THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
which caliber
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I am thinking of a new gun for shooting coyotes, rock chucks, and ground squirls. I currently have a .257 Roberts but I feel it is just a little big plus I need another gun to tinker with.

I am considering .204 Ruger, .223, or 22-250. I don't want a heavy barrel gun. A sporter weight gun with a 24" barrel is what I am searching for. Most shooting will be around 200 yards but could be from 50-350 yards. What caliber, make, and model do I go with.

Thanks
 
Posts: 28 | Location: Kamiah, ID | Registered: 03 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Personallu I do love to shoot chucks/yotes with the big 6's on up.

But, given your situation I would most likely go 22/250 and 2nd choice would be the 204.

Mark D
 
Posts: 1089 | Location: Bozeman, Mt | Registered: 05 August 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
kinda depends if you handload or not. 223 ammo is a fraction of the price of the others if you don't load, but 350 is a fairly long poke for 223. 22/250, swift, or the like are much better at long range, but don't discount the 223 either. with a bit of practice that is. also if you want a light rifle it is much easier with 223 that the bigger round. (204 works the same)
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of todbartell
posted Hide Post
I like the 223, but both the 204 and 22-250 are good picks!

I like Remington rifles too, so Id suggest the LVSF m700
 
Posts: 857 | Location: BC, Canada | Registered: 03 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
The .223 is a spectacular cartridge.....far better than it appears to be on paper.....
I wish I'd have discovered it a long time ago.....


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
waveI just had a bad feed problem with my new Stevens Mod. 200 in 22-250. Two of my cohorts with the same mod. one in .243 and one in .223 gave theirs rave reviews and justly. Base price for them was $259.00 . Savage was willing to let a gun smith of my choice repair it if they agrre he was resonable. All three rifles are accurate and nice and light.FWIW. thumbroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I bought one of the rem sps back in the summer for the same purpose in 22/250.Found out it was light and pretty darn accurate.Below is comparing it to my savage bull barrel 223 @300 yds. shot off bench.Both have been bedded and trigger adjusted.
 
Posts: 508 | Location: Newton,NC,USA | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Those 22-250 will get out there. I've got one that reaches out and kills groundhogs. In the summertime.
 
Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of browningguy
posted Hide Post
I just had a 6x45 (6-.223) upper built for my AR. Still working on loads for it but so far it's accurate and very mild recoil.


Browningguy
Houston, TX
We Band of 45-70ers
 
Posts: 1242 | Location: Houston, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
tikka T3 stainless hunter 223 , shoot and shoot and shoot , and leavem were they lye , the brass that is Big Grin
 
Posts: 22 | Registered: 11 September 2005Reply With Quote
<9.3x62>
posted
I'd pick up a nice 222 from any of myriad makers. It will get the job done out to 300ish yds or so...

I've yet to own none that wasn't eye-poppingly accurate. Easy to load for and just plain fun to shoot.

If you're into wildcats, the 6mm-3000 is an excellent choice...
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MickinColo
posted Hide Post
I own a 17 Rem, 22 Hornet, 22-250 Rem, 220 Swift, 243 Win, and a 25-06 Rem. All of them are darn nice rounds but don’t overlook the 204 Ruger. I haven’t had so much fun with a cartridge as I’ve had with this one,, and I don’t even reload for it yet. The 17 Rem well knock the H_ll out of a coyote. The Hornet is a little weak at long shots but the rest of them are on the strong side. If you just want to shoot coyotes and leave them lay, than any caliber well do. If you want to skin them for pelts, than pick a caliber that makes the smallest exit wound. The 17 makes the smallest if any, the 20 shouldn’t be bad (haven’t shot a coyote yet with this rifle), if you use a 22, pick your bullets carefully.
 
Posts: 2650 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 15 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The 22-250 is an old favorite and tough to beat. My next barrel will have a fast twist for the 69-80 grain bullets. It would be too cool to have wind-bucking power without recoil.
 
Posts: 3889 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Go with a 6mm. You can shoot light bullets for varmints or heavier for deer.
 
Posts: 3785 | Location: B.C. Canada | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
223


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
223
 
Posts: 22 | Registered: 11 September 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia