you is what gun will always kill instantly? Frankly I have seen many deer shot with several different chamberings and seen them hit many different places and I can't come up with any combination that kills instantly EVERYTIME. You never know till you have pulled the trigger. The deer I shot last year with a .243 had both his heart and liver pulverized, but still walked several feet and stood on it's feet for half minute or so. If you have the answer please post. The shame would be if the deer ran off crippled. The shame also appears to be someone with limited or possibly no experience is trying to make a case when there is none.


Carpetman, I am well aware that there is no guarantee that a well placed shot with an adequate calibre will result in a bang flop on a deer. However, if the chest cavity is disrupted with an decent deer bullet, that beast will bled out and loose consciousness in a very short time.

A spine shot with a small calibre is no way to treat any animal.

As to my limited experience, no doubt my experience is limited compared to some of the guys on the Euro forum who shoot large numbers of game. I don't keep score, but I shoot a few deer every year, 10 this year of three species I think. I could not swear my lifetime score has passed the 100 mark, but it must be close.


Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not out to get you....
 
Posts: 1484 | Location: Northern Ireland | Registered: 19 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Teancum--I don't recall ever reading a single post on this subject where a good shot was made and the results were bad. I've read stuff like it was shot with a hornet, (for example) and never again. No details as to where hit. I do have one experience that was bad, but the facts strictly speculation. That was a spike buck that both my grandson and I shot with a .243 using cast bullets. I fully believe (very well could be wrong) that the deer was hit in what should have been a fatal spot---but did run off with no blood found. I'll not risk doing that again and do regret ever doing it.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For goodness sakes, I sometimes wonder that if we were to shoot them with nerf balls, some here would complain that we're scaring the poor little darlin's.
I don't know about ya'll, but I harvest crops, not animals. I kill animals. Every hog I shoot, whether I use a 22 hornet or a 458 lott, I make a spine shot, sever the spinal cord and they're DRT. They paddle for a minute and go nowhere. No tracking or lost animal involved. Do the same on deer quite often.
Then I skin them, dismember them, evenutally roast their flesh and eat them.
If that's to insensitive, maybe you ought to take up golf or knitting.
GWB
 
Posts: 23752 | Location: Pearland, Tx,, USA | Registered: 10 September 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Brian (Clarett Dabbler) Your experience level is more than I expected--I was incorrect on the call on that. Please define for me what is an adequate caliber and a decent deer bullet. My experience has been if chest cavity is disrupted with any caliber the deer will bleed out. I've also seen spine shots kill faster than chest cavity shots???? What's the difference in a chest cavity shot deer that takes awhile to bleed out and one that is spine shot and promptly finished off?
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of WhatThe
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TEANCUM:
quote:
But many here base their opinion on their own experience which gives them more reason the believe in their statements that much more.



What is more interesting is that some of the above base their opinion on NO EXPERIENCE at all just their highly held beliefs. They will proudly proclaim that they have never nor will they ever take a deer with a .223. A self declaration of their lack of experience. No in the field experience.

While citing the need to read more magazines is dubious advice at best, you would find some of those "stab and blast" writers are recognizing a new line of bullets being made to fit the market share of those hunters who wish to take deer with a .223.

Not questionable at all to those who have EXPERIENCE in the field with the caliber. Sorry.

shame


I'm not here to debate something I have little experience with, I'm only debating the "discussion" itself. For you, like carpetman1, have developed a zone in which you have had success with your .223's. I have no reason to disbelieve you, argue with you or otherwise, you've been there and done that. On the other hand, there are folks that have had bad experiences using the .223 and find the caliber/cartridge an unwise choice. Now, they may have taken a 500 yard hip shot, used an inadequate bullet etc., While they might say you took a 50 yard head shot etc,. So I don't have any reason to disbelieve any stories and I will simply call the cartridge "questionable" and let the debate go on. And again, if it works for you, you're happy, then don't let anyone rain on your parade and continue doing what feels right!
 
Posts: 542 | Location: So. Cal | Registered: 31 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of TEANCUM
posted Hide Post
I hear references in some of these posting about folks who have had bad experiences with the .223, but don't see a lot of those posts showing up on these subjects lines.

You do see a lot of posts here on this board about those who use the .223 tailored to their needs, and find that it works out just fine with wonderful results.

The anti's seem to be a lot of references to non existent facts..............

shame
 
Posts: 1788 | Location: IDAHO | Registered: 12 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If its legal to hunt with a 223 where you live, then it dosent matter what others think.
 
Posts: 67 | Registered: 13 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Oddbod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Claret_Dabbler:



A spine shot with a small calibre is no way to treat any animal.



You make that sound as if the spine shot was intentional.
How is a spine shot with say, a .300WSM any different?
Still doesn't kill & requires a 9mm through the brain to do that.

Once again you are someone arguing caliber when shot placement is the issue.
 
Posts: 610 | Location: Cumbria, UK | Registered: 09 July 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Small Calibers    Charging, raging angry cape buffalo with a .223.

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia