THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
243 vs 25-06
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of z1r
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Crazyhorseconsulting:
Okay, which one is going to perform better on game?


That depends on so many variables as to be impossible to answer.

Suffice it to say that your comparison was not apples to apples.




Aut vincere aut mori
 
Posts: 4865 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
Would the shooter or the critter being shot be able to distinguish any real difference between the two under normal field conditions and the bullets accurately placed.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Drum,,
I have shot both and hunted with both.
The quarry was kudu with the .243 and mule deer with the .25-06. The bullets killed the animal.

I have slowly learned to shoot the biggest (heaviest) bullet I can at 2800+fps as accurately as possible.

For deer, either works fine.
For bigger than deer, use the .25-06 as a minimum. Better yet, use a .270 or .300 WM !!!
 
Posts: 10433 | Location: Texas... time to secede!! | Registered: 12 February 2004Reply With Quote
new member
Picture of IRFUBAR
posted Hide Post
With a .243 at least you have the option of stepping up to a high B.C., vld type of bullet
if you want to shoot long range or hunt the plains were the wind always seems to blow and the range tends to be long.
Unfortunately the bullet manufacturers havent produced a .25 caliber vld type of bullet.
As I predicted in my earlier post I did get slammed by the ant-long range crowd.
The thing is a high B.C. is like a free lunch, the bullet doesnt waste as much energy fighting the resistance of the air and doesnt drift as much in the wind.
Anymore there are several vld tpe of bullets available in .243, the Berger is advertised as a hunting bullet.
People tend to get to hung up on the headstamp and with the advancement in bullets they should focus on the bullets.
The .243 will have less recoil, less muzzle blast and is a little easier to precisely place your shots. Those are real advantages to me.
That being said the average hunter that buys a box of Core-lokts a year and just wants to shoot any old deer would be better off with a 25-06.
Also the guy that hunts elk would be better served by a 25-06 with 120gr Nosler partitions.
The fellow who shoots whitetails from blinds at modest known yardages could do well with either.

Oh and SR4759, I do easily achieve 3000fps with 105gr Amax bullets in my 23" barreled 243.
And I have shot many deer at long range.
And I have killed my best mulie with a 25-06.
 
Posts: 24 | Registered: 17 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by IRFUBAR:
With a .243 at least you have the option of stepping up to a high B.C., vld type of bullet
if you want to shoot long range or hunt the plains were the wind always seems to blow and the range tends to be long.
Unfortunately the bullet manufacturers havent produced a .25 caliber vld type of bullet.


Berger makes a VLD in .257 caliber and the BC falls right between the 87 and 95 grain 6mm offerings. That is a out the only options for a 6mm VLD bullet out of a factory barrel anyway. I don't think a factory .243 offers any bullet advantages over the .25-06 in factory offerings except you have a wider selection of rifles to choose from.
 
Posts: 2242 | Registered: 09 March 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia