This whole 22 caliber for big game has made me chuckle so I thought to have some fun with it all. Hope you all had a Merry Christmas and here is to a Happy New Year.

Question:
Is a hunter who wounds an animal with a larger caliber more ethical then one who wounds an animal with a "smaller" caliber?

Choices:
Yes
No

Question:
Is a hunter who carries a rifle chambered for a large magnum, (that he never shoots cause of recoil) on the off chance he may be presented a long range quartering shot, more ethical then a hunter carrying a "smaller" caliber that he knows and shoots well?

Choices:
Yes
No

Question:
I believe recoil is something others should be concerned about but I know how to handle it.

Choices:
True
False

Question:
Do you believe my own personal biases and opinions are reflected in my choice of questions and wording and therefore this poll is a total useless endeavor regarding collection of meaningful data?

Choices:
Yes
No

 

Howard thanks for what will be a most informative poll. In another poll I requested a poll to see if bumblbees can fly--if it doesn't get started possibly you can do that one too?

Since I've already read and posted comments on two other polls on this same subject, I think I'm going to pass on this one. This isn't something against you personally, but I'm beginning to get tired of all these polls and threads about deer hunting with 22 caliber rifles.

That has got to be one of the most outcome driven polls I've seen in a while. Have you always been an Obama democrate?

I voted opposite of my beliefs just to screw with you Howard.