THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Am I missing something?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of GSSP
posted
I have a donor Rem 700 LA that I want to build into a LR 6.5 hunting rifle. The bolt face is .473", or 308/3006.

I already have a 260 Rem and a 6.5x47 Lapua, both short actions.

I'm thinking something not too hard to work with, load and something that is "NOT" a barrel burner. It usally takes me about 500 rounds to finalize on a great load and I'd hate to burn 1/2 to 3/4 of my barrels life doing so.

I've got a 30-06 Ack Imp and have been down that road.

So what am I looking at?

6.5-06
6.5-06 AI
6.5x55
6.5x55 SKAN
6.5x55 Improved 40 deg
6.5x57 Mauser
6.5x284

Am I missing something?

I'd like to use great brass such as Lapua, Norma, Nosler.

Also, my action went on a diet and is pretty slim. Thus, my intent is to keep the overall rifle weight down.

Alan
 
Posts: 1719 | Location: Utah | Registered: 01 June 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RaySendero
posted Hide Post
Considering all your criteria I'd add the 6.5-284 but think I'd pick the 6.5/06 AI.


________
Ray
 
Posts: 1786 | Registered: 10 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
popcornThe 6.5 X 55 will put a fair sized bullet out of the barrel as fast as you need to stop any lower 48 animal in his tracks. No barrel burner there and it will handle the heavier bullets far better than your .260. beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
6.5x284 gets my vote


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
6.5-06ai sounds real nice to my ears.....
 
Posts: 969 | Registered: 13 October 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jpat
posted Hide Post
I shoot a 6.5x55 for just about all medium game. The 6.5-06 is my want to build!
 
Posts: 447 | Location: NH | Registered: 09 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of mad_jack02
posted Hide Post
6.5-06 AI is what I'm going to be building next myself.


Extreme Custom Gunsmithing LLC, ecg@wheatstate.com
 
Posts: 487 | Location: Wichita, ks. | Registered: 28 January 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The old classic 256 Newton, a 6.5-06 shortened a little bit.

http://www.ammo-one.com/256Newton.html

Drawing here:
http://stevespages.com/page8d.htm

Bruce
 
Posts: 217 | Location: SW WA | Registered: 14 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
264 Hawk
 
Posts: 449 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 13 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
.264 Win Mag.
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
6.5x55 will do the job on anything including European elk -even though I usually use a 9.3x62 for that. I´ve shot at least 30 deer with that caliber and good shotplacement has always led to a one shot kill.

Ask yourself what you need it for, what ranges you´ll be shooting etc and take itfrom there.


http://www.tgsafari.co.za

"What doesn´t kill you makes you stranger!"
 
Posts: 2213 | Location: Finland | Registered: 02 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jpat:
I shoot a 6.5x55 for just about all medium game. The 6.5-06 is my want to build!

tu2 Great minds think alike!


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The 6.5-284 has a following with a lot of data which could save you shots. You do have an LA and this is a strike against the 284 based case. You are losing one of it's benefits.

The 6.5 x 55 is great as is. The LA will permit great case cpacity if you have it throated correctly (long) to permit this.

The 6.5 x 57 sounds like a winner. I would Improve that and also use 257 Roberts +P cases. I hate wildcats too close to something bigger, i.e. 7 x 57 as there is room for confusion down the road, i.e. next owner when you're gone.

I would say 6.5-06 but don't think I would Improve that one. It would be pretty close to a 264 Win Mag but I never knew anyone with a 264 WM that kept it long. The logical case choice would be 270 but I hope you never mistakenly load a 270 Win in it. 264 WM are too fussy and also too hard to reach published velocity and I belkeive the 6.5-06 Imp would have similar issues.

#1 6.5 x 55 in my book and possibly Improve it if you want.


PA Bear Hunter, NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1629 | Location: Potter County, Pennsylvania | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have a 6.5-06AI and a 6.5-284 and if I had it to do over again, I would go with the simple 6.5-06. It is easy to make, no need to fireform, no potential feed rail issues, just performance.


Larry

"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Gee....I don't know, maybe a 270 Win... just might do the things you are looking for beer


DRSS &
Bolt Action Trash
 
Posts: 860 | Location: Arizona + Just as far as memory reaches | Registered: 04 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jpat
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by larrys:
I have a 6.5-06AI and a 6.5-284 and if I had it to do over again, I would go with the simple 6.5-06. It is easy to make, no need to fireform, no potential feed rail issues, just performance.

Larrys, Dr. Lou, I look at the ballistics and the 6.5-06 just says build me and put meat on the table. I like the BC of the 6.5 projectiles better than a 7mm or .270. The .270 never floated my boat because of the limited bullet weights a given rifle fires accurately. Most only shoot 1 weight well from my limited experience.
 
Posts: 447 | Location: NH | Registered: 09 May 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Jpat, I agree, that is why I have one of each 260, 6.5x55, 6.5-284, 6.5-06AI and 264WM. Yes, I know I am the Department of Redundancy Department, but they are sure fun. The fun part is that they all like different bullets. The 264 likes 125-129 bullets, the 6.5-284 and AI like the 120s, the 6.5x55 loves 140s and the 260 likes 100s. They are all 1:9 except the 6.5-284 which is a 1:8 twist. I am still playing with that one since it carries the second barrel for it.


Larry

"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I like the 260 for it's "not fussy to load for" attributes and brass availability is endless if actual "260 brass" is not available. It does not burn barrels up incessantly while only giving up 100-180fps to the 6.5x 284. That being said, necking down the old tried and true 30-06 case to 6.5..........6.5-06 looks very interesting!! Considering when it was taken down .007" more it created GOD'S chosen caliber!!......25-06. But with the myriad of high BC quality bullets available today, a 6.5-06 would be easy to find brass for(make your own from endless supply), bullet selection and bullet performance and not burning barrels up! GHD


Groundhog Devastation(GHD)
 
Posts: 2495 | Location: SW. VA | Registered: 29 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
how did you come to the 6.5-284 needing a long action? I have a 700 SA with a 22-284 barrel on it and loaded rounds feed just fine.

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia