one of us
| I put a 3x9 rifleman scope on my 243 coyote rifle multiple aim points out to 500 yards.
Works well if not that a VX-III with long range reticle in 3x9 or may be a 4x12 or so. |
| |
one of us
| Have VX-3 3.5-10x (40mm) on our Wby UL .243. Think it about right. Sam |
| Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| My daughters 243 Win. has a 2.5x8 on it. She has never needed more. Terrific optics. She hunts Deer and vermin with it. Hopefully Bear this upcoming Spring. Doug |
| Posts: 478 | Location: Central Indiana | Registered: 22 February 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Three suggested so far and all within the same 'range' and about right I would think. I prefer the 2.5-8X36. Add a B&C reticle and you'll have a handy ballistic reticle that will take you to 500 yards if wanted.
Shoot straight, shoot often. Matt
|
| |
One of Us
| |
| |
One of Us
| 4X12 if used for varmints
2X7 if used for game animals
3X9 to split the difference |
| Posts: 13978 | Location: http://www.tarawaontheweb.org/tarawa2.jpg | Registered: 03 December 2008 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I would personally choose the 2-7x Ultralight, given these parameters. |
| |
one of us
| VXII 3x9x40
As usual just my $.02 Paul K
|
| |
One of Us
| All good choices and Leupold anything is always good. I put a 2x-7x on a .308 Win 88 I gave my grandson and you couldn't ask for better based on results he has gotten. |
| Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Thanks for all the feedback
All of those mentioned were the ones I narrowed it down to, being a smaller rifle I will line them up and see which fits best |
| Posts: 394 | Location: Africa | Registered: 25 September 2009 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| There is no practical difference in the VX-I and VX-II (or "1" and "2"). Buy the "I" and put the savings into more/better ammunition. If you really do intend to use it as far out as 350 meters (382 yards), then you'll probably be a bit better off with the 3-9X. That said, the 2-7X will serve about as well and is a bit lighter and more compact. As others have said, you really can't go wrong with any of these Leupolds. Just be sure to mount it as low over the receiver as practical. |
| Posts: 13266 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I like and use VX1 2-3x33 a lot, but I personally prefer the VX3 2.5-8x36, but have always been too cheap to spring for one. Either will do whatever you want up to small game at 300. Editted to say that if you can see and shoot small game at x yards, you can certainly do the same for big game (calibre and bullet placement permitting, of course).
-- Promise me, when I die, don't let my wife sell my guns for what I told I her I paid for them.
|
| Posts: 1048 | Location: Canberra, Australia | Registered: 03 August 2012 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| My 243 wears a Leupold 4-12 and gets used for pronghorns and prairie dogs. It has proved to be the right combination. It started off with a 2 1/2-8, but I wanted more magnification for varminting. |
| Posts: 668 | Location: NW Colorado | Registered: 10 December 2007 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I agree, but I like my scopes low, so 32 - 36 mm objective is better for me.
-- Promise me, when I die, don't let my wife sell my guns for what I told I her I paid for them.
|
| Posts: 1048 | Location: Canberra, Australia | Registered: 03 August 2012 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I d put a 6x42 Leupold VX3 on it.....
Socialism works great until you run out of the other person's money......
|
| Posts: 492 | Location: Northern California | Registered: 27 December 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| VX3 2.5-8 is a excellent scope. Ran one on a .375 H&H for years. Took my share of Elk & Bear with the combo.
--------------------------------------------
Nothing like a trail of blood to find your way back home.
|
| Posts: 776 | Location: North Central Washington | Registered: 02 July 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| You cant hardly go wrong with the VX-6 2 x 12. There is not much it wont do. |
| Posts: 1440 | Location: Houston, Texas USA | Registered: 16 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I used a 2.5-8 for years and consider it a standard for any practical, all-purpose hunting rifle. The 243 doesn't generate too much recoil for needing more eye-relief than 3.5" or needing a stronger scope. (On a 416Rigby, I've gone to the 2-8 Nikon Monarch: great glass, slightly better price than the 2.5-8Leupold, 4" eye-relief, and tougher for recoil.) So for Leupold, the 2.5-8 would be great, especially if you can get short rings. For medium height rings, the 3-9 combos.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"A well-rounded hunting battery might include: 500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" -- Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
|
| |
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by TexKD: You cant hardly go wrong with the VX-6 2 x 12. There is not much it wont do.
. . . including bankrupt you with its price, at approximately five times the price of a VX-I 3-9. |
| Posts: 13266 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Mine wears a 4.5x14x50 ILL. |
| Posts: 20175 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by TexKD: You cant hardly go wrong with the VX-6 2 x 12. There is not much it wont do.
Amen brother! Fantastic stuff. |
| Posts: 2276 | Location: West Texas | Registered: 07 December 2011 |
IP
|
|
new member
| quote: Originally posted by TexKD: You cant hardly go wrong with the VX-6 2 x 12. There is not much it wont do.
I just got one. Fantastic scope. It is clearly ahead of the VX-3 series which I have on other rifles. Clearer and brighter picture. wider field of view and at last a quick focus. |
| |
One of Us
| VX3 3.5-10 or 4.5-14. |
| Posts: 1928 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 30 November 2006 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| When I first built daughters Sako action, Rimrock stock, Douglas air gauge bbl. 243 I put a straight 4X Luepold on. That saved any question about turning the scope up or down or ????? Just stuff it full of the Federal 100 grn. Sierra Game King ammo and put the duplex crosshair on the deer. Now squeeze trigger and go get dead deer downrange. I did all that on the KISS principal. So far in all these years she has missed only one deer and that was because the wind was blowing a gale and I doubt the buck never knew he was shot at. If you use the 2.5 - 8 or the standard 3 - 9 it will make a great combo that way too. When I did the above it was her first rifle and I was just trying to keep things simple as possible. She has kept it the same way all these years. Happy Turkey!
You can borrow money but you can not borrow time. Go hunting with your family.
|
| |
one of us
| Most of my rifles wear either a 2.5-8X or 3.5-10X Leupold. I'd lean to the lower power one if you're just after big game and the higher power if some varmints will be hunted as well. |
| Posts: 1230 | Location: Saugerties, New York | Registered: 12 March 2002 |
IP
|
|