THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
6,5mm heavy game bullets
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Some time ago I posted a question as to the biggest game taken with a non-magnum 6,5mm.
I'm curious to know which bullets and which bullet weights you prefer for the bigger animals shooting a 6,5.

Should you take one for plains game in Africa, what would you suggest (up to, but not including Eland)?

- Lars/Finland


A.k.a. Bwana One-Shot
 
Posts: 556 | Location: Finland | Registered: 07 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Lars, my friend and I hunted in Namibia in September. He was using a Sako finnlight in 6.5x55 handloaded with 140gr Accubonds.
Everything he shot never moved off the spot and that included oryx and kudu. Having said that, Ross is a very good shot and his shot placement was textbook.
It was the first time I'd seen the Swede used on game and it impressed the hell out of me.
 
Posts: 351 | Location: Junee, NSW, Australia | Registered: 13 June 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
You asked so here's my $0.02 worth.

IMO one of the best all time Big Game bullets outa 6.5mm; either a 55 or 57(R) is the Hornady 160 gr. Round Nose - period.

They aren't speedy but if you put one in the right spot they work like the Hammer of Thor.


Cheers,

Number 10
 
Posts: 3433 | Location: Frankfurt, Germany | Registered: 23 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of londonhunter
posted Hide Post
I agree
There is something about those 160's

They drop things like a nothing this side of 9.3's

I would compare the them to a brand new no 4 surgical blade

A surgical kill in most cases
 
Posts: 1661 | Location: London | Registered: 14 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by londonhunter:
I agree
There is something about those 160's

They drop things like a nothing this side of 9.3's

I would compare the them to a brand new no 4 surgical blade
tu2X3 but also include the 160 Norma RN and the original ,original Barnes 156 PSP. These were used in the 6.5x.284, 6.5x55 and the 6.5 Carcano. beer
A surgical kill in most cases


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 900 SS
posted Hide Post
The thing about the 6,5x55 on bigger game is that when you pull out a nicely mushroomed bullet, the unexpanded part of the bullet still is as long as many decent hunting bullets in bigger calibers.

For cup and core bullets of the same material and cup thickness, as the caliber goes from big to small its like going part of the way between lead- to copperbullets.

The only certain bulletfailure I have seen was a long 6,5 that angled 90 degrees upwards on impact.
 
Posts: 408 | Location: Bardu, Norway | Registered: 25 August 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ChopperGuy
posted Hide Post
My wife used her 6.5x55 loaded with factory Lapua Mega 150 grain bullets to take a really nice blue wildebeast in RSA a few years ago.

Not a big fan of those bullets, but they did kill it right where it stood.

Of course, whe's a good shot and put it right where it needed to go. What more can you ask of a bullet?


______________________
Guns are like parachutes. If you need one and don't have one, you'll likely never need one again Author Unknown, But obviously brilliant.

If you are in trouble anywhere in the world, an airplane can fly over and drop flowers, but a helicopter can land and save your life. - Igor Sikorski, 1947
 
Posts: 681 | Location: Spring Branch, TX (Summers in Northern MN) | Registered: 18 September 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of scottfromdallas
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gerry:
You asked so here's my $0.02 worth.

IMO one of the best all time Big Game bullets outa 6.5mm; either a 55 or 57(R) is the Hornady 160 gr. Round Nose - period.

They aren't speedy but if you put one in the right spot they work like the Hammer of Thor.


Do they still make them in .264? I know they are on the website but I don't see them listed in any of the online sites like Midway, Grafs & Natchez. I see the .268 is still listed.



 
Posts: 1941 | Location: Texas | Registered: 19 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Fury01
posted Hide Post
I would like to know the answer to that as well so I sent a note to Hornady.
I sure hope they did not cease to be...
dmw


"The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights."
~George Washington - 1789
 
Posts: 2135 | Location: Where God breathes life into the Amber Waves of Grain and owns the cattle on a thousand hills. | Registered: 20 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In 1987 I took 2 rifles to Botswana, Winchester 70s in 375 H&H and 6.5x55. Except for the warthog, I shot all of my game with the 6.5x55 using Norma 156 grain factory loads. All were 1-shot kills at ranges out to 250+/- yards. I did shoot the eland 3 times, but each of the 3 bullets would have been fatal. As you may know, elands are big, tough, animals, so I kept shooting until it was down. I did study the anatemy of the game that I was hunting, so that I knew where to aim to break the shoulders with the 6.5x55. My PH was a little reluctent about me shooting the 6.5x55 until he was comfortable with my ability to shoot it.

If I go to Africa to shoot plains game again, I think that I'd bring a 9.3x62 and either a 7x57 or a 6.5x55.

JEff
 
Posts: 993 | Location: Omaha, NE, USA | Registered: 11 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 260remguy:
In 1987 I took 2 rifles to Botswana, Winchester 70s in 375 H&H and 6.5x55. Except for the warthog, I shot all of my game with the 6.5x55 using Norma 156 grain factory loads. All were 1-shot kills at ranges out to 250+/- yards. I did shoot the eland 3 times, but each of the 3 bullets would have been fatal. As you may know, elands are big, tough, animals, so I kept shooting until it was down. I did study the anatemy of the game that I was hunting, so that I knew where to aim to break the shoulders with the 6.5x55. My PH was a little reluctent about me shooting the 6.5x55 until he was comfortable with my ability to shoot it.

If I go to Africa to shoot plains game again, I think that I'd bring a 9.3x62 and either a 7x57 or a 6.5x55.

JEff


Fascinating!

May I ask which animals you took, Jeff?

I have taken Eland at a lazered 199yds w/ a .30-06 and 180grs Speer Grand Slam - the Eland fell nicely enough for me to be convinced that even a smaller caliber would have done the job. However, given the size of Eland I sure would be cautious about smaller calibers especially if the distance is beyond 100yds.

I could not agree more on the point of shooting until the animal is down. I have learned this the hard way, I'm afraid.

Also the anatomy handbooks are useful, indeed. Shot placement, as we know...

- Lars/Finland


A.k.a. Bwana One-Shot
 
Posts: 556 | Location: Finland | Registered: 07 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of scottfromdallas
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ChopperGuy:
My wife used her 6.5x55 loaded with factory Lapua Mega 150 grain bullets to take a really nice blue wildebeast in RSA a few years ago.

Not a big fan of those bullets, but they did kill it right where it stood.


Chopperguy,

Anything you can share on why you aren't a big fan of the Mega? I've only used it on one deer but had a good experience. My rifle shoots them well so it would be nice to hear from someone that has more experience with them.



 
Posts: 1941 | Location: Texas | Registered: 19 July 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Do they still make them in .264?

Scott,

Yeah, I looked at the Hornady website and they're still listed.

Here in the Fatherland they are quite commonly avaiable and I grab a Box or 2 at every opportunity. I load them for several hunting Buddies; one a 6.5x55 Mauser bolt rifle that is an absolute Tack-Driver and the others all loaded in 6.5x57R Drillings.

Still got a coupla boxes in the basement.

Having siad that; they aren't really a current, Spitzer-shaped, sexy-type bullet (Eye of the Beholder .....) and probably not a big mover as a SKU for Sellers.

Pretty much every other 6.5x55 shooter I know load Nosler Ballistic Tips.


Cheers,

Number 10
 
Posts: 3433 | Location: Frankfurt, Germany | Registered: 23 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by londonhunter:
I agree
There is something about those 160's

They drop things like a nothing this side of 9.3's

I would compare the them to a brand new no 4 surgical blade

A surgical kill in most cases



There is something about really high sectional densities relating to terminal performance that some are so reluctant to accept. Here is an example of a cartridge and caliber that is nothing spectacular on paper but manages to outperform larger calibers and has been doing it for over a century. All bullets can kill but the longer ones always kill better and more consistently regardless of caliber.


Captain Finlander
 
Posts: 480 | Registered: 03 September 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Schauckis,
Here are two threads over at 24Hr. Campfire that you might be interested in..
First up a thread on 6.5 bullet testing (part 2)..
Note in the first post a link to the first test (part 1)
http://www.24hourcampfire.com/...ullet_test_Part_Deux
The 120gr. and 130gr. Barnes bullets penetrated deeper that any of the other bullets..

From this thread:
http://www.24hourcampfire.com/...php/topics/3334246/1
Posted by GregR
Last month, I took my family to hunt in South Africa. My kids (9 and 10) are tiny (55 and 62 pounds), so they use a chopped off (16.5" barrel) .260 A-Bolt stoked with Federal's new 120-grain TSX load. They took 7 animals with it, including a zebra, 2 kudu, impala, blesbok, caracal, and duiker. My daughter dropped the kudu with one perfect shot that blew right through both shoulders from 120 yards.

My son shot everything else. All required just one shot except the kudu, which needed a finisher because, although his elevation was perfect for a broadside shot, it was a little too low because of the sharp downhill angle. The bullet entered for a perfect heart shot but blew out the bottom of the chest, passing just under the heart.

No bullets were recovered, and only one failed to exit. That passed through a whole lot of zebra on a quartering shot at 208 yards and was lost somewhere in the stomach. The zebra ran a good ways, but was kind enough to tip over right next to the road. Internal damage from the tiny TSX was unbelievable.

One of my client's kids used their custom .260 to take another 7 animals, including 2 kudu and a blue wildebeest with similar results.

Just for the record, we had folks shooting various .300s and a 7mm magnum in camp who had to make a hell of a lot of follow-up shots on even smaller animals. Big guns also accounted for the only wounded-and-lost critter of the 60-odd animals our group shot. We had no such trouble with kids shooting the little .260.
_________________________
Greg Rodriguez
Global Adventure Outfitters, Inc.
www.mbogo.net
(281) 494-4151





 
Posts: 592 | Registered: 28 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A 260??? Nah, that can't be right....

Everybody knows you need a magnum driving unobtainium bullets at light speed to blow holes through that 'African armour'.

A lowly 260 is incapable, surely....... Smiler
 
Posts: 351 | Location: Junee, NSW, Australia | Registered: 13 June 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Fury01
posted Hide Post
I called Hornady and they say, "discontinued."
Very sadly me thinks.
dmw


"The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights."
~George Washington - 1789
 
Posts: 2135 | Location: Where God breathes life into the Amber Waves of Grain and owns the cattle on a thousand hills. | Registered: 20 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 6.5BR
posted Hide Post
Alot of good choices for heavier game w/140-160s, yet if one looks over those extensive test results, they might conclude a Barnes 120/130 will handle most any game at sane ranges - when steered thru vitals.

A 129 Hornady SP (not SST) will hang right w/125 partition in terminal performance. The 140 PT is a good one, perhaps not quite as accurate.

Currently, my go to bullets will be 130 Accubonds for deer and would not hesitate for elk or moose. For a bear or any african game, a Barnes TSX/TTSX would get the nod and I'd not hesitate to drive from any angle....as I would a good 156-160 from a Swede up to modest distances.

The 125-130 class is 'right sized' for short actioned rounds though most will do nicely thru 142s when desired - albeit perhaps w/slightly compromised case capacity, assumed twisted properly.
 
Posts: 2898 | Registered: 25 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Fury01
posted Hide Post
6.5BR,
Indeed there are plenty of choices in the 6.5 Frame as you described. I have quite a few in the bullet box.
But: they are not the 160 Grain RN that made the 6.5 in the last 100 years. So for me it is "sadly." There is nothing quite looking at that long RN bullet sitting in the case for me. Just a personal thing.
dmw


"The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights."
~George Washington - 1789
 
Posts: 2135 | Location: Where God breathes life into the Amber Waves of Grain and owns the cattle on a thousand hills. | Registered: 20 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ChopperGuy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by scottfromdallas:
Chopperguy,

Anything you can share on why you aren't a big fan of the Mega? I've only used it on one deer but had a good experience. My rifle shoots them well so it would be nice to hear from someone that has more experience with them.


Our experience with them is they shed a lot more bullet weight than I'm used to seeing in other bullets I use. That's my only observation that I find hard to get used to.

Not saying they didn't take the game cleanly though.

Just a personal thing. I'd like to use something else in the same weight range and give them a try to compare with the Mega bullet results.

If I needed the 155 grain bullets again, I'd probably use them. Heck, my wife still has several boxes of them here for her hunting use.

My go to bullet for most game to northern deer size game is the 130 Sirocco II or Accubond. And like stated above, I'd even use them on elk if the chance came about with proper shot opportunities.


______________________
Guns are like parachutes. If you need one and don't have one, you'll likely never need one again Author Unknown, But obviously brilliant.

If you are in trouble anywhere in the world, an airplane can fly over and drop flowers, but a helicopter can land and save your life. - Igor Sikorski, 1947
 
Posts: 681 | Location: Spring Branch, TX (Summers in Northern MN) | Registered: 18 September 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
But: they are not the 160 Grain RN that made the 6.5 in the last 100 years. So for me it is "sadly." There is nothing quite looking at that long RN bullet sitting in the case for me. Just a personal thing.


dmw,

I'm mourning w/you .....
CRYBABY


Cheers,

Number 10
 
Posts: 3433 | Location: Frankfurt, Germany | Registered: 23 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Until it became ILLEGAL (with the introduction of a 2,450fps minimum velocity requirement) the 6.5mmx54MS with the big "pencil" 159 grain bullet was very popular in Scotland for hill stalking.

One of the benefits, the old stalkers will tell you, is that it was slow enough to be able to hear the bullet impact on the target animal.

So by that you usually knew that you had a good solid "thwack" of a hit or had back shot the animal in the gut with a "plop".

All of these old stalkers said that it was a sure killer if placed right.
 
Posts: 6823 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I shot 10 trophy animals; Eland, Gemsbok, Hartebeest, Impala(x2), Kudu, Springbok(x2), Warthog, and Wildebeest.

Except for the warthog, all of them were shot with the 6.5x55 156 grain Norma factory loads. The warthog was shot with the 375 H&H using old yellow box Winchester 270 grain ST factory loads.

JEff
 
Posts: 993 | Location: Omaha, NE, USA | Registered: 11 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
IN the general US market, you are going to have to get it done with a 140 grain bullet.

Hornady is going to can the 160 grain RN along with the 154 grain RN in 7mm for 2011...

my letter of complaint is already in their home office.
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Like the say in Hanover, "Vox clamantis in deserto!".

JEff
 
Posts: 993 | Location: Omaha, NE, USA | Registered: 11 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Fury01
posted Hide Post
Does anyone have experience with the 160 "round Tip" Hawk bullet in .264?
dmw


"The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights."
~George Washington - 1789
 
Posts: 2135 | Location: Where God breathes life into the Amber Waves of Grain and owns the cattle on a thousand hills. | Registered: 20 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
My little 6.5x47 with the Nosler 140 Partitions will just have to suffice.



Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 6.5BR
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fury01:
6.5BR,
Indeed there are plenty of choices in the 6.5 Frame as you described. I have quite a few in the bullet box.
But: they are not the 160 Grain RN that made the 6.5 in the last 100 years. So for me it is "sadly." There is nothing quite looking at that long RN bullet sitting in the case for me. Just a personal thing.
dmw


No doubt, it's like a fine woman w/long legs...hard to go back to a short legged one Wink

Agreed!
 
Posts: 2898 | Registered: 25 September 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia