THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Help out with?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Just got off phone with friend. He asked what do I think about 223 or 22-250 for deer? I told him I'd go for a bigger caliber, He insisted on 223. The reason, he wants his wife to start putting in for a tag and just maybe she'll draw and hunt,it takes atleast 4yrs to draw if lucky sooner. Remember we got mule deer in my area and 223 is legal for oregon.the weight ranges any where from 200 to 300+ pounds occasionally. Shots could range from bowhunting shots to whatever? If this is what he decides I told him to get a fast twist barrell. Did I tell him right?
 
Posts: 537 | Location: S.E. Oregon | Registered: 27 January 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Mort Canard
posted Hide Post
We just had a big knock down drag out argument for the last couple of months about the smallest caliber adequate for deer. See: http://forums.accuratereloadin.../6711043/m/465104989

You will probably find more than enough to keep you reading for quite a while.

Personally I think deer deserve at least a 25 caliber rifle.


*******************************************************
For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction.
 
Posts: 567 | Location: Kansas | Registered: 02 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Von Gruff
posted Hide Post
I twice used a 22-250 for deer hunting and the first time under ideal conditions it worked well, BUT the second day I was in a situation that precluded me taking a shot as the deer was facing directly away from me feeding with the head over a small log. At 80 yds I waited for the head to come up but a wind swirl had an imediate effect. The head came up AS it jumped, one bound and it was in the bush. A heavier cal would have let me take a shot that I would expect to reach the vitals from this end of the deer. While a 22 cal might be legal it is not ideal. Deer calibers start at 25 and 28 is better, these are easy enough to shoot for even the most recoil sensative.
Von Gruff


Von Gruff.

http://www.vongruffknives.com/

Gen 12: 1-3

Exodus 20:1-17

Acts 4:10-12


 
Posts: 2694 | Location: South Otago New Zealand. | Registered: 08 February 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Try a .243. Women are not that fragile. Get out to the range alot and she'll get used to it in no time.
 
Posts: 87 | Location: lehigh co. pa. | Registered: 07 March 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mort Canard:
We just had a big knock down drag out argument for the last couple of months about the smallest caliber adequate for deer. See: http://forums.accuratereloadin.../6711043/m/465104989

I agree mort. they deserve nothing less than a quarter bore. Not saying it cant be done with less, but I dont feel comfortable with less than a 100 grain pill, and prefer a 120 myself.

You will probably find more than enough to keep you reading for quite a while.

Personally I think deer deserve at least a 25 caliber rifle.
 
Posts: 554 | Location: CT | Registered: 17 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 303Guy
posted Hide Post
I would suggest a 260 Rem. No, women are not that fragile at all! It's the weight of the rifle that might get her down. The weight of the rifle gets me down! Well, it did until I 'invented' a real neat (for me) way of carrying mine around. (It leaves me with both hands free - I would post a picture I but cannot aim the camera back at myself!)


Regards
303Guy
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 October 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 303Guy:
I would suggest a 260 Rem. No, women are not that fragile at all! It's the weight of the rifle that might get her down. The weight of the rifle gets me down! Well, it did until I 'invented' a real neat (for me) way of carrying mine around. (It leaves me with both hands free - I would post a picture I but cannot aim the camera back at myself!)


Take a picture of yourself in the mirror
unless, of course, you have no reflection.
 
Posts: 13978 | Location: http://www.tarawaontheweb.org/tarawa2.jpg | Registered: 03 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
it takes FOUR YEARS for someone to draw a tag there?

Remind me not to EVER consider living there....

AD


If I provoke you into thinking then I've done my good deed for the day!
Those who manage to provoke themselves into other activities have only themselves to blame.

*We Band of 45-70er's*

35 year Life Member of the NRA

NRA Life Member since 1984
 
Posts: 4601 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 21 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I am the happy owner of a Savage model 340 in .222. I also have a quantity of the Winchester 64 grain pp bullet that I have used on coyotes, feral dogs, and Cougars. If the Roberts wasn't with me, I believe that the triple-deuce would do the job on a mule deer. I have never shot a deer at over 75 yards, by the way. If she is bound and determined to use a .223, tell her to keep shooting until it stops moving.
A friend of mine, long ago, dropped a doe at about 25 yards with a 25-20. Hit her in the brain, dead upon arrival on the ground. Back in the hungry thirties, my grandfather killed three does with three rounds out of a 25-35. Again, he was close.
If she were to practice and get pretty good with that thing, I'd say that she'll bring home the venison !
 
Posts: 420 | Location: Boise, Idaho | Registered: 08 November 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2025 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia