ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICA HUNTING REPORT FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: T.Carr
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Wild Africa inside a high fence?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of sheephunterab
posted
Just home from South Africa and we were fortunate enough to bow hunt one of the most amazing places we've ever been. Yes it was a high fenced national park but inside that 65,000 acres was a totally natural environment where all of the animals are self sustaining and lions form and hunt in prides and rhinos and elephants and cape buffalo roam . For those that believe all high fenced areas in Africa are canned you really need to think again. Hunting is used strictly as a management tool to control population numbers in the park and operates alongside photographic safaris. Due to the unique nature of this park and the high population of rhinos we were asked not to reveal its name nor location but this is a true jewel in South Africa and a bow-hunting only paradise. We consider ourselves blessed to have experienced it. If you are looking at a bow hunting safari in Africa, this is the real deal. Thanks so much to Gerrie Theron of Theron African Safaris Pty Ltd. for sharing this with us!





 
Posts: 1857 | Location: Alberta, Canada | Registered: 27 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sheephunterab
posted Hide Post
We had this black rhino within 5 yards of the blind one day...it was a bit intense.
 
Posts: 1857 | Location: Alberta, Canada | Registered: 27 February 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tarbe
posted Hide Post
I imagine someone will come alone and say this is not a wild hunt...it won't be me!

The BVC has a double electrified high fence around the perimeter of its 850,000 acres.

Someone will probably claim the BVC is not wild.

Different strokes....

Glad you had a great hunt!


Tim


0351 USMC
 
Posts: 1537 | Location: Romance, Missouri | Registered: 04 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sheephunterab
posted Hide Post
We've done many true free-range hunts in Africa and that's why I specified it was fenced but once inside it could quite easily be wild Africa. No put and take. No released lions. All animals living together as they would anywhere in wild Africa.
 
Posts: 1857 | Location: Alberta, Canada | Registered: 27 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal pappas
posted Hide Post
Congratulations on a wonderful hunt and your truthful evaluation.
Cal


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
 
Posts: 7281 | Location: Willow, Alaska | Registered: 29 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cougarz
posted Hide Post
Looks like a great place. Thanks for sharing. tu2


Roger
___________________________
I'm a trophy hunter - until something better comes along.

*we band of 45-70ers*
 
Posts: 2819 | Location: Washington (wetside) | Registered: 08 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of fairgame
posted Hide Post
Yes you can fence in the wild and these large properties can offer outstanding hunting.

We are seeing here some fences going up but mainly to demarcate land and to halt encroachment. More like a cordon than ring fence.

Some good looking animals there and well done.


ROYAL KAFUE LTD
Email - kafueroyal@gmail.com
Tel/Whatsapp (00260) 975315144
Instagram - kafueroyal
 
Posts: 10046 | Location: Zambia | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tim Herald
posted Hide Post
very nice TJ. Glad you guys had a good trip.


Good Hunting,

Tim Herald
Worldwide Trophy Adventures
tim@trophyadventures.com
 
Posts: 2981 | Location: Lexington, KY | Registered: 13 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Congrats to the OP.
And I have been to Zim once and SA twice. Yes you can have a wild experience in a high fence situation.


NRA Patron member
 
Posts: 2657 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 08 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
Congratulations on the hunt and the assessment of the property. tu2 tu2


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of FishN4Eyes
posted Hide Post
Looks like a great bow hunt!

Congrats!
 
Posts: 736 | Location: Helena, Montana | Registered: 28 October 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I am glad that you had a great time.


Wild Africa? I really do not know what to say.
 
Posts: 1550 | Location: Alberta/Namibia | Registered: 29 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
really like the sable and seeing one like that in open congrats ...

im a bowhunter too and i appreciate your honesty.
 
Posts: 1961 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Congratulations! Looks like you had a good time. I agree with your sentiments exactly.

My wife and I did a hunt 2 years ago in KZN in a similar sized property that was high-fenced. Most of it was thick and brushy. They had all of the Big 5, crocs and hippos. As best I could tell there was no put and take hunting going on. It was quite exciting while stalking for bushbuck and red duiker to run into buffalo or hippo at close range.
 
Posts: 154 | Registered: 17 August 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Skyline
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sheephunterab:
We've done many true free-range hunts in Africa and that's why I specified it was fenced but once inside it could quite easily be wild Africa. No put and take. No released lions. All animals living together as they would anywhere in wild Africa.


TJ.....congrats on your hunt. As I am sure you may have noticed over time, I have not had a lot good to say about a lot of high fenced hunting. Here in Canada I have personally watched high fence hunting for elk that left me embarrassed to even be in the vicinity.

Even the “elk hunters” looked dismayed afterwards and I could tell they were troubled by their “elk hunt”. I saw the same thing in South Africa. It that was on farms that had some self sustaining species, but really boiled down to them buying a bunch of trophy males from other game farms and auctions and releasing them to kill, especially for kudu bulls, etc.

Nothing fair chase about it. Buy a trailer load of kudu bulls (or whatever) and turn them out in the 5000 acre or hectare pasture for the group of hunters and have at it.

What you have described in your hunt report of a large area and self sustaining herds is a different thing. I hope more of it goes that way, with landowners combining resources and making things more of a real hunt and the game lives in a more realistic environment.

Nothing beats real wild Africa....but there is no doubt that the private landowners and conservancy’s can create a very real hunt and environment if they put their minds to it.


______________________________________________

The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who are bereft of that gift.



 
Posts: 1869 | Location: Northern Rockies, BC | Registered: 21 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
While there are certainly places where you have a truly wild feel behind high fences, and while there are places where things behind the high fences a pretty much as wild as Africa can be (thinking of BVC and Save, but even there, see what's happening with the BVC lion situation now), I think the place you hunted refers more to the former.
First off, I doubt you hunted in a national park. 65,000 acres sounds like a lot, but is actually not much larger than your average home range of a lion pride in unfenced areas. And male lion home ranges are usually quite a bit larger.
So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.
 
Posts: 674 | Registered: 08 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
With our changing World/Times and Attitudes, especially as far as HUNTING is concerned, High Fence hunting, where the animals are basically Privately Owned and not property of the State or the citizens, quite possibly/probably be thec ONLY form of hunting available in the not too distant future. That is just an opinion.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:
While there are certainly places where you have a truly wild feel behind high fences, and while there are places where things behind the high fences a pretty much as wild as Africa can be (thinking of BVC and Save, but even there, see what's happening with the BVC lion situation now), I think the place you hunted refers more to the former.
First off, I doubt you hunted in a national park. 65,000 acres sounds like a lot, but is actually not much larger than your average home range of a lion pride in unfenced areas. And male lion home ranges are usually quite a bit larger.
So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.


Nice of you to take the time to come here, and make only your 32nd contribution to the forum in 7 years, as a "crap on another's hunt report" post.

thumbdown
 
Posts: 8537 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:
While there are certainly places where you have a truly wild feel behind high fences, and while there are places where things behind the high fences a pretty much as wild as Africa can be (thinking of BVC and Save, but even there, see what's happening with the BVC lion situation now), I think the place you hunted refers more to the former.
First off, I doubt you hunted in a national park. 65,000 acres sounds like a lot, but is actually not much larger than your average home range of a lion pride in unfenced areas. And male lion home ranges are usually quite a bit larger.
So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.


Nice of you to take the time to come here, and make only your 32nd contribution to the forum in 7 years, as a "crap on another's hunt report" post.

thumbdown

+1 thumbdown


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13655 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You absolutely can can have a very rewarding hunt on a fenced area.

Curious, what national park was this in SA?
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Alberta (and RSA) | Registered: 16 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tarbe
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:

So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.


By your definition, any place with humans actively managing the flora or fauna is not "natural".

That is a pretty strict definition and one I must reject.

Edit: On second thought, my assessment of your statement might not be fair.

You seem to recognize that "natural" exists on a continuum.

Each of us must decide how natural our hunt must be, to be satisfying to us.


Tim


0351 USMC
 
Posts: 1537 | Location: Romance, Missouri | Registered: 04 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:
While there are certainly places where you have a truly wild feel behind high fences, and while there are places where things behind the high fences a pretty much as wild as Africa can be (thinking of BVC and Save, but even there, see what's happening with the BVC lion situation now), I think the place you hunted refers more to the former.
First off, I doubt you hunted in a national park. 65,000 acres sounds like a lot, but is actually not much larger than your average home range of a lion pride in unfenced areas. And male lion home ranges are usually quite a bit larger.
So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.


Nice of you to take the time to come here, and make only your 32nd contribution to the forum in 7 years, as a "crap on another's hunt report" post.

thumbdown

+1 thumbdown

+2


NRA Patron member
 
Posts: 2657 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 08 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal pappas
posted Hide Post
quote:
So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.


All of the above is also done on unfenced government hunting blocks. True, landowners do it more but they are not the only ones.
Cal


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
 
Posts: 7281 | Location: Willow, Alaska | Registered: 29 June 2009Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
Regardless of the size of the fenced property, the most objectionable part as far as I am concerned is the endless sign of civilization there.

Like trying to shoot an animal standing to a power line, having a road next to it with cars passing as you hunt.

Under no circumstances can one term this as a wild area.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69734 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
Regardless of the size of the fenced property, the most objectionable part as far as I am concerned is the endless sign of civilization there.

Like trying to shoot an animal standing to a power line, having a road next to it with cars passing as you hunt.

Under no circumstances can one term this as a wild area.


That's true Saeed...but unfortunately Africa is such that IMO - places like this are headed for the last bastion of wildlife havens and likely the best way forward for much of Africa's wildlife and their future! I too once hunted a 65,000 acre high fence place in Botswana for PG - it was awesome...never saw a fence the whole time.

I too prefer wild / remote Africa, but that opportunity is dwindling both in opportunity and cost affordability for many. I honestly think places like this are the future, and a good thing in general.

Congrats TJ - sounds like a really nice place.


Aaron Neilson
Global Hunting Resources
303-619-2872: Cell
globalhunts@aol.com
www.huntghr.com

 
Posts: 4888 | Location: Boise, Idaho | Registered: 05 March 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Sorry, if there's a fence to keep the animals in, it ain't hunting. Just me.

Grizz


Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal. John E Pfeiffer, The Emergence of Man

Those who can't skin, can hold a leg. Abraham Lincoln

Only one war at a time. Abe Again.
 
Posts: 4211 | Location: Alta. Canada | Registered: 06 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sheephunterab
posted Hide Post
Like it or not, the fact is there wouldn't be a single animal in this area we hunted were it not for the fence. The two choices are animals in a fence or no animals...there is no in between. That's what much of highly populated Africa has come down to. It was nice to see an area do it right.
 
Posts: 1857 | Location: Alberta, Canada | Registered: 27 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sheephunterab:
Like it or not, the fact is there wouldn't be a single animal in this area we hunted were it not for the fence. The two choices are animals in a fence or no animals...there is no in between. That's what much of highly populated Africa has come down to. It was nice to see an area do it right.


tu2
 
Posts: 8537 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Folks,

To me the fence itself is only a mental barrier to having a real hunt. There is a great deal of difference between a heavily stocked property in the RSA and a property holding only indigenous self sustaining populations of game. I've hunted these self sustaining properties ranging from 10,000 to 850,000 acres. If good anti poaching and a few added water points ruins that hunt for someone I guess that severely limits one's hunting opportunities. Let's not forget that a huge amount of NA hunting is on ranch land with pumped water and fences to keep out trespassers. Is this also not true free range hunting?

Mark


MARK H. YOUNG
MARK'S EXCLUSIVE ADVENTURES
7094 Oakleigh Dr. Las Vegas, NV 89110
Office 702-848-1693
Cell, Whats App, Signal 307-250-1156 PREFERRED
E-mail markttc@msn.com
Website: myexclusiveadventures.com
Skype: markhyhunter
Check us out on https://www.facebook.com/pages...ures/627027353990716
 
Posts: 13118 | Location: LAS VEGAS, NV USA | Registered: 04 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The first time that I ever saw a high fenced hunting area was in the Northern Transvaal as it was called back in the late 1970's. Driving the perimeter I noticed the bent metal rods where game had smashed into them while probably running for their lives from any one of the many predators in the area.

Say what you will and explain away that it is the future … Bah!!! It is not 'wild' Africa.


Perhaps a really big caged slice of Africa with lots of animals in it.?


Go have fun in it. And a lion or buffalo can still kill you as dead as one in the Selous or Chewore …


They just have no chance of ever just walking off into the sunset where you can not get at them.


And that is a huge difference to me..
 
Posts: 1550 | Location: Alberta/Namibia | Registered: 29 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by df06:
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:
While there are certainly places where you have a truly wild feel behind high fences, and while there are places where things behind the high fences a pretty much as wild as Africa can be (thinking of BVC and Save, but even there, see what's happening with the BVC lion situation now), I think the place you hunted refers more to the former.
First off, I doubt you hunted in a national park. 65,000 acres sounds like a lot, but is actually not much larger than your average home range of a lion pride in unfenced areas. And male lion home ranges are usually quite a bit larger.
So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.


Nice of you to take the time to come here, and make only your 32nd contribution to the forum in 7 years, as a "crap on another's hunt report" post.

thumbdown

+1 thumbdown

+2


Part of his experience was created by misinformation. He did not hunt in a national park, 65,000 acres is not nearly enough for a lion population (1 pride, maybe 2 if game numbers are kept above carrying capacity). It is misinformation like this which has cause the EU to ban wild lion trophies from SA. Sorry to point some things out, won't do it again, keep living in your fairytale wild world behind high fences and believe people who tell you that you're in a totally natural national park.

There is no need to misinform people like that. Good, wild experiences behind high fences are very much possible (like in this case) and fenced areas can be pretty close to completely natural too (unlikely in this case). Just tell people what it is.
 
Posts: 674 | Registered: 08 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:
quote:
Originally posted by df06:
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:
While there are certainly places where you have a truly wild feel behind high fences, and while there are places where things behind the high fences a pretty much as wild as Africa can be (thinking of BVC and Save, but even there, see what's happening with the BVC lion situation now), I think the place you hunted refers more to the former.
First off, I doubt you hunted in a national park. 65,000 acres sounds like a lot, but is actually not much larger than your average home range of a lion pride in unfenced areas. And male lion home ranges are usually quite a bit larger.
So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.


Nice of you to take the time to come here, and make only your 32nd contribution to the forum in 7 years, as a "crap on another's hunt report" post.

thumbdown

+1 thumbdown

+2


Part of his experience was created by misinformation. He did not hunt in a national park, 65,000 acres is not nearly enough for a lion population (1 pride, maybe 2 if game numbers are kept above carrying capacity). It is misinformation like this which has cause the EU to ban wild lion trophies from SA. Sorry to point some things out, won't do it again, keep living in your fairytale wild world behind high fences and believe people who tell you that you're in a totally natural national park.

There is no need to misinform people like that. Good, wild experiences behind high fences are very much possible (like in this case) and fenced areas can be pretty close to completely natural too (unlikely in this case). Just tell people what it is.



You've completely missed the point.

It's been pretty well hashed out that Crapping On someone's hunt report is POOR FORM, unless they committed some violation of law or grossly deviated from widely held ethical standards (the latter being a slippery slope). A gentleman telling us about his bow hunting experience on an RSA property where they are trying to provide an experience that is a step up above the typical ranch hunt does neither.

The point being that when someone takes the time to post a hunt report, you can pretty much bet they are wanting to share an experience that brought them great joy, or sometimes, in case the hunt went south, providing advise to those who may be interested in hunting with the same outfit / area.

I view this "Crap On" post of yours to be along the lines of advising a fellow who just purchased the sports car of HIS DREAMS, say a late model Chevy Camaro, that HE has been mislead, wasted his money and time, and has no idea of what HE should desire in a sports car because YOU prefer a Ferrari. Sorry, but I'm calling BS to that. Not everyone can afford the Ferrari and even among those who can, there are a variety of valid reasons why they may still desire the Camaro. And rest assured, there are some real thrills to be had by ownership of that Chevy!!

The fine point of my original comment is that not many discussions over a 7 year period have sparked enough interest on your part for you to feel compelled to speak up. In fact, prior to your comment on this thread, you've only felt inspired enough to speak 31 previous times in that 7 year period. The fact that the opportunity to Crap On someone's hunt report was enough to stimulate your 32nd comment in 7 years tells me all I need to know about how to value your opinion.

Than again, that's just my opinion and YMMV!

coffee
 
Posts: 8537 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:
quote:
Originally posted by df06:
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by BushPeter:
While there are certainly places where you have a truly wild feel behind high fences, and while there are places where things behind the high fences a pretty much as wild as Africa can be (thinking of BVC and Save, but even there, see what's happening with the BVC lion situation now), I think the place you hunted refers more to the former.
First off, I doubt you hunted in a national park. 65,000 acres sounds like a lot, but is actually not much larger than your average home range of a lion pride in unfenced areas. And male lion home ranges are usually quite a bit larger.
So yes, it feels wild, looks wild, but really it isn't natural. It really needs to be managed quite intensively (hunting, culling, moving animals in, moving them out, disease prevention and treatments for certain species, possibly vegetation management as well) and isn't quite as 'natural' as you would imagine.


Nice of you to take the time to come here, and make only your 32nd contribution to the forum in 7 years, as a "crap on another's hunt report" post.

thumbdown

+1 thumbdown

+2


Part of his experience was created by misinformation. He did not hunt in a national park, 65,000 acres is not nearly enough for a lion population (1 pride, maybe 2 if game numbers are kept above carrying capacity). It is misinformation like this which has cause the EU to ban wild lion trophies from SA. Sorry to point some things out, won't do it again, keep living in your fairytale wild world behind high fences and believe people who tell you that you're in a totally natural national park.

There is no need to misinform people like that. Good, wild experiences behind high fences are very much possible (like in this case) and fenced areas can be pretty close to completely natural too (unlikely in this case). Just tell people what it is.



You've completely missed the point.

It's been pretty well hashed out that Crapping On someone's hunt report is POOR FORM, unless they committed some violation of law or grossly deviated from widely held ethical standards (the latter being a slippery slope). A gentleman telling us about his bow hunting experience on an RSA property where they are trying to provide an experience that is a step up above the typical ranch hunt does neither.

The point being that when someone takes the time to post a hunt report, you can pretty much bet they are wanting to share an experience that brought them great joy, or sometimes, in case the hunt went south, providing advise to those who may be interested in hunting with the same outfit / area.

I view this "Crap On" post of yours to be along the lines of advising a fellow who just purchased the sports car of HIS DREAMS, say a late model Chevy Camaro, that HE has been mislead, wasted his money and time, and has no idea of what HE should desire in a sports car because YOU prefer a Ferrari. Sorry, but I'm calling BS to that. Not everyone can afford the Ferrari and even among those who can, there are a variety of valid reasons why they may still desire the Camaro. And rest assured, there are some real thrills to be had by ownership of that Chevy!!

The fine point of my original comment is that not many discussions over a 7 year period have sparked enough interest on your part for you to feel compelled to speak up. In fact, prior to your comment on this thread, you've only felt inspired enough to speak 31 previous times in that 7 year period. The fact that the opportunity to Crap On someone's hunt report was enough to stimulate your 32nd comment in 7 years tells me all I need to know about how to value your opinion.

Than again, that's just my opinion and YMMV!

coffee



Great post sir!

Simple case of crapping on another man’s hunt report. Such activity will only discourage members to write hunt reports and we all miss out on valuable information contained in the reports.
 
Posts: 179 | Location: USA | Registered: 28 September 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Grizzly Adams:
Sorry, if there's a fence to keep the animals in, it ain't hunting. Just me.

Grizz


Fences in Africa are no longer to keep the animals in....they are to keep the damn poachers, thieves and the like, OUT!


Aaron Neilson
Global Hunting Resources
303-619-2872: Cell
globalhunts@aol.com
www.huntghr.com

 
Posts: 4888 | Location: Boise, Idaho | Registered: 05 March 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Good point, Aaron.
 
Posts: 1550 | Location: Alberta/Namibia | Registered: 29 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To anyone who disparages fenced hunts, put them in a locked van with an air rifle and a house cat.

Let them take their best shot and after they are let out, they might have a little more appreciation for the reality of hunting big game in confined spaces. LOL

I actually knew a guy who shot a cat in a van with an air gun. LOL

BH63


Hunting buff is better than sex!
 
Posts: 2205 | Registered: 29 December 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tarbe:
I imagine someone will come alone and say this is not a wild hunt...it won't be me!

The BVC has a double electrified high fence around the perimeter of its 850,000 acres.

Someone will probably claim the BVC is not wild.

Different strokes....

Glad you had a great hunt!


Tim


Imagine building any fence around the border of 850,000! Bet it would take most of the day!
 
Posts: 526 | Location: Antelope, Oregon | Registered: 06 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sheephunterab
posted Hide Post
Bushpeter you are correct that is a lot of lions and they are having issues with them now. The ideal solution would be to hunt some of them but with the politics involved with getting government permits and the pressure from the greenies it's not likely to happen. I'm pretty certain I know where we were but I guess it could have been an elaborate facade to fool us dumb Canadians. Smiler
 
Posts: 1857 | Location: Alberta, Canada | Registered: 27 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for sharing. I know you want to return.

Many good hunts can be done in a fenced area...aswell as many bad hunts can be done on free range.


DRSS: HQ Scandinavia. Chapters in Sweden & Norway
 
Posts: 2805 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of samir
posted Hide Post
Nice trophies. Thanks for sharing your experience.


DRSS
Searcy 470 NE
 
Posts: 1438 | Location: San Diego | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia