THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: 6.5mm Rem Mag
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
fredj338,
I think you hit the nail on the head as to why the 6.5RemMag never became popular. 6.5 projectiles are notoriously long for weight so on a short action a 140gr spitzer begins hogging alot of the powder space. Might as well shoot a 270Win! The cartridge was always packaged in the wrong action but even loaded into a long action what gains are there in comparison to a 270Win? Me thinks the shooting public just never saw a need for it.
Cheers...
Con
 
Posts: 2198 | Location: Australia | Registered: 24 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
If I were ti build one it would be on a med. or long action so you could seat those long bullets out where they need to be. For the SA, go w/ a .260AI.
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I think the biggest reason it never caught on was they were only availible in the butt ugly 600 & 660 carbines when Rem brought it out. Later Remington brought them out in the 700 but very few were interested by then. A handy little carbine with near 270 ballistics and an overall length about 4 inches shorter than most 270's should sell to people who hunt in thick bush.
 
Posts: 2442 | Location: manitoba canada | Registered: 01 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
They are just a louder 270 without a 26" barrel.
 
Posts: 3174 | Location: Warren, PA | Registered: 08 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have one of the early Rugers in 6.5 mag. it's a delightfull rifle, slim and easy to carry, 22" barrel/short action of course. With 120's you dont intrude to badly on powder space, but from there up you certainly do. It's no feat to get 3180 fps with the 120's, and that will handle anything I want to shoot with it. Nice caliber, but as stated, it doesnt do anything a 6.5/284 doesnt do.
 
Posts: 941 | Location: VT | Registered: 17 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Oh, heck, just nect the 270 WSM down .013 to 6.5 and be done with it. This is the equivalent of the 264 Win Mag, but it works out of a 24 inch bbl. The shorter case is far better than the 264 for reduced loads and you can duplicate the 6.5X55 with only 36 grs of XMP5744. Sooner or later this one will take over from the 6.5-284 in the 1000 yard matches.
 
Posts: 1111 | Location: Afton, VA | Registered: 31 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Not to be argumenative, but it seems to me the 6.5x284 is just so close and much simpler for a short action. SAs can be used with no bolt mods and little if any feeding problems. Plus, all the load info from the BR guys. capt david
But of course I own a 6.5x55
 
Posts: 655 | Location: South Texas | Registered: 11 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have never shot one, but it looks like a nice cartridge. I made one of my all-time booboos by not buying a Browning 6.5mm Magnum bolt gun with a 24" barrel that I saw in a Connecticut rifle shop. The literature suggests that it was intended to be Winchester 270 performance in the short-barrelled Remington 600 rifle, for sheep hunters.
 
Posts: 14621 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia