THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
6.5 Creedmoor
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Dave Bush
posted
Anybody have one? What are the pros and cons. If you like another 6.5, which one do you think is best?


Dave
DRSS
Chapuis 9.3X74
Chapuis "Jungle" .375 FL
Krieghoff 500/.416 NE
Krieghoff 500 NE

"Git as close as y can laddie an then git ten yards closer"

"If the biggest, baddest animals on the planet are on the menu, and you'd rather pay a taxidermist than a mortician, consider the 500 NE as the last word in life insurance." Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (8th Edition).
 
Posts: 3728 | Location: Midwest | Registered: 26 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
Wink It all depends what you want to use it for, Dave ; holes in paper at 100 yds, just great! Long range antelope? Not the best choice by far.
fishingThe 6.5-06 or 6.5x.284 would be better choices for the later. beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
To start, 6.5's are a fantastic bullet. From there, one might look at their end use just as Roger suggested. Look at what type of bullet you would start with and the velocity you want. From their, then start looking at each cartridge and the velocities you can reach.

I run both a 260 Rem and two 6.5x47's. They provide, for me, what I'm looking for. One of my '47's is for sniper/tactical shooting and the other is a hunting rifle. I've found with the hunting rifles 26" barrel and Rel 17, I'm able to push the 140 gr velocity up to what other, larger capacity, cartridges are capable of doing. So for me, I don't feel the need to open my safe's door to another, larger, cartridge.

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I bought an old sporterized Model 96 Mannlicher Carbine. It is 100% factory original. Every number matches. Even the stock, just shaped up a bit and a schnabel forend added. A barrel banded front sight and a receiver sight were also added.

Caliber of course is 6.5x55. Took it to the range with some thrown together mid range Hornady manual loads and Hornady 140gr SP. Every group was under two inches and settled on one pushing the bullets at about 2400fps.

I love the way it handles and feels, just something about it.

That started the fire, so I have been researching 6.5's for over a year. I wanted a modern rifle in 6.5x55 or comparable cartridge, capable of realizing the full potential of the cartridge. Not a lot of new rifle choices out there, just had not found one to scracth the itch.

Then a NIB Model 70 Classic FWT came up for sale in 6.5x55. It is now mine. I really wasn't stuck on the 6.5x55, But it is nice since I already have all the reloading overhead and inventory for the cartridge.

Here is summary of my thoughts.

264 WM- Not a magnum overbore fan. The rifles are typically heavier and longer than I prefer. There are better cartridges for that style of rifle. Shorter barrel life.
6.5-284- specialized cartridge competition cartridge. Shorter barrel life
6.5-06- I already own a bunch of 270's, just not enough difference there.
6.5x55- Panache, history and nostalgia. Inevitably every new 6.5 cartridge gets compared to. Oh, and BTW it has worked fantastic for over 100 years. Lapua manufactures brass.
260 Rem- Americanized 6.5x55. Lapua manufactures brass.
6.5 Grendel- AR application
6.5 Creedmoor- Ruger/Hornady spin on 260 Remington. A savvy marketing move, given Remington's own marketing faux paus with the 260. See above on 260 Rem. which is basically a 6.5x55. Creates demand for new rifles and new reloading supplies.
6.5x47- Another specialized competition round.

You have been enamored with a Ruger in 338 RCM, a Ruger chambered in a 6.5 Creedmoor would fit right in. tu2
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SDhunter:
6.5x47- Another specialized competition round.



I take exception with that! wave

Their are a few of us here on the AR that have purpose built -47's to hunt with.

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I stand corrected then. Cool

From the Lapua website:
quote:
6.5x47 Lapua
The ideal choice for extreme accuracy. The 6.5x47 Lapua is a cartridge designed for serious competition shooting.


Doesn't it use a small rifle primer also?
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cliff Lyle
posted Hide Post
I just read a good John Barsness article in the June 2011 issue of Handloader on the 6.5 Creedmore. He speaks very highly of it.
 
Posts: 2155 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 03 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There is also an article on the 260 remington in the same issue.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hahahahahaha!

Take all the inexperienced posts for what they are on the Creedmoor!

I have one built on a McMillan A-5. I'm about to have 2 as I'm having one built on a McMillan Remington Varmint for just that; hunting.

It's an awesome round

Up to 3000 with the 140's

My accuracy has been 2775 to 2935.

Unlike Roger, I wouldn't hesitate to hunt everything up to mule deer with it. I have competition buddies who've shot antelope at 800 with the Scenar.

My friend with his new 6.5-284 wishes he went with the creedmoor.
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SDhunter:
I stand corrected then. Cool

From the Lapua website:
quote:
6.5x47 Lapua
The ideal choice for extreme accuracy. The 6.5x47 Lapua is a cartridge designed for serious competition shooting.


Doesn't it use a small rifle primer also?


Yes it does. Why? Are you going to bring up an unfounded rumor about poor ignition under cold temps? coffee My favorite time of year to shoot and develop loads is winter. For me that's Utah. Even in zero temps I've yet to experience an ignition problem. jumping

Oh, and Rick. I hope to be popping either a spike or cow this Fall with mine and 140 Berger VLD's. beer

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
Hahahahahaha!

Unlike Roger, I wouldn't hesitate to hunt everything up to mule deer with it.


fishingNor would I hesitate!!! I've used less powerfull 6.5s on Mule deer with great success. Now let's not have a pick on roger week. beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
Hahahahahaha!

Unlike Roger, I wouldn't hesitate to hunt everything up to mule deer with it.


fishingNor would I hesitate!!! I've used less powerfull 6.5s on Mule deer with great success. Now let's not have a pick on roger week. beerroger


Not from me beer

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
Wink It all depends what you want to use it for, Dave ; holes in paper at 100 yds, just great! Long range antelope? Not the best choice by far.
fishingThe 6.5-06 or 6.5x.284 would be better choices for the later. beerroger


Not picking on you Roger! Just disagreeing

You really don't need much velocity to kill an antelope. The Creedmoor will fit the bill as far as you can shoot and hit one.

The Creedmoor is not just for 100 yard paper shooting either.

It's a great cartridge that does both. With the huge amount of 6.5mm bullet choices in both target and hunting configurations you can't go wrong. I have a .264 WM and get about 400 to 500 more fps than I do with my Creedmoor but do so by burning about 40 more grains of powder. I have seen no advantage in all honesty with the .264 over the Creedmoor in accuracy. Just have to dial a few more MOA on the elevation knob for the Creedmoor. It's a pleasure to shoot with no recoil. I definitely see no advantage over the Creedmoor by the 6.5-284. My buddy is working loads for the 6.5-284 right now and getting about the same velocity as my Creedmoor.

This last Saturday, a buddy and I went out to nail down some 1000 yard data. He shoots a Creedmoor as well. We shot on the 1000 yard F-Class range in unbelievable wind. 27.25 MOA up from the 100 yard -0- printed nicely at 1000.

We then hung some steel out in the dirt at 419, 805 and 1045. We were shooting in full value 20 mph winds. The holdoff at 1045 was 2 full mils. At 419, it was almost a full mil.



 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rcamuglia:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by bartsche:
I definitely see no advantage over the Creedmoor by the 6.5-284. My buddy is working loads for the 6.5-284 right now and getting about the same velocity as my Creedmoor./QUOTE]

dancingAnd the magic is-----???? shockerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
Rick,

With the 6.5CM what velocities are you hitting with what bullets? What barrel length?

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
It's an awesome round

Up to 3000 with the 140's

My accuracy has been 2775 to 2935.


26" barrel

Roger the magic is that you don't gain that much over the Creedmoor with the 6.5-284. Just like all cases with more capacity in caliber, diminishing returns.
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Yes it does. Why? Are you going to bring up an unfounded rumor about poor ignition under cold temps?


No, just pointing out another difference.

In fact I got to handle a 6.5x55, 6.5-284 & 6.5x47 Lapua at a local machinist's shop today.
All nice rifles.

I think the Creed, 260 & 6.5x55 are all pretty much ballistically identical in modern rifles loaded to similar pressures. Pick your preference and enjoy.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
With the -47's small rifle primer's extra thick case head, pressures can not only be run higher but case life is still excellent. So, I run my 140 Berger VLD's at 2965 in that itty bitty little -47 case, 26" barrel too. I too topped out at 3000 fps.

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Wow, that is impressive.

What kind of pressure do think you are running?
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
While I have no problems with the Creedmoor, consider the 260, my 6.5 x 55 and my 6.5 x 57 I have my 6.5 bore needs taken care of.

The only thing I dislike about the round, is that the barrel lengths on all the rifles so chambered have LONG barrels to make the round exceed or equal the 260 Rem...

The round works on its own merits..but the market has made it a competition between it and the 260..
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SDhunter:
Wow, that is impressive.

What kind of pressure do think you are running?


In the 60's for sure. Didn't see a hint of pressure, slightly harder bolt lift, until I hit 3022 fps.

This is with Rel 17. Others topped out much earlier.

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
This is with Rel 17. Others topped out much earlier.



The extra 150 fps of velocity worth cutting your barrel life in half by using RL-17?

Not for me as I've been there and done that!
quote:
The only thing I dislike about the round, is that the barrel lengths on all the rifles so chambered have LONG barrels to make the round exceed or equal the 260 Rem...


Not true from what I've seen by real life comparison with friends I shoot with. The Creedmoor and .260 are the same with the same length barrels. Creedmoor has a slight edge depending on components
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I also have a 6.5x284 and don't see much advantage over the 6.5 creedmore. When my current barrel goes (that won't be long) I'm probably going to re-barrel to 6.5 creedmore. I'm getting 2950fps with my accuracy loaded sierra 140 mk./ imr 4831.


velocity is like a new car, always losing value.
BC is like diamonds, holding value forever.
 
Posts: 1650 | Location: , texas | Registered: 01 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Dave Bush
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SDhunter:
quote:
Yes it does. Why? Are you going to bring up an unfounded rumor about poor ignition under cold temps?


No, just pointing out another difference.

In fact I got to handle a 6.5x55, 6.5-284 & 6.5x47 Lapua at a local machinist's shop today.
All nice rifles.

I think the Creed, 260 & 6.5x55 are all pretty much ballistically identical in modern rifles loaded to similar pressures. Pick your preference and enjoy.


SDH:

How do you like your little 6.5X55 Swede? I have been thinking about that one too. I can just buy a Howa barreled action from Legacy Sports and throw it in a Boyd's laminated stock. Would be a nice project as well.


Dave
DRSS
Chapuis 9.3X74
Chapuis "Jungle" .375 FL
Krieghoff 500/.416 NE
Krieghoff 500 NE

"Git as close as y can laddie an then git ten yards closer"

"If the biggest, baddest animals on the planet are on the menu, and you'd rather pay a taxidermist than a mortician, consider the 500 NE as the last word in life insurance." Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (8th Edition).
 
Posts: 3728 | Location: Midwest | Registered: 26 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
So far I really like them, I have not had a lot of time to play.

But I am seriously considering a rebarrel on my faux Sendero in 270 to a 6.5 to take advantage of the better ballistics of the 6.5 bullets.
And to redo a shoddy gunsmithing job.

I still think that you could do very well with a Creed in a Ruger. It would be a perfect match to your 338 RCM.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
quote:
This is with Rel 17. Others topped out much earlier.



The extra 150 fps of velocity worth cutting your barrel life in half by using RL-17?

Not for me as I've been there and done that!


Rick,

I'll let it be known to all if or when that happens.

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Standing by!

My gunsmith checked my barrel at about 1500 rounds and was amazed at the wear.

The RL powders are high energy. No free lunch though, that high energy gives more velocity and wastes your barrel

His barrel went 4000 rounds with H-4350

I'm using H-4350 now as well.
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted Hide Post
Rick,

Using H-4350 with the 130 Berger VLD in my heavy -47. Have around 1000-1100 rounds down the barrel. Throat wear @ 750 rds was about .080".

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
That sounds like a lot.

With the RL after 2500 my barrel pretty much was done. He said it looked as though it has 2" of throat.
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
rcamuglia,

Your thoughts on the 260 Rem vs 6.5 CM?

Thanks
Warrior
 
Posts: 2273 | Location: South of the Zambezi | Registered: 31 January 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of D Humbarger
posted Hide Post
You might do well to look into the 260 Imp.



Doug Humbarger
NRA Life member
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72'73.
Yankee Station

Try to look unimportant. Your enemy might be low on ammo.
 
Posts: 8351 | Location: Jennings Louisiana, Arkansas by way of Alabama by way of South Carloina by way of County Antrim Irland by way of Lanarkshire Scotland. | Registered: 02 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Warrior:
rcamuglia,

Your thoughts on the 260 Rem vs 6.5 CM?

Thanks
Warrior


Either one is great. The performance is pretty much identical.

Velocity differences, which may be small, seem to be attributed to "fast" or "slow" barrels or what happens to be the most accurate load.

I will say also that I have friends who shoot the 260 that are now building Creedmoors. There must be a reason Big Grin
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
RC, does the Creedmore have more ""useable"" powder capacity than the .260? bewilderedroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
http://demigodllc.com/articles...7-6.5-creedmoor/?p=4
To eliminate all the opinion and warm feelings, this article pretty much tells the whole story.
flameThe end result indicates that the Creedmore offers nothing more than the .260 already gives. shockerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
RC, does the Creedmore have more ""useable"" powder capacity than the .260? bewilderedroger
.

quote:



Long-range shooter Ray "RayDog" Sanchez summarized the Tubb rifle in 6.5 Creedmoor as "boringly accurate" at 1000 yards. I've fired about four thousand 6.5 mm bullets from accurate barrels out to 1350 yards in the last 12 months. There is no question that these 6.5 mm BC bullets fired at 2700 up to 3000 fps perform at moderate and long range. Heading over to the unknown-distance (UKD) range, the 6.5 Creedmoor had great long-range performance. Without even building a known-distance (KD) data card, I took the calculated dope from the computer, dialed it for the first target at 880 yards, and made a first-round hit on a steel IPSC target. I then repeated the same process for the 997-yard target and made another first-round hit. Passing the rifle around the several shooters, it was boringly accurate, able to drop hits into sub-MOA groups at thousand-yard distances.
This is the third article I've written about mid-sized 6.5 mm cartridges in the last year. The first was .260 Remington, a .308 necked down to 6.5 mm (0.264-inch). The second was the 6.5x47 Lapua, which was designed by Lapua for 300-meter CISM competition and is about 0.3-inch shorter than the .260. Now the 6.5 Creedmoor joins the mix. Changing from the ubiquitous .308 to one of these 6.5 mm calibers is a big improvement, but how much difference is there between these three 6.5 mm calibers?



Despite the sub-freezing temperatures of the Colorado plains, the Tubb rifle and 6.5 Creedmoor made it easy for North Carolina shooter Tim Pack to make some of his first hits ever beyond 800 yards. Put in order of ballistic performance, the 6.5 Creedmoor and the .260 Remington are almost neck-and-neck, pushing the same weight bullets at about the same velocities from almost identical case capacities. The 6.5x47 Lapua in factory form lags by 100 to 200 fps due to less powder capacity; however, it has already gained a reputation for having a strong case that puts up with the high pressures some reloaders push in their custom rifles. The .260 Remington's main problem for the reloader is lack of high-quality and affordable brass and to date there has only been one factory load produced which was appropriate for serious long-range competition for the non-reloader. The 6.5x47 was designed for intermediate-range competition and very accurate ammunition is available from Lapua; however, these factory loads are at a ballistic disadvantage at long range compared to the .260 Remington and the 6.5 Creedmoor.
There will always be those who bash new cartridges, claiming that they don't do anything better than their favorite cartridge. By this logic, we'd all be shooting .30-06. Put simply, the 6.5 Creedmoor is what the .260 Remington should have been. It looks like Hornady has the right mind-set to make its new cartridge a success in the competitive and practical market, unlike Remington who basically let the .260 languish in a few hunting rifles. The 6.5 Creedmoor enjoys additional case capacity over the 6.5x47 Lapua, which allows better ballistics at a lower peak chamber pressure.

With the 6.5 Creedmoor, Hornady is offering a complete long-range solution, from a better case design through components to providing factory-duplicate load data. It provides ballistics conventionally limited to the big magnums in a low-recoil short-action cartridge. While it was designed specifically for NRA High-Power Long Range matches, it's an ideal cartridge for practical long-range shooting or general-purpose North-American hunting.


 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
"***Put simply, the 6.5 Creedmoor is what the .260 Remington should have been.***"

I concure with this and that's why I had built the 6.5 R-Bar that is also deep throated to handle heavy for caliber bullets while utilizing as much powder capacity as possible, facilitating an edge in longer range shooting at reasonable pressures. beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Can you post a pic of the cartridge?

What's the OAL and where does the base of the bullet sit in the case?

What is the capacity of the R-Bar?
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
Can you post a pic of the cartridge?

wavePerhaps Vapo Dog will post the picture if we ask him nicely.


What's the OAL and where does the base of the bullet sit in the case?
fishingThe OAL with the 156gr. Norma RN.,is 3.015"{ with the bullet perhaps .020" off the rifling. The base of the bullet is in the neck about .090" above the shoulder neck junction.

What is the capacity of the R-Bar?


holycowthe useable capacity with most bullets it is comparable Or maybe greater than the short necked, shallow throated, short action .260.

BOOMIll be testing the 156grain Norma's this coming week. beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Perhaps Vapo Dog will post the picture if we ask him nicely.


popcorn

Case capacity of Creedmoor and .260 = 53 grains
Case capacity of .308 Win = 56 grains

Which case is the R-Bar using?
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
quote:
Perhaps Vapo Dog will post the picture if we ask him nicely.


popcorn

Case capacity of Creedmoor and .260 = 53 grains
Case capacity of .308 Win = 56 grains

Which case is the R-Bar using?


fishingCases have been made from new .308 cases with their necks turned ( a must).
holycowand from win and RP .243 cases( No need to turn the .243 necks). By design the case length is 2.040" so trimming is not needed.
clapusing Butch's bushings and 6.5x47 Lapua dies wildcat dies did not have to be purchased. If you would like a copy of the reamer drawing send me your E-Mail address. beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia