Quote:
If the 8x60 isn't possible (can't find reamers, etc.) then my second choice would be the 8mm-06. Use the same brass as mentioned above (to avoid the military cartridge headstamp issue in France). If the caliber/cartridge stamp on the rifle as "8mm-06" would present a problem with the authorities, then maybe just stamp it "8x63 Springfield" or something.
Quote:Quote:
If the 8x60 isn't possible (can't find reamers, etc.) then my second choice would be the 8mm-06. Use the same brass as mentioned above (to avoid the military cartridge headstamp issue in France). If the caliber/cartridge stamp on the rifle as "8mm-06" would present a problem with the authorities, then maybe just stamp it "8x63 Springfield" or something.
I still think 8X64S or 8X60S are the best choices, factory ammo and components is available on the market. The 8mm-06 is pure wildcat, no headstamped brass, components or factory ammo. Both would be historically correct for the rifle![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It' possible to use 7X64 or 270 win cases for makeing 8X64S brass if there is no factory ammo.
Cheers
/ JOHAN
Quote:
What's more, I'm not sure anyone has made it yet!![]()
Quote:
Exactly, the 8x60 was designed to address exactly this issue. However, I'm under the impression that reamers are hard if not impossible to find?
Quote:
Exactly, the 8x60 was designed to address exactly this issue. However, I'm under the impression that reamers are hard if not impossible to find?
As to the 8mm-06/8x63 you can use .270 brass or even 25-06 to circumvent the .30-06 headstamp.
I'd personally like to see you go the 8x60 route.
Quote:
8mm-376 Steyr