The Accurate Reloading Forums
338-06 dies?
28 December 2008, 23:46
Sid Post338-06 dies?
From Pac-Nor:
Your order is 1)338 10T sssm Rem Sendero contour 26" Fit and chamber for Rem 700 338-06 ACk FB crn, BB finish
I am looking at buying some dies, I have gotten confused with all the web stuff. The Pac-Nor 338-06 AI is a 40 degree shoulder but, I keep getting references to the 338-06 A-Square? How are the two different? Are they both the same with a slightly different shoulder location (seems like there are some minor difference in what A-Square standardized and a traditional Ackley Improved version)?
These are the dies I found on the RCBS website:
56397 - .338-06 IMP 40d F L DIE SET. Are these a good choice or, should I look somewhere else?
Thanks!
Sid
Best Regards,
Sid
All those who seek to destroy the liberties of a democratic nation ought to know that war is the surest and shortest means to accomplish it.
Alexis de Tocqueville
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.
Alexis de Tocqueville
28 December 2008, 23:56
ShinzoThe 338-06 A-square is simply the std 338-06 with their name added to it when they SAAMId it. It retains the std 17deg 30min shoulder that the parent 30-06 case has. You will need dies for the 338-06 Ackley which should be available from the likes of RCBS, Hornady, Redding or CH4D. The ones you linked from RCBS should be OK, perhaps confirm with them that they are right for the AI round, they sound like they are.
Steve
30 December 2008, 17:03
Sid PostWebsites like this tend to confuse things:
Ackley or A-square at Midway?
They list everything as Ackley Improved and A-Square but, they have different shoulders.
Best Regards,
Sid
All those who seek to destroy the liberties of a democratic nation ought to know that war is the surest and shortest means to accomplish it.
Alexis de Tocqueville
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.
Alexis de Tocqueville
30 December 2008, 21:47
onefunzr2
This is what I have used for the last 10 years.
30 December 2008, 22:56
jeffeossoSid,
Yep.. there's several differnt ways to AI a round, and most of th etime the shoulder angle, or neck determines the differences... and, with the 338, it's 50 max fps
30 December 2008, 23:22
ramrod340quote:
with the 338, it's 50 max fps
At equal pressure.
As usual just my $.02
Paul K
01 January 2009, 04:33
33806whelenA little off topic, but I was looking at some 338-06 Barnes data tonight and they seem to use a 210 magnum primer in many of their loads. I was just interested if anyone does that here? Or do you use regular primers?
01 January 2009, 07:45
ramrod340quote:
A little off topic, but I was looking at some 338-06 Barnes data tonight and they seem to use a 210 magnum primer in many of their loads.
My 338 is a wildcat. More like a Gibbs around 11% capacity gain over a 338-06. I use a magnum on a couple powders but normally stick with a std. I get better accuracy in my rifle.
As usual just my $.02
Paul K
03 January 2009, 20:31
onefunzr2Both Barnes #3 and #4 use mag primers for their testing. I worked up a load for 225 X flatbase bullets for plains game using a case full of spherical H414 and used standard primers with no problems.
Mag primers are usually suggested for really cold weather or spherical powders. Barnes's recipes list a majority of spherical powders so perhaps that's why they used mag primers for all their testing.
Ty Herring @ Barnes customer service could give you the answer.
07 January 2009, 06:12
rolltopquote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
quote:
A little off topic, but I was looking at some 338-06 Barnes data tonight and they seem to use a 210 magnum primer in many of their loads.
My 338 is a wildcat. More like a Gibbs around 11% capacity gain over a 338-06. I use a magnum on a couple powders but normally stick with a std. I get better accuracy in my rifle.
There is nothing wrong with using a magnum primer on all cases the size of the .30-06