The Accurate Reloading Forums
Guns totally illegal in U.K.,... anyone hunting is
29 April 2004, 17:17
Matt77Guns totally illegal in U.K.,... anyone hunting is
Yeah, this bloke I know from the U.K. told me that all guns are illegal in the U.K. and there is no possible chance that hunting is legal. Funny, I know people who will book a hunt for you in the U.K. and I know people who go shooting on a regular basis and even, heavens forbid, own firearms.
Me and him got into a heated discussion and he said that how as an ignorant colonist would I know the laws of his country, and he was right and anyone I know that hunts in the U.K. is probably doing so illegally.
Thank goodness he is the one that ended up making himself look like a wanker in the end.
29 April 2004, 20:16
trans-pondKeep taking the tablets, mate!
29 April 2004, 21:43
DeerdogsWhere are you from Matt?
You type English English as opposed to US English.
01 May 2004, 02:10
bustinbucksCOVENTRY WARICKSHIRE ENGLAND
AND DAMNED PROUD OF IT-BLOKE
MOVED WITH FAMILY TO THE COLONIES WHEN I WAS A MERE LAD-
THE LAWS ARE A LOT DIFFERENT IN THE COLONIES WHEN IT COMES TO HUNTING- WE ARE ALMOST AS GOOD AS THE AUSSIES WHEN IT COMES TO FREE RANGE SHOOTING!
UP HERE IF YOU PUT ANY HUNTABLE EXOTIC/FARM ANIMAL ON PRIVATE LAND YOU CAN CHARGE BIG BUCKS FOR SOMEONE TO HUNT AND KILL IT YEAR ROUND
bustinbucks,
I know this... I was simply saying that it is amazing how people can be so ignorant of the law, and then argue about it and look like a wanker.
Quote:
COVENTRY WARICKSHIRE ENGLAND
AND DAMNED PROUD OF IT-BLOKE
MOVED WITH FAMILY TO THE COLONIES WHEN I WAS A MERE LAD-
THE LAWS ARE A LOT DIFFERENT IN THE COLONIES WHEN IT COMES TO HUNTING- WE ARE ALMOST AS GOOD AS THE AUSSIES WHEN IT COMES TO FREE RANGE SHOOTING!
UP HERE IF YOU PUT ANY HUNTABLE EXOTIC/FARM ANIMAL ON PRIVATE LAND YOU CAN CHARGE BIG BUCKS FOR SOMEONE TO HUNT AND KILL IT YEAR ROUND
Not wanting to get into anything controversial on this gentlemanly forum, but do you realise how insulting it is to refer to sovereign and independent countries as "colonies"?
01 May 2004, 23:31
DeerdogsNiro - My troll sensors are quivering a bit here.
02 May 2004, 04:42
OldsargeAw c'mon, Nitro,
If I can refer to the sovereign state of California (fifth largest economy in the world!), part of the sovereign United States of America as one of "the colonies" and keep my tongue firmly in cheek in the process surely others on this forum can do as well. Sheesh! And naughty, naughty! And hummpff!
OldSarge
I have had too many episodes of it being used disparagingly in the past, actually close to 100%. Usually in a rather pathetic attempt to appear superior so it rankles a bit. It is rather fresh in my mind at the moment. (rest snipped)
Now to bring some "hunting" to my post. "European" too as the settlers in 1840 were definitely born there. The local area had high grasses on these flood plains up to the waist of a man riding on horseback. The area was rife with ducks and kangaroos (and snakes). The local Aborigines used to 'fire' the grass after they dried out after Winter to encourage new "sweet" young grasses and the resultant infux of game (and also reduce snakes). They lived in the area during summer when it was warmer and migrated to the Murray River plains to warmer country during Summer, thereby also conserving game and resources in each area. I have a property named by Colonel William Light, the explorer and surveyer of SA, "Duck Ponds Creek" named to the large numbers of waterfowl then present (some still there too
). It still has the remnants of "canoe" trees and burn out 'shelter' trees. The gum trees along the rivers and deep soiled flood plains grew to great heights, and still do, at a guess some 90 to 100 feet or more.
Kangaroo, emu, euro, wallaby, lizard, snake, ducks and geese and other birds such as lorikeets and parakeets ad galahs formed the game diet. Yams, kumquats and quondongs (yes they are names of wild fruits
) formed some of their vegetative diet.
Those were the colonial days of European hunting here, some 160 years ago.
***
On the topic of the thread. If the ignorant think firearms are already banned. Great! No need for additonal laws.
04 May 2004, 08:09
bustinbucksNitro
I believe that the good olde USA still calls and consider where I live now as part of the thirteen orginal 'COLONIES'
the only difference between us is that my people moved west yours went south-
all in all each place has it good and bad sides
-can't say much for my other ancesters could have been horse thiefs or large land holders records burned or lost, old people died off taking with them what they knew-
"those who own guns are citizens
those without are subjects"
someone said this
never shoot your last shot
Truth to tell my ancestors considered Southern Russia (thank God not!), South America, South Africa, North America and Australia before deciding on Australia for some reason (probably religion was the reason).
PS Sorry to get the thread off track.
08 May 2004, 01:41
BoghossianOn one hand it is less likely to be banned by 'public reaction' when people think it is illegal. On the other, once something becomes completely marginalised, it is the begining of the end. Thank God, fieldsports are common in the countryside of even the most restrictive countries of Europe.
-Example: how many people do you know, even hunters that are not aware that you can still shoot Elephant, lion, and horror of horrors a leopard in complete legality?