The Accurate Reloading Forums
tell me about a 17Mach IV.....

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6711043/m/28910328

18 October 2002, 04:01
<danev2>
tell me about a 17Mach IV.....
thinking about my next rifle project.
I 17Mach IV in a short action Savage.

Haven't found alot of data about them, but what I did find sounds interesting.
Wildcat off a 221 Fireball.
easy 4000 fps in a 30gr bullet.

What I want to know..
Accuracy?
bullet selections
terminal ballistics
difficulty in making brass.
Powder selection ?
Wind drift?
18 October 2002, 04:47
dave7mm
danev,The guy you want to talk to is Todd Kindler of The Woodchuck Den Inc. 330 897 0614.
He has a book out on the 17 caliber called
The Sensational Seventeens.The 17 MK4 is covered pretty well in the book.
My own 17Mark IV with 19g Norma N201 and a 25g Moly Berger bullet is just the ticket for chucks out to about 250 yards.Mild report no recoil to speak of and you can see most of your hits at 20x
Its a blast.
have fun.
dave
18 October 2002, 05:58
CISCO
Well, mine will be here in less than a week. I've never shot one but will shortly. I plan on using Berger 25 gr match bullets, Remington 7 1/2 primers and I haven't decided on a powder yet. I don't know about 4000 fps with a 30 gr bullet but with a 20 gr that should be easy. From what I can tell, it is very similar in ballistics to the 17 Remington. Forming brass is not too bad. I'm using CH-4D number 1,2 and 3 form dies then full length sizing with a Redding die. Bullberry makes a double ended die that'll form in three steps. Some people say you can use the Redding seater die with the stem removed then FL size but that just ruined brass for me. Todd Kindler recommends the RCBS form dies so they must be the best. You should probably anneal after forming too.

Chris
18 October 2002, 17:46
<Lightnin>
danev2
The Mach 4 will not achieve 4000 fps with a 30 gr. pill. It is however a very efficient cartridge and you will enjoy it. My next project is going to be a 17-222. It is every bit as efficient as the Mach 4 and the brass is much easier to form. All you gotta do is neck the .222 down to .17 and you're in business. It also means you can use Lapua brass if you don't mind spending just a little bit more for components.
Jim
19 October 2002, 02:53
CISCO
How many steps are involved in necking down a .222 to .17?

"All you gotta do is neck the .222 down to .17 and you're in business."

The same can be said about the Mach IV in that all you have to do is neck the 221FB down to .17.

Just wondering.

Chris
19 October 2002, 03:41
GeorgeS
The .17 Mach IV is formed from .221 FireBall brass, not .222 Rem.

Using the double-ended Bullberry die, lube the case neck and shoulder then run each case into the end marked #1. This necks the case to .19.

After you've done this to however many cases you want to work with that day, turn the die over and run the cases into the end marked #2. This necks the case to .17.

Fireform the brass, and you're done.

George
19 October 2002, 04:40
<Lightnin>
George,
Who said the Mach 4 is formed from anything other than the 221 fireball? I was referring to the 17-222 when I mentioned the .222.
Cisco,
There is no more work involved forming Mach 4
brass from fireball brass. They are both very efficient cartridges and both are easily formed. The only thing that has swayed my decision to go with the 17-222 is the availability of Lapua brass.
19 October 2002, 06:32
GeorgeS
Lightnin,

I stand corrected (I didn't see the reference to the .17-.222). [Embarrassed]

George