Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Hi Malm, Are you going to be doing the Contender and Encore chambers and rechambers for us while Mike is busy makin his own barrels? Are you set up to do the matte finish on them. Now for the tough one. What kinda turn around time on your rechambers? | ||
|
one of us |
Listen Coon bone... I don't need no more temptation, see... I was almost happy that Mike couldn't do anymore work right now. He still has two of my barrels and it's saving me money while they relax in his shop. :-) Now just BACK OFF!!! Malm, Please say something like "cold day in hell..." BTW, if you want some help on a web page, I'll be back to doing some of that again in 2-3 weeks. Ain't no Miky Angelo, but we can get your stuff out there. Talk to Mike - I did some of his old stuff. I'm kind of like one of them Savage varmint guns... Not much good if ya have anything else, but not bad in a pinch. (ducking and running) <VBG> Thanks, steve | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Hey Steve You giving my Savage 22 Hornet a shot ? Just figured that I should defend it's honor it shoots better than you think, even if it's not the top shelf ! Rich Jake | |||
|
one of us |
Seemed like things were getting a little boring. In this forum you can sooner get by insulting a mans wife than his shootin' stock. LOL steve | |||
|
one of us |
LOL You Know I couldn't let you get away with that! Rich Jake | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Good thing you told me that Steve. I was just gettin ready to send ya an e-mail and see if you wanted to buy my like new VVCG 20" bull in 6x45[6x223] with dies, brass and bullets. Wow! Good thing I didn't. | |||
|
one of us |
Jules, You are KILLIN me. steve | |||
|
one of us |
Sorry But I have to fund this Encore project. Of all the custom barrels I own for my contender, This one is shot the least....Maybe 80 rounds or so. I'll be gettin the 250imp from Mike soon, and i'll be using it in place of the 6x45. It also has a Matte Redfield SMP 3 ring mount on it that's been line reamed and it matches the Matte black finish of the barrel. Sweet little carbine barrel. | |||
|
one of us |
Post a price | |||
|
one of us |
Malm, I am lurking in the back ground here also. I have a factory TC 22 Match new unfired waiting for a rechamber to 22 mag. Yes new and unfired, I am afraid to shoot it as I might change my mind about the rechamber and have to find another barrel for the chore! How much do you charge for that, and might as well do a crown job as well while you have it?? You may have bitten off more than you can chew with this bunch here?? LOL Jeff | |||
|
one of us |
Tommy, With over 600 bullets thats>> 1 box Hornady 70gr SXSP, 2 boxs Sierra 80gr SSP, 1 box Barnes 85gr XLC, Most of a box of the rest...Nosler 55 and 70gr BTs, Sierra 70gr Blitz, Sierra 70gr HPBT. A couple hundred pcs brass. Redding Full length size die and a Hornady FL die set, barrel and scope mount. Barrel is set up for the carbine forend. For all this,what do you think it's worth? [ 10-24-2002, 04:13: Message edited by: Jules ] | |||
|
one of us |
$5 cash money - already in the mail to you Coon Bone... :-) steve | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Jeff, You may just want to keep that Match barrel the way it is. It may be a great shooter. I was going to get a Match barrel and do the same as you. But after I talked to Mike and Sean, I got a plane used Super 14 22LR for $145. Had Mike turn it into a 22mag and it shoots 1 hole groups at 50yds and 20 shot groups at 100 that you can cover with a quarter. And that's with a 2x6 scope. | |||
|
one of us |
Jules, already have a 10" SS match barrel and another 10" blue standard 22. Also have an Anshutz Exemplar that will do better than I can. No 22mag, long story on this 14" match but it is gonna be a 22 mag one way or the other. Jeff | |||
|
one of us |
quote:I didn't know that Jeff. That said, by all means, Go for it. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Jules, This is quite correct! Also FYI, Mike does not chamber these 22mag conversions with a standard SAMMI spec reamer, but rather has his own unique process for doing these chambers, which I will let him explain in more detail. It is important not to use the SAMMI chamber reamer with the "forcing cone" throat. | |||
|
one of us |
I have a hard time choking every time I see any company proudly stating their producst are made to SAAMI standards. SAAMI standards are exactly what you DO NOT WANT. SAAMI standards are great for making everything sloppy enough that ammo, dies, brass, and guns all function, but for accuracy, you simply do much better when tolerances are held much closer than SAAMI standards. To my way of thinking, they are often worse than crap. Tolerances are one thing, but some of the designs are really puke. Any doubts about how I feel about SAAMI standards? THE Heretic | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Malm is welcome to take up the slack on the chamber work, and I have invited him to discuss individual jobs with me so he will know better what you have come to expect from my work. Repeating myself, I do not want to be sitting on a backlog of work, especially with the strong possibility that I may not be able to do shop work for potentially a significant period of time. Keeping short accounts will continue to be a strong motivating factor in many of the decisions being made. There is a lot more rechambering work to be done than I can handle in the first place, and in the second place, I want to focus on custom barrels I can complete and then make available for sale for immediate shipment. THEN..... Ole Coon Bone will have to complain that I am not making the barrel he wants instead of not getting to his rechamber job. THE Heretic | |||
|
one of us |
There is another reason for the decision to make barrels. Instead of responding to individual requests all the time, I get to be more creative and make what I think is neat and wonderful.... then hope someone else agrees..... and buys it. Mike | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha...Who....me? I never complain | |||
|
one of us |
BTW Guys, I'm going to keep the 6x45 barrel. Sorry about that. I would not be able to replace it for the price I would have sold it for anyway. I guess i'll just fork out the cash for the Encore project And ya aint gettin your 5 bucks back Steve [ 10-25-2002, 01:35: Message edited by: Jules ] | |||
|
<G.Malmborg> |
If any of you have projects that need doing, you can email me at <diveboss@xmission.com>. Please put "gunwork" in the subject line so I don't accidentally delete you... Thanks, Malm | ||
one of us |
Malm, Mike, do you guys do the 22-22mag chamber the same way? Or as close as humanly possible? Malm, will send you an e-mail. Jeff | |||
|
<G.Malmborg> |
Jeff, I am pretty sure we do... Malm | ||
one of us |
Mike and Malm, Have the two of you talked about the muzzle brakes Mike had? Mike could we get a look see on what they look like? My 308 needs one as it bites when loaded hot but I do not want to loose velocity by porting the barrel and in effect making it shorter. Malm I know Mike does not like screw on brakes but what is your temp on them? I saw the JP Howlitzer brake that Arhtur Brown list in his catalog and it looks fearce but should tame recoil big time. | |||
|
<G.Malmborg> |
KENTX, You have hit a nerve... Where to start. Screw on muzzle brakes have several draw backs. First, because they are threaded on, they add length, they can come loose and because they are threaded on, it is easy to misalign the axis of the bore and that of the brake resulting in the bullet flying off center through the brake. Misalignment of the axis causes off side gas influence on the bullet which affects it's flight, which affects accuracy. It is generally understood by those who build and install these things, that misalignments are possible, therefore the exit pupil is made much larger than the bullet diameter. This is done to avoid any possible contact between the brake and the bullet. By enlarging the exit tunnel, you are reducing the blocking effect of the bullet which is needed to help seal the brake so that the brake can work. By having holes all over the place, it is simply a matter of screwing it down without worry of proper gas port orientation. Now, screw on brakes CAN work if properly done. The trouble is, it requires precision threading of the barrel and brake. everything must be in perfect alignment to be effective. This kind of precision costs money. Thread on brakes are installed everyday accross the country with the majority being flat ass sloppy in their installation and fit. I won't do it. I would rather take that time and machine the brake directly into the barrel utilizing the bore as the zero point for all machining operations. This way I can guarantee that it is done correctly and will be most effective. A built in muzzle brake doesn't add length. The amount of lost velocity will be within your standard deviation or shot string spread and will not be detected if at all. I offer a built in muzzle brake I call the micro-burst. The 3 ports in my brake are perfectly oriented. There are 2 large rectangle ports on the side and one small rectangle port on top. There are no ports on the bottom so you can lay prone in the dirt without kicking up a dust signature, giving away your position, er, if you're so inclined. I haven't seen Mikes screw on brakes, but if he made them, they are first rate I am certain. I wouldn't have any heart burn installing his screw on muzzle brakes. I would send a picture of my brake but I don't know yet how to do that... When I figure it out, I will let you see it. Malm | ||
one of us |
quote:Malm, leave about .025" case/neck end clearance on the reamer, then grind off anything in front of that, except the pilot of course. Stake the extractor in place so it will not move around and grap the reamer. You need a close fit of extractor and case head with the rimfires.] Make sure you have some idea what the barrel to frame gap is, either from checking on a shop frame or better, checking on their frame. Dial in off of the bore itself when you set it up in the lathe. Due to curvature in the bores of many barrels, you may not be able to get a true total indicator reading of less than about .002," but this is a quantum improvement over the .010 to .020" runout between the bores and factory chambers common to many of the barrels. Cut the chamber to depth allowing some for frame to frame variation in gap.... about .003." With most barrels, having the case head come dead flush with the end of the barrel is good. If the gap is more than .003 or .004," then leave the case head sticking out about .001 to .002." I assume you want their frame in hand when you cut their chamber, right? Then you can either throat at .224" diameter with some light rifling contact on loaded ammo supplied, or run the throat reamer in for a total travel of about .1." Note the order of magnitude indicated. I used to go in about .125," but cut it back to .1" and have done some shorter than this. Total distance also depends on the actual profile your throat reamer cuts. Check it against some sample ammo. Ie., go in perhaps .050," then check to see how far the loaded ammo sticks out. Proceed to cut that additional distance. Leaving a little clearance is ok, probably preferred over hard contact with the rifling. It appears to me that anytime the breechface is impinging on the case head, you stand a good chance of running into problems with any chamber & ammo combination. While we are talking about grinding things off.... now is a good time to mention that most all chamber reamers have the flutes running forward of the throat area. If the reamer in this arear between throat and pilot is anywhere NEAR bore diameter, the flutes pick up chips and chew up the tops of the rifling. You will probably never notice it normally, but with the borescope, it stands out big time! I have never set up an oil feed through the headstock spindle, but this is a good cure for chips getting between the neck or throat area and the pilot and chewing things up. Hey, unless you have pilot bushings on all your reamers, I'll bet you have at least one reamer that has the flutes cut all the way up into the full diameter of the pilot itself..... just waiting to catch a chip and chew up the tops of the rifling. Whether you do it exactly like I do or not, the big thing is to get away from the cone arrangement and substitute a throat instead, preferrably with a long leade angle around 1 1/2 degree or less and an actual diameter no bigger than about .2242." Keeping the throat diameter minimum and lining it up with the bore are crucial for making any chamber shoot its best. There you have it for all the world to see. Ream away, a ream away.... the lion sleeps tonight. Ooops. Not quite right. Mike PS: Tip for the day. Instead of using a depth mike to measure how far the case sticks out of the chamber, put your dial indicator stand on the cross feed and run the indicator across the case head and barrel. Of course, if you went too deep and the case head is much below the end of the barrel, guess what? You still have that box of D-Con handy, right? Another hint, one to be avoided if possible, but if you make a mistake, you can peen the edge of the mouth of the chamber with a smoothly rounded punch and move the case head back about .003" to save your butt.... and the job. [ 10-25-2002, 10:46: Message edited by: Mike Bellm ] | |||
|
one of us |
Mike, Now there is a post that should live on in everyone's "saved files" file, and also preferably on a "Gunsmith's Corner" page on your website. >hint< I cannot pretend to follow every aspect of what you have described, but enough to see the logic and clever genius of how this procedure is far and away preferable to a standard job done using a SAMMI reamer w/forcing cone arrangement. Please keep up the excellent work AND the educational efforts [ 10-25-2002, 11:21: Message edited by: Sean VHA #60013 ] | |||
|
<G.Malmborg> |
Thanks for the tip, but since I don't make mistakes, there is no need to peen, shim or otherwise mouse it up... Of course, if I do the job, I will want their frame, this way there is no guessing. Malm | ||
Moderator |
Mike, Your mention of the shadetree surface conditioning tool aka peening reminds me of one of my first hands on machining lessons, aka mistakes, and the shop teachers passing on of the tip. It was senior year, winter finals week, and while I should have been studying, I had the inspiration to build a mini moto, or micro mini bike. I ran around to go kart, motorcycle and various shops gathering up wheels, tires, chains, sprockets and a 30 cc 2 stroke edger motor. In 2 evening in the shop I had the frame welded up, the whole thing assembled and running, needless to say, it was a bit crude. Anyhow, the lesson came when I was machining bearing pockets for the headset tapered roller bearings I had obtained. I was shooting for a 0.001" interfearance to press the cup in, and was even allowed to do the work on the Monarch 10 EE that the shop manager generally made sure the students didn't use. My problem was, I used the inside jaws of the caliper to measure the bore, not being aware that there was something called a telescoping bore gauge. My pockets that measured .001" under were a loose fit on the bearing race At this point I learned the inside arms on a caliper are not the right tool to use for accurately measuring a bore It was at this point the manager came over to see what I was doing, and then should how one could apply a spring loaded center punch to peen the surface. The bike was horridly underpowered, you had to give it a little push to get going, and trying to ride it on grass would just bog the motor. We did have a blast riding it around school all of spring quater | |||
|
one of us |
malm thanks for the input on screw on brakes. Looks like I'll download till I can have the barrel ported. I did see a horrible thing at the range where a person had used a Chote style, set screw flash hider on a 223. Flash hider was down range and twisted where it came off and took off with a bullit. It was still at the range so the guy must not have noticed it came off till he got home I do understand why both you and Mike do not like screw on brakes. Thanks Ken | |||
|
<G.Malmborg> |
KENTX, Can you immagine what it would have been like had the brake been a screw on type? I charge $150 - $175 to install mine. Email me your name and address and I will send you out a 3 page document describing the differences between those and mine. I've got over 23 years experience with muzzle brakes and muzzle porting. I think I have finally settled on a design that works... Malm | ||
one of us |
Sean - Hint taken. :-) | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Malm, it is something I aspire to, but alas have never reached that level. I DO make mistakes. Another tip: When dealing with the straight wall factory chambers, you will often find the rim cuts are at or past maximum depth. Then when you add the barrel to frame gap to it, you have some pretty significant headspace. One problem that crops up is with Starline .445 Super Mag brass when used in rechambered factory .44 Mag barrels. The Starline brass rims are thinner than .44 Mag rims, which further increases headspace still. And as has been reported, case stretching and separations do occur if some botchalism repair is not used. This is one instance where "mousing it up" by peening the edge of the chamber saves a barrel that otherwise has severe case separation problems. I did not cause the problem. It is already there, BUT since I do make mistakes, I have also learned what to do with the mistakes of others as well. Mike | |||
|
<G.Malmborg> |
Well, being human, I do make my share of mistakes. But the mistakes I make are of my own doing from scratch, not from compounding upon those that already exist. If handed a weapon where a mistake already exists that otherwise is unrepairable, I'll opt to refer the piece back to the maker... Some jobs are turds, and the more you stir that turd, the worse it stinks... and Sussermans stuff keeps showing up to remind me that is it prudent to sometimes reject work... Malm | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia