THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
chrony numbers for my .260
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Hi all

Just was able to shoot my Ruger compact .260 on tuesday. It shot OK I suppose. Not as good as I like but I am sure it was a lot more ME not doing well than the gun. Remember when you look at the velocities below that the barrel is only 16.5 inches. Really short.

Can anyone put me on a ballistics table that will give me the 100 yard point of impact for a dead on impact for 225 yards?

I was shooting some Rem. 140 gr. cor lokt. and some 120 grain NBT.

I kept 2 of each lot and went to a local reloader (alabama ammo inc. ). He shot 2 of each lot thru his chronograph and the results were

140 gr.

1. 2319 fps
2. 2345 fps

avg 2332
spread 26 fps
stdeva 18.38

120 gr.

1. 2514
2. 2463

avg 2488
spread 51
stdeva 36

I have ordered some 100 grain NBT's and bought a box of 129 gr. SST's.

Alabama Ammo will do short runs of any bullet that I want for a decent price so I am trying to find out the one the rifle likes best.

Jim B.
 
Posts: 1115 | Location: Huntsville, Alabama | Registered: 07 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TCLouis
posted Hide Post
Unless you have the ability to field test this information I would take it for what it is worth (free advice over the internet).

Using my ballistic calculator program I got the following information which is likely to be close or maybe not depending on how well a math program in a computer truly simulates your bullet and the BC is correct etc, ect, etc..

140 Rem Corelockt
25 0.55, 50 2.19, 75 3.38, 100, 4.12, 125 4.37, 150 4.11, 175 3.31, 200 1.94, 225 0.0

140 Rem 2332 fps 100 yd +4.12 for 225 at 0.0

120 NBT
25 0.27, 50 1.67, 75 2.70, 100 3.33, 125 3.56, 150 3.35, 175 2.71, 200 1.60, 225 0.0

120 NBT 2488 fps 100 yd +3.33 for 225 at 0.0

This assumes scope is 1.5 inches above the bore.

I still say I would field test at some of the distances in the table before depending on it and realizing bullet dispersion is likely to be some multiple of that distance and so will increse this total number to some UNKNOWN degree!

Math in the calculator will get one a good idea, then one needs to field test to prove how accurate some of the calctions (estimates and assumptions (WAGS and SWAGS)) were.

G' Luck,
LouisB [Smile]

[ 11-10-2002, 05:59: Message edited by: TCLouis ]
 
Posts: 4267 | Location: TN USA | Registered: 17 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That's pretty wimpy! I have a 14" pistol in 7mm-08 fires a 140gr 2700fps!
 
Posts: 3097 | Location: Louisiana | Registered: 28 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Jim B., Here's a site w/ a good ballistics calculator program (http://www.handloads.com/calc/index.html). I'd read when it first came out that the factory 260 Rem ammo lost a lot of velocity in a short barrel. Looks like that's still true... Should be able to easily/safely get a couple hundrd fps more velocity w/ judicious handloading. Gary T.
 
Posts: 491 | Location: Springhill, LA | Registered: 27 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I use 44 grains of H414 with 120 Sierra's. It shoot under an inch and chronographs at 2850.
I use a Remington 700 Mountain rifle with a 22 inch barrel.

Bob257
 
Posts: 434 | Location: Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia