one of us
| Do you think maybe you could be happy with the Mod 7 in .260 Rem? It is the ballistic equivalent of the 6.5X55. Of course it is a young cartridge, has no character or pedigree. It is, well...never mind, sorry I brought it up.
Yes, find the used one and make what you want. What a rebarrel job is going to cost is a matter of what you buy(run of the mill vs. air-gauged), who installs it(good vs. bad). The one thing you need to be sure of is that the action/magazine you choose will accomodate the cartridge you want the gun chambered in. In comparison, the 6.5 Swede case is about 1/10" longer than the .308 variants according to my Hornady manual, the Max COL about 2/10" longer, or 3"+ for the Swede. It was originally loaded with things that looked like torpedos, and would kill elephants I'm sure, but YOU don't HAVE to do that. Anyway, these are the little things to examine and consider before your 'smith starts using heroic measures to put something together you won't like. And running up the bill. Maybe $400.00 will cover it, maybe you'll have change left over. Good luck. |
| Posts: 9647 | Location: Yankeetown, FL | Registered: 31 August 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| You need to just order up a Remington Mountain Rifle LSS in .260 Rem and be done with it ($800 MSRP). I solved a similar problem by rebarreling a Model 7 with a Mountain Rifle take-off barrel in .260 Rem. I'll post a photo of it later. |
| Posts: 842 | Location: Anchorage, AK | Registered: 23 January 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The Ruger stainless synthetic in the short action is very light and handy and would also fill the bill for what you want . |
| |
one of us
| I'd cast my vote for the Rem Ti, only in a 260 remington. If'n I had the dough, I'd have one already. Kimbers are nice, too, though. Hmmm, Quandry.
Coot |
| |
one of us
| Hey holzauge, Completely agree. I won't buy one I've not had in my hands either. And "new" ones can have defects too. I was looking at a full stocked M7 one time and noticed a rather deep dent in the wood up near the muzzle. It was located on top of the stock. Had to of happened at the factory or as the GunShop guys were taking it out of the box(I suspect the latter). If you will flip open your latest NRA "American Hunter" or "American Rifleman" there is a section which contains Gun Shows for your area of the country. You can go to one of them and generally be able to "handle" every type of rifle you are interested in. Caliber might be different, but you can at least get an idea of how well the rifle fits you. If you have any C&E Gun Shows in your area, they are generally one of the best in the Carolinas. www.cegunshows.com I believe Steve Elliott lives in Virginia, so surely they would have one relatively close to you. |
| Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
I'd cast my vote for the Rem Ti, only in a 260 remington. If'n I had the dough, I'd have one already. Kimbers are nice, too, though. Hmmm, Quandry.
Coot
I forgot about the Kimber's. Don't have one, but have fondled them in gun stores. Very nice. |
| Posts: 842 | Location: Anchorage, AK | Registered: 23 January 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| From the guns I have seen and used the Kimber Montana is the class of the group. I don't see why one would not just spend a little more and get something that's has more features and in my opinion is a much better design than the Remington. The latest Kimber 84M Montana's have a three position safety. Order one and specify that it have this safety. Not to disparage the Remington design as I have them but it's just not as interesting, safe or functional as a Kimber. This is my opinion and to each his own. The comb's on the Kimbers are rather high. If you have not seen one then you should handle one. They fit me very well with high mounts and mediums are ok too. Here is a link to gun shows but there may not be any particular gun you want there either. www.shotgunnews.com/gunshow/I would go to the Kimber site and call their local dealers and see who has a 84 Montana in stock. http://www.kimberamerica.com/index2.php |
| |
one of us
| Halzauge,
I live about 20 miles Mercersburg. I know where Don's shop is. I have talked to him many times, very nice man. I have been planning a 280AI for about 2 years, I think I got everything just trying to decide who name is going to be on the barrel. I just had a Browning Mirco Hunter built by one of the top ranked Bench rilfesmiths in the business. Barrel cost me $265, buddy had the reamer. He made me a headspace gauge from the drop, beadblasted the bolt and barrel resprung the trigger, threaded, chambered and crowned the barrel, trued the action and lapped the lugs. I had it back in 8 days. for a whopping $265 dollars. He even gave me a 1000BR primers for the rifle. Ifen I was building a light weight on a short action Rem. I would pick up a model 7 youth in 260 with the birch stock. $425.00 or less in these parts. Pac-Nor Barrel for 220.00, 50 bucks to get rid of that stupid J lock. Get a High Tech synthetic blank for $210, $290 for an HS. Finish the bedding and stock on my own and figure another 200-300 for a smith to throw it together. $1100.00 out the door. About what a Ti will run you or a few bucks more than a Kimber. Run a 23 or 24 inch barrel and forget the break. (IMO the calibers you speak of are not violent kickers and it will be a hunting gun, so it will be shot with out ear protection)A totally custom rig, way better than anything factory, if the right person put her together. A few phone calls and all of your questions will be answered. Pac-Nor will install and new barrel and true the action for $420 (barrel included), turn around is about 12weeks. They chamber the 6.5x55, they are awesome to deal with. Just my 2 cents. Cry once, do it your way the 1st time. I am done with factory guns, I will wait spend extra money but it will be right the first time. |
| |
One of Us
| " or even Tikka in 6.5x55." Forget that short necked .260 and go with the 6.5X55 and be able to handle the heavier bullets when you need to without eating up powder space. The performance of the Swede edges out the .308 mini clone every time.It was an inferior design at conception and it still is. roger |
| Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I think a Ruger lite rifle in 257 Roberts would be about ideal. Or if a Kimber 84 in 7-08 were in a gun shop it also would be good. I personally like the 257. With 115gr nosler BT's it is a deer slayer bar none. Loasd it up with 85-87gr bullets, and you have a great varmit gun and walking groundhog gun that will knock them into the next time zone. I know the 7-08 and 260 will do the same, but like the 243, they seem to bark louder than the bob. At least to me, this is so. When hunting, I seldom wear hearing protection, and this means a lot to me now that my hearing is not so good. Also, a good 250 savage would be a great gu to have. It would be more limmited to 100gr bullets, but I think it is still better than the 243. Again because of the noise factor. And of course, you don't see these chamberings in every camp, so there is the cool factor to think of also. |
| Posts: 134 | Location: North Dakota | Registered: 21 December 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
" or even Tikka in 6.5x55." Forget that short necked .260 and go with the 6.5X55 and be able to handle the heavier bullets when you need to without eating up powder space. The performance of the Swede edges out the .308 mini clone every time.It was an inferior design at conception and it still is. roger
They are ballistic twins. In a short action the 6.5X55 will encroache much more into "powder space". |
| Posts: 472 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 08 March 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| You gotta just love it when the whole world is wrong except for one know-it-all who is in fact clueless. |
| Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Quote:
"You gotta just love it when the whole world is wrong except for one know-it-all who is in fact clueless."
Gollly! Finely someone who understands me. Clueless roger |
| Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I picked up a Tikka T3 Lite afew weeks ago in 300wsm groups are great and recoil isn't bad for a 6.6 lb rifle. I got mine out the door for $485. I do have to use a past pad after afew rds on the bench and I was thinking about a muzzle break but not now after shooting it. The recoil is less than my model 70fwt in 300wsm. I look at the Kimber 8400 in 300wsm but saw one a guy had at the range groups were about 1 1/2" on three shoot. As I said in another post my groups are 5/8" for 3 shot and 3/4" for 5. I just right at about 8lbs with a 4x12 leupold scope included sling. Well good luck. |
| |
one of us
| Quote:
You need to just order up a Remington Mountain Rifle LSS in .260 Rem and be done with it ($800 MSRP). I solved a similar problem by rebarreling a Model 7 with a Mountain Rifle take-off barrel in .260 Rem. I'll post a photo of it later.
Do a Mauser in 6.5x55, you can do it for less than $800, and you will have alot more rifle than a Remington! |
| Posts: 3097 | Location: Louisiana | Registered: 28 November 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Major Caliber: I have a factory stock Remington 700 in caliber 260 Remington that I will shoot side by side with any 260 Mauser you have for the stakes that YOU name!
Lets get it on!
You are denouncing an excellent Rifle making company with your broad and incorrect statement!
If you were as smart as YOU THINK YOU ARE! You would retract that ridiculous and erroneous statement ASAP!
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy |
| Posts: 3067 | Location: South West Montana | Registered: 20 August 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| You Rem guys are so funny! You think groups sizes make a hunting rifle, it doesn't!! |
| Posts: 3097 | Location: Louisiana | Registered: 28 November 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
You Rem guys are so funny! You think groups sizes make a hunting rifle, it doesn't!!
They may not make one but they sure will break one! |
| |
one of us
| I see you sidestepped that challenge pretty quickly.......don't blame you.
You should at least tell us how these Rem rifles are failing everyone......surely you owe us that.
HogWild |
| Posts: 174 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 14 August 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
I see you sidestepped that challenge pretty quickly.......don't blame you.
You should at least tell us how these Rem rifles are failing everyone......surely you owe us that.
HogWild
I don't have a .260 rem. |
| Posts: 3097 | Location: Louisiana | Registered: 28 November 2001 |
IP
|
|