THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Small Calibers    Which Leupold Optics for .243 Win?

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Which Leupold Optics for .243 Win?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Looking for opinions for the best/most suitable of the current Leupold range to be mounted on a Winchester all Weather Extreme in .243 Win.

Rifle will be used for walk and stalk hunting with shots out to maximum 350 metres

Thank you
 
Posts: 394 | Location: Africa | Registered: 25 September 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I put a 3x9 rifleman scope on my 243 coyote rifle multiple aim points out to 500 yards.

Works well if not that a VX-III with long range reticle in 3x9 or may be a 4x12 or so.
 
Posts: 19610 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Have VX-3 3.5-10x (40mm) on our Wby UL .243. Think it about right. Sam
 
Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My daughters 243 Win. has a 2.5x8 on it. She has never needed more. Terrific optics.
She hunts Deer and vermin with it. Hopefully Bear this upcoming Spring.
Doug
 
Posts: 478 | Location: Central Indiana | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Three suggested so far and all within the same 'range' and about right I would think. I prefer the 2.5-8X36. Add a B&C reticle and you'll have a handy ballistic reticle that will take you to 500 yards if wanted.


Shoot straight, shoot often.
Matt
 
Posts: 1183 | Location: Wisconsin | Registered: 19 July 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505ED
posted Hide Post
Don't know your price range, but a 3x9 40 mm is popular for this very reason

http://www.bearbasin.net/product_p/leu110800.htm

VX2 with a Leupold dot retical...

Ed


DRSS Member
 
Posts: 2289 | Location: Texas | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Snellstrom
posted Hide Post
All good answers, my preference is the 3-9x40 VX I or II or the 3.5-10x40, VX III.
I'm very accustomed to the standard duplex crosshair and know my rifles drop so holdover to 400 yards is relatively easy.
Good luck with your rifle
 
Posts: 5604 | Location: Eastern plains of Colorado | Registered: 31 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
4X12 if used for varmints

2X7 if used for game animals

3X9 to split the difference
 
Posts: 13978 | Location: http://www.tarawaontheweb.org/tarawa2.jpg | Registered: 03 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would personally choose the 2-7x Ultralight, given these parameters.
 
Posts: 223 | Registered: 25 July 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
VXII 3x9x40


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
All good choices and Leupold anything is always good. I put a 2x-7x on a .308 Win 88 I gave my grandson and you couldn't ask for better based on results he has gotten.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all the feedback

All of those mentioned were the ones I narrowed it down to, being a smaller rifle I will line them up and see which fits best
 
Posts: 394 | Location: Africa | Registered: 25 September 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
There is no practical difference in the VX-I and VX-II (or "1" and "2"). Buy the "I" and put the savings into more/better ammunition. If you really do intend to use it as far out as 350 meters (382 yards), then you'll probably be a bit better off with the 3-9X. That said, the 2-7X will serve about as well and is a bit lighter and more compact. As others have said, you really can't go wrong with any of these Leupolds. Just be sure to mount it as low over the receiver as practical.
 
Posts: 13245 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bren7X64
posted Hide Post
I like and use VX1 2-3x33 a lot, but I personally prefer the VX3 2.5-8x36, but have always been too cheap to spring for one.

Either will do whatever you want up to small game at 300.

Editted to say that if you can see and shoot small game at x yards, you can certainly do the same for big game (calibre and bullet placement permitting, of course).


--
Promise me, when I die, don't let my wife sell my guns for what I told I her I paid for them.
 
Posts: 1048 | Location: Canberra, Australia | Registered: 03 August 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My 243 wears a Leupold 4-12 and gets used for pronghorns and prairie dogs. It has proved to be the right combination. It started off with a 2 1/2-8, but I wanted more magnification for varminting.
 
Posts: 664 | Location: NW Colorado | Registered: 10 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bren7X64
posted Hide Post
I agree, but I like my scopes low, so 32 - 36 mm objective is better for me.


--
Promise me, when I die, don't let my wife sell my guns for what I told I her I paid for them.
 
Posts: 1048 | Location: Canberra, Australia | Registered: 03 August 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I d put a 6x42 Leupold VX3 on it.....


Socialism works great until you run out of the other person's money......
 
Posts: 492 | Location: Northern California | Registered: 27 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of SMACK!!!!
posted Hide Post
VX3 2.5-8 is a excellent scope. Ran one on a .375 H&H for years. Took my share of Elk & Bear with the combo.


--------------------------------------------

Nothing like a trail of blood to find your way back home.
 
Posts: 774 | Location: North Central Washington | Registered: 02 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You cant hardly go wrong with the VX-6 2 x 12. There is not much it wont do.
 
Posts: 1440 | Location: Houston, Texas USA | Registered: 16 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
I used a 2.5-8 for years and consider it a standard for any practical, all-purpose hunting rifle.

The 243 doesn't generate too much recoil for needing more eye-relief than 3.5" or needing a stronger scope. (On a 416Rigby, I've gone to the 2-8 Nikon Monarch: great glass, slightly better price than the 2.5-8Leupold, 4" eye-relief, and tougher for recoil.)

So for Leupold, the 2.5-8 would be great, especially if you can get short rings. For medium height rings, the 3-9 combos.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TexKD:
You cant hardly go wrong with the VX-6 2 x 12. There is not much it wont do.


. . . including bankrupt you with its price, at approximately five times the price of a VX-I 3-9.
 
Posts: 13245 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mine wears a 4.5x14x50 ILL.
 
Posts: 20165 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TexKD:
You cant hardly go wrong with the VX-6 2 x 12. There is not much it wont do.


Amen brother! Fantastic stuff.
 
Posts: 2276 | Location: West Texas | Registered: 07 December 2011Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TexKD:
You cant hardly go wrong with the VX-6 2 x 12. There is not much it wont do.


I just got one. Fantastic scope. It is clearly ahead of the VX-3 series which I have on other rifles. Clearer and brighter picture. wider field of view and at last a quick focus.
 
Posts: 15 | Registered: 26 December 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
VX3 3.5-10 or 4.5-14.
 
Posts: 1928 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 30 November 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
When I first built daughters Sako action, Rimrock stock, Douglas air gauge bbl. 243 I put a straight 4X Luepold on. That saved any question about turning the scope up or down or ?????
Just stuff it full of the Federal 100 grn. Sierra Game King ammo and put the duplex crosshair on the deer. Now squeeze trigger and go get dead deer downrange. I did all that on the KISS principal. So far in all these years she has missed only one deer and that was because the wind was blowing a gale and I doubt the buck never knew he was shot at.
If you use the 2.5 - 8 or the standard 3 - 9 it will make a great combo that way too. When I did the above it was her first rifle and I was just trying to keep things simple as possible. She has kept it the same way all these years.
Happy Turkey!


You can borrow money but you can not borrow time. Go hunting with your family.
 
Posts: 1529 | Location: Texas | Registered: 15 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Most of my rifles wear either a 2.5-8X or 3.5-10X Leupold. I'd lean to the lower power one if you're just after big game and the higher power if some varmints will be hunted as well.
 
Posts: 1230 | Location: Saugerties, New York | Registered: 12 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Small Calibers    Which Leupold Optics for .243 Win?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia