THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM DOWN UNDER FORUM


Moderators: Bakes
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
320gn Woodleigh on sambar?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Bwana_500
posted
Has anyone used the .366 320gn Woodleigh (either of the softs) on sambar? I am trying to standardise all my rifles on one bullet and would like to use the 320gn as the standard in my 9.3x64. I have heard good feedback on the 286gn Woodleigh for sambar, but am just worried the 320gn bullet may not open up enough for sambar.

Having said that, I would think the 320gn at around 2300fps would be hotter, but somewhere in the ballpark of the original .360 No2 NE double rifle loading, so the 320gn might be a very good option for sambar sized game. Anyhow – interested to hear firsthand experience.
 
Posts: 426 | Location: Australia | Registered: 03 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Give Geoff McDonald at Woodleigh a call, get the info straight from the man who makes them.
 
Posts: 351 | Location: Junee, NSW, Australia | Registered: 13 June 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
it sounds good - is that PP or RN??


A day spent in the bush is a day added to your life
Hunt Australia - Website
Hunt Australia - Facebook
Hunt Australia - TV


 
Posts: 4456 | Location: Australia | Registered: 23 January 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There's a significant difference in the recommended max impact velocities between the 320gr RN (2200fps) and the PP (2600fps) so it stands to reason the RN will open faster.

I suppose it comes down to whether you prefer one hole or two.
 
Posts: 351 | Location: Junee, NSW, Australia | Registered: 13 June 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mate i would stick with the 286grn pp they flatten the sambar no worries tu2
 
Posts: 896 | Location: Langwarrin,Australia | Registered: 06 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
even the 250gr rnsp are great on sambar...
 
Posts: 191 | Location: Australia | Registered: 17 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
I have tested the 320 gr RN Woodleighs in my 9.3X62 at the range & they shoot 6 to 8 inches lower than the 250 TSX & 286 gr Lapua Megas.

Ganyana who is very experienced with the 9.3X62 and uses it a loton buffalo does not recommend the 320 gr bullet for buffalo.


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11423 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've not used the 320gn but recently went on a buffalo cull where myself and a mate both shot 9.3x62s. I exclusively used the 286gn PP and my mate tried 250TSX and 250 & 286gn PPs. Based on that experience (20+ animals shot) I cannot imagine a reason to go heavier than the 286 PP on sambar. I've been carrying mine for sambar for a few trips now; hopefully I'll be able to report success in 2012!
 
Posts: 62 | Location: Adelaide, Australia | Registered: 21 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bwana_500
posted Hide Post
Guys

Thanks for your thoughts on the question.
 
Posts: 426 | Location: Australia | Registered: 03 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ozhunter
posted Hide Post
I've used them in the 9.3x62 but would not recommend this combo for Sambar as long shots across valleys may be required. However, a friend uses them with his 9.3x64 which is almost perfect. I would recommend the "Round Nose Soft" for up to Sambar size game.
 
Posts: 5886 | Location: Sydney,Australia  | Registered: 03 July 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia