One of Us
| Give Geoff McDonald at Woodleigh a call, get the info straight from the man who makes them. |
| Posts: 351 | Location: Junee, NSW, Australia | Registered: 13 June 2008 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| it sounds good - is that PP or RN?? |
| Posts: 4456 | Location: Australia | Registered: 23 January 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| There's a significant difference in the recommended max impact velocities between the 320gr RN (2200fps) and the PP (2600fps) so it stands to reason the RN will open faster.
I suppose it comes down to whether you prefer one hole or two. |
| Posts: 351 | Location: Junee, NSW, Australia | Registered: 13 June 2008 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| even the 250gr rnsp are great on sambar... |
| Posts: 191 | Location: Australia | Registered: 17 February 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I have tested the 320 gr RN Woodleighs in my 9.3X62 at the range & they shoot 6 to 8 inches lower than the 250 TSX & 286 gr Lapua Megas. Ganyana who is very experienced with the 9.3X62 and uses it a loton buffalo does not recommend the 320 gr bullet for buffalo.
"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
|
| |
One of Us
| I've not used the 320gn but recently went on a buffalo cull where myself and a mate both shot 9.3x62s. I exclusively used the 286gn PP and my mate tried 250TSX and 250 & 286gn PPs. Based on that experience (20+ animals shot) I cannot imagine a reason to go heavier than the 286 PP on sambar. I've been carrying mine for sambar for a few trips now; hopefully I'll be able to report success in 2012! |
| Posts: 62 | Location: Adelaide, Australia | Registered: 21 January 2006 |
IP
|
|