One of Us
| You got the right advise. Current TSX actually foul less than some cup & core bullets. They are also very accurate in my rifles (unlike the old Barnes X) I have found the ATSX to be exceptional hunting bullets even at 300+ meters in my 7mm08 & 280 Ackley Imp. In the 300 Win Mag I would use the 165gr or 180 gr TSX or even the TTSX for very flat trajectory.
"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
|
| |
one of us
| Thank you so much for your reply. My son seems to have a knack for finding very large whitetails. The 180 gr Rem CLs don't exit them. Maximum distance we would shoot is probably 250 yards, an average is probably 100 yards. I don't hotrod my loads, so would probably be looking at 2900 fps with the 180s. Do you think that's enough velocity to guarantee expansion at 250 yards? Thanks, Sam |
| Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Thanks, Scott. I just ordered some Wipe-out and accelerant from Midway. Sounds like a 165 would be about perfect for big deer (and maybe a small Maine moose). Sam |
| Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: The foaming bore cleaners like Wipeout are the way to go and I've had no problem with accuracy fouling with the TSX |
| Posts: 847 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: 13 March 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by Samuel_Hoggson: Thank you so much for your reply. My son seems to have a knack for finding very large whitetails. The 180 gr Rem CLs don't exit them. Maximum distance we would shoot is probably 250 yards, an average is probably 100 yards. I don't hotrod my loads, so would probably be looking at 2900 fps with the 180s. Do you think that's enough velocity to guarantee expansion at 250 yards? Thanks, Sam
I believe Barnes told me that the minimum velocity required is 1,600 fps. Your bullet would most likely be around 2,000 fps at 500 yds. |
| |
one of us
| Thanks. I'm leaning toward the 165 gr (?168) TTSX. Sam |
| Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Sam, there is nothing wrong with cup & core bullets at 30'06 elocity! Bullets penetrating deer or elk into the heart lung area and resting under the skin on the off side is actually perfect performance. Not all shots will exit. Even a TSX may not exit on quartering shots if you hit big bones and the paunch. I recovered a 7mm XBT bullet from a red deer on a spine shot at 50 meters. It penetrated over 12" of spine and was under the skin.
"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
|
| |
one of us
| Very good responses here. The new TSX version of the Barnes bullets do not foul much at all. The old X bullets were terrible, but the addition of the groves on the bullets solved that. I think at the speeds you are talking about a Speer or Sierra 180 grain would give good performance and penetration. A Nosler Partition would be better yet. I have shot a fair amount of game with 180 grain Sierra's and Nosler Partitions with 300 magnums with great succes and generaly complete penetration. If you want to try the Barnes I recommend the 168 grain TSX. I had to switch to monolithic bullets here in central California so I went to the 168 TSX in my 300 magnums. I have had great success so far. I shoot them at around 3100 fps in my 300 WSM and about 3250 in my 300 Wby Mag. At these speeds they will open up, even on animals as small as coyotes.
R Flowers
|
| Posts: 1220 | Location: Hanford, CA, USA | Registered: 12 November 2000 |
IP
|
|