Would appreciate any info.
Thanks Bob.
...not to offend anyone of different opinion because I certainly would use any of the others listed - if they were given to me.
Now here is my reasoning. The WSM is a new round and the SAUM is even newer. And I would personally not get into a rifle that does not have a proven track record of longevity, even if sales are not the best year to year. [Edit: This does not applly if I specifically desire a wildcat for some reason, just not a fan of "factory wildcats"]There are many, many orphan rounds out there, due simply to lackluster public interst, after an inital surge of buying frenzy.
With the 300 Win mag, you will have the advantage of proven performance, and readily avaialble brass. Same with the 338-06, it has been around for years, it is an easy wildcat, and Weatherby now makes factory rounds, if you want them, and have the A-square version. Yes it does lack some of the powder capacity of the 338 Win/340 Wby mags, it was designed to be a "poor mans magnum", it can go on a standard length action for only the cost of a barrel.
The other two mentioned, at this time, do not have the same amount of brass available, nor do they have the history, if something funny starts to happen, many shooters will be breaking new ground as to troubleshooting.
Ask me this same question, in 15 years, if the WSM and SAUM are still around, my answer might be different.
------------------
Safety & Ethics,Accuracy, Velocity, Energy
Joe M
[This message has been edited by JoeM (edited 10-19-2001).]