Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
With a 30" tube, upper 130gr. to lower 140gr. high B.C. bullets, single shot config. Rem. 700 action. I am looking for flat shooting, knock em down 6.5 8 twist should get me there. Anybody have either one of these so I can get some first hand knowledge. Thanks GEG | ||
|
one of us |
I don't care for the Weatherby radiused shoulder -- just my prejudice. I don't have any experience with either (though I have decades of experience with the .264 Winchester), but I do have experience with a .340 Weatherby and a .338-8mm Magnum, which would be "identical in difference" to the 6.5's you propose. I found the .338-8mm, with it's standard 25 degree shoulder, easier to load for and it gave better accuracy (although this is only a comparison of two indidvidual rifles and doesn't necessarily have wider implications.) | |||
|
one of us |
quote:I DO have experience with the 7mm STW (two different rifles) and can tell you that 3600 fps with a 140 in that caliber is typically beyond reasonable expectations, and can doubly assure you that 3600 is not attainable (at acceptable pressures) from a 6.5 STW. Of course, jjdero did say "a bit less" than 3600, so if 200 fps is "a bit", I would agree that that is doable in a fast barrel. A .264 Winchester Magnum will do 3250, with the right powder, from a 26" barrel. The gain from using the larger STW case, considering that the .264 is somewhat above efficient bore capacity in the first place, would not be more that 150 fps, in my estimation. If you do build either a 6.5/300 WBY or a 6.5 STW, be sure to try WC 872, a surplus powder available from several dealers. It has worked well for me in both .264 and 7STW. | |||
|
Administrator |
GEG, We have built several 6.5 STW rifles, all with 26 inch barrels, except one which had a 29" barrel. The details of this one are here 6.5 STW I have not developed loads for the other rifles, but I understand their owners are extremely happy with them. The data you see above was developed by myself. | |||
|
one of us |
6.5/300 WEA have better design with longer neck ( better for throat life)and case are better in quality ( Norma, PMC and the othet except Rem ) than the Remington 7 STW or 8 REM. performance are close but dies are more commun in 6.5/300 WEA in both calibe request a chamber with tight base and a 0.295 ( tight enought without too thin neck wall ) I use 30 inch barrel and set back at 1200 rounds to rechamber and get a 27.5 barrel to get 1000 other round of life . velocity with 30 inch are impressive , forget 1 in 8 , 1 in 9 is good at hight velocity 1 in 8 you decrease accuracy and get some bullet burst by centrifugal force . avoid tubaular powder ( as sand blst in th ethroat ) and shoot slow , fast shooting rate can destroy your barrel in on 500 rounds God shooting and enjoy 6.5 cal long range DAN TEC | |||
|
one of us |
There's an excellent article in the '97 or '98 version of Handloader Digest on the .264 Thor (7 STW necked to 6.5). You may want to give it a look. I ended-up doing one a couple of years ago and the performance is decent. 140 grain bullets are between 3,350 and 3,400 with a 27" tube. Lee Martin www.singleactions.com | |||
|
<halfbreed> |
Saeed, do you have any 6.5 STW ballistics with 140 gn bullets? I am very interested in a long range, light recoiling rifle for culling purposes. I am also interested in the 6.5/300 wby, for the same purposes. Thanks John | ||
<jjdero> |
Grady, I misstated the bullet weight when I said 140 gr., BT by Nosler, very sorry for the wrong information, and I apologize for steering you in the wrong direction. I meant to type 120 grain ballistic by Nosler, #26120, but I must have had my head up my butt. I see that I did type 140 gr.(man thats embarrasing). No, Nosler, to my knowledge, does not make a 140 gr. BT. Again sorry for my misinfo. I do electrical work a little bit better than I type, not much, but a little. Again sorry about the typo. I would agree that the 264 Win mag would be a more practical choice for a hunting rifle, just not as much fun. good luck. jjdero | ||
<grkldoc> |
I am now on my second 6.5 STW and have built three. This one has a 32" barrel 1 in 9" twist on a winchester action in a choate plaster stock. I have a strain gauge and use a chronograph for load developement. The 108gr. lapua Scenar bullet BC=.478 goes around 3970-4000fps at maximum pressure(defined as 65000psi). The most accurate load runs at 3920fps. I've not the desire to shoot heavy bullets slow but out of curiosity have tried a few 140gr hornady AMAX loads and these end up around 3450fps. However, these did not group well most likely do to poor stabilization. In my experience, the problem with the heavier bullets is the limitation to primarily ball powders. These powders have given large velocity swings (not desirable for long range shooting). The production of Retumbo has helped with the lighter bullets up to 120 grains and this powder gives very consistent velocities. | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia