THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Small Calibers    Barnes is gauging the demand for a 100 ish gr 6.5mm LRX. Any interest here?

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Barnes is gauging the demand for a 100 ish gr 6.5mm LRX. Any interest here?
 Login/Join
 
Big-foot
One of Us
Picture of Big-foot
posted
I posted this over at the Campfire, figured I'd give you guys a shot at it too. I'm cutting/pasting the original post from the Grendel forum where he made his case.

quote:
http://www.65grendel.com/forum...le&p=55224#post55224

So I sent the idea to one of Barnes R&D folks, asking about the prospects of getting a Barnes hunting bullet specifically made for the Grendel.

What I was thinking was basing it off the 6.5mm 127gr LRX (BC of .468), re-profiling the nose to a more secant ogive, while keeping the tangent ogive from the bearing surface, reducing the weight to anywhere between 100-115gr, or whatever will keep the BC closer to .400 for G1, and giving us a little more case capacity.

What's nice about the LRX is a 1600fps expansion threshold, so a 100-115gr pill engineered to give us the most case capacity from the Grendel, with great accuracy and aerodynamic features might be of interest to us.

Barnes R&D has already told me it's totally doable, but will require enough demand to justify it to the marketing department. It will basically extend the effective range of the 100gr TTSX class bullet, which was designed with the 6.5 Swede and .260 Remington in mind. If we profiled it for the Grendel, it would benefit all of the 6.5's.


I like it. They would scream outa my 260 and reach out better than the 100 TTSX.

Would anybody else purchase these if Barnes makes em? They said they would be expanding the LRX line. This way they can improve on the 100 TTSX for general use and at the same time include the Grendel crowd.

Don't know how much it'll raise the BC over the 100 TTSX but here's a couple examples of other Grendel ogive bullets.

The ogive on the 120 A-Max was too blunt for the Grendel so Hornady made the 123 A-Max for them. The 120s BC is .465, the 123s BC is .510 from Hornadys site.

Same story for the 120 SMK so Sierra made the 123 SMK for them. The 120s BC is .417, the 123s BC is .510 from Sierra's site. Typo maybe? .417 sounds a bit low to me but...
__________
 
Posts: 116 | Registered: 27 January 2005Reply With Quote
Joe R. Lock
One of Us
Picture of Joe R. Lock
posted Hide Post
I would definitely be interested. I would buy some.
joe
 
Posts: 236 | Location: Florida | Registered: 08 September 2012Reply With Quote
D Humbarger
one of us
Picture of D Humbarger
posted Hide Post
More choices are always better.



Doug Humbarger
NRA Life member
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72'73.
Yankee Station

Try to look unimportant. Your enemy might be low on ammo.
 
Posts: 8351 | Location: Jennings Louisiana, Arkansas by way of Alabama by way of South Carloina by way of County Antrim Irland by way of Lanarkshire Scotland. | Registered: 02 November 2001Reply With Quote
Quintus
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would rather it be 110 grains.
 
Posts: 849 | Location: MN | Registered: 11 March 2009Reply With Quote
Big-foot
One of Us
Picture of Big-foot
posted Hide Post
The Grendel fellas are looking for the best combination of weight(for velocity) and BC. I gather they are depending on Barnes to help decide what that compromise weight is.

I'm for 100-107 or 108 myself. The 100 TTSX which should be similarly constructed to this LRX is a great weight for a tough mono bullet and very tough to stop. Personally I'd like to see a range of high BC hunting bullets in target bullet profiles like the 107 SMK and 108 Scenar. IMO Berger has shown that target profile bullets that are built for hunting sell, the high BC naturally is a plus and trendy apparently.
 
Posts: 116 | Registered: 27 January 2005Reply With Quote
prof242
one of us
Picture of prof242
posted Hide Post
Would like to try them out here on the prairie.


.395 Family Member
DRSS, po' boy member
Political correctness is nothing but liberal enforced censorship
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Colorado Springs, CO | Registered: 04 April 2003Reply With Quote
AggieDog
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would be interested in it for my 260 Remington.


Socialism works great until you run out of the other person's money......
 
Posts: 492 | Location: Northern California | Registered: 27 December 2002Reply With Quote
ghostrider272
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'd give them a try...
 
Posts: 771 | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
Cliff Lyle
One of Us
Picture of Cliff Lyle
posted Hide Post
Same here. I'd give them a go.
 
Posts: 2155 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 03 October 2006Reply With Quote
rik
One of Us
Picture of rik
posted Hide Post
another 260 Rem says yes
 
Posts: 38 | Location: Coquitlam, BC | Registered: 13 April 2005Reply With Quote
mauritz45
One of Us
posted Hide Post
i too would like to try them in my 260--cam
 
Posts: 157 | Location: san francisco bay area | Registered: 23 November 2007Reply With Quote
Gerard
one of us
posted Hide Post
http://www.gsgroup.co.za/264095HV134.html
 
Posts: 2848 | Registered: 12 August 2002Reply With Quote
Von Gruff
One of Us
Picture of Von Gruff
posted Hide Post
I have looked at you 95gn GSC bullet a few times Gerard but am trialing the 100gn TTSX just now and it runs at 2925 from the 21in barrel of my 6.5 Grendel Max.


Von Gruff.

http://www.vongruffknives.com/

Gen 12: 1-3

Exodus 20:1-17

Acts 4:10-12


 
Posts: 2693 | Location: South Otago New Zealand. | Registered: 08 February 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Small Calibers    Barnes is gauging the demand for a 100 ish gr 6.5mm LRX. Any interest here?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia