THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AVIATION FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
AC 130--whoops !
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
 
Posts: 7636 | Registered: 10 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Thank God the crew managed to regain control.


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16677 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Buses were not intended to be fighters. I would imagine they rippled some aluminium on that little maneuver.


___________________

Just Remember, We ALL Told You So.
 
Posts: 22445 | Location: Occupying Little Minds Rent Free | Registered: 04 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Eeker


DRSS
 
Posts: 1993 | Location: Australia | Registered: 25 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'll bet that 5,000 ft fall created some poopie pants! Not to mention destroying your career. Tough break for the pilot.
 
Posts: 3837 | Location: SC,USA | Registered: 07 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That C-130 was being very.....wait for it..................Flippant!! Smiler



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
One would think if one was the pilot of the C-130 in the photo that the visible control surfaces would be at extreme angle as the pilot tried to correct the invert. Also, if the -130 pulled enough g's to render the airframe overstressed, there's a distinct possibility that the crew (no g-suits) would have suffered enough damage to be unable to control a spinning top, to say nothing of a spinning C-130.

Let's here it for Photoshop.
 
Posts: 400 | Location: Henderson, NV | Registered: 21 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by poprivit:
One would think if one was the pilot of the C-130 in the photo that the visible control surfaces would be at extreme angle as the pilot tried to correct the invert. Also, if the -130 pulled enough g's to render the airframe overstressed, there's a distinct possibility that the crew (no g-suits) would have suffered enough damage to be unable to control a spinning top, to say nothing of a spinning C-130.

Let's here it for Photoshop.


The photo is obviously a recreation of the event. And the event obviously happened and no it does not take debilitating G force to bend a transport aircraft to the point of being scrap. It has more to do with the twisting moment than anything else.



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Toomany Tools
posted Hide Post
Should not effect the pilot's career much if any at all. USAF had a very long history of forgiving pilots for destroying aircraft. I was on a couple mishap boards, one where a pilot destroyed an F-15E due to performing a maneuver specifically prohibited in the -1, a maneuver he'd been previously admonished for performing, and he didn't even get a letter of reprimand even though it cost taxpayers upwards of $45-million. Maybe things have changed but I doubt it.


John Farner

If you haven't, please join the NRA!
 
Posts: 2946 | Location: Corrales, NM, USA | Registered: 07 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Toomany Tools:
Should not effect the pilot's career much if any at all. USAF had a very long history of forgiving pilots for destroying aircraft. I was on a couple mishap boards, one where a pilot destroyed an F-15E due to performing a maneuver specifically prohibited in the -1, a maneuver he'd been previously admonished for performing, and he didn't even get a letter of reprimand even though it cost taxpayers upwards of $45-million. Maybe things have changed but I doubt it.


So what does this have to do with a flight control failure?



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The same picture is on the linked page has the plane right side up.
https://www.flightglobal.com/n...d&utm_medium=twitter
 
Posts: 1245 | Location: Arizona | Registered: 09 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I think he was answering my comments earlier about the incident affecting the pilots career.
quote:
Originally posted by surestrike:
quote:
Originally posted by Toomany Tools:
Should not effect the pilot's career much if any at all. USAF had a very long history of forgiving pilots for destroying aircraft. I was on a couple mishap boards, one where a pilot destroyed an F-15E due to performing a maneuver specifically prohibited in the -1, a maneuver he'd been previously admonished for performing, and he didn't even get a letter of reprimand even though it cost taxpayers upwards of $45-million. Maybe things have changed but I doubt it.


So what does this have to do with a flight control failure?
 
Posts: 3837 | Location: SC,USA | Registered: 07 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Toomany Tools
posted Hide Post
Bobster is correct. I was commenting on the possible affect on pilots career, nothing else.


John Farner

If you haven't, please join the NRA!
 
Posts: 2946 | Location: Corrales, NM, USA | Registered: 07 February 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia