Future could be bleak for hunters
The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com
Gene Mueller
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published February 16, 2003

As concerns England supporting the United States in its desire to rid the world of Saddam Hussein, God bless England. However, that's the only blessing we'll hand England, because our cousins across the sea are doing all they can to outlaw hunting � all hunting, not just the horse-riding, fox-hunting variety.
A bill to also abolish all hare and deer hunting will receive a second reading in Parliament. The most recent vote was 368-155 in favor of taking a closer look at the bill. It means things do not look good for hunters over there.

But why in the world would Americans want to copy the Brits in their anti-hunting activities?

According to the Associated Press, Rep. Jim Moran, Virginia Democrat, says he intends to see the baiting of bears outlawed on all federal (hunting) lands although many state wildlife officials say it is needed to help keep bear numbers in check. Even if it sounds distasteful, the baiting of black bears with a bucketful of leftover jellies, meat scraps, fish and old doughnuts anchored in a pile of rocks or logs is so effective that the shooter who waits unseen (and not yet scented) atop a deer stand eventually will get a bruin.

Moran apparently reflects the feelings of the majority of Northern Virginians, many of them relative newcomers from other states. In the 1950s and the years before that, when most of the residents were native Virginians, the voters of his district would have unceremoniously kicked Moran out on his ear for such anti-hunting feelings. It's a sign of the times we live in that people like Moran can safely assume constituents will be OK with his idea of slapping the hunters.

Of course, Moran has the support of animal rights groups, such as the Humane Society of the United States. A little over six years ago, the HSUS tried to get bear baiting banned in Michigan and Idaho but was rebuked by voters in those states. They now appear to have gained a friend in the House.

If Moran's bill fails, that doesn't mean the anti-hunters won't try again. And again. And again.

And what about Illinois Senate Bill 2431, which would have handed the right to hunt (or not to hunt) to the American Veterinary Medical Association? The way the bill was worded, it would have allowed the AVMA to set standards for the euthanasia of wildlife.

Pretty clever, isn't it? Imagine giving the puppy and kitty doctors the power to set wildlife euthanasia standards. Animal rights lawyers could easily have argued that such a bill, had it passed, would have applied to the dispatch of any wildlife species, including ducks, deer, doves, squirrels, geese � you name it. In other words, hunting would have come to a screeching halt. Not only that, such an euthanasia bill might have applied to all the fish and ended all sport angling.

Happily, the Illinois Senate thought it best to leave wildlife management in the capable hands of the state's Division of Wildlife Resources.

What the animal rights groups proved, however, is that they will travel any road, no matter how silly it might seem at the time, to take a chunk out of our American hunting heritage.

Meanwhile, one must wonder how animal rightists can ever gain any ground. In the money department, the hunting community is the 800-pound gorilla in a pen full of squirrel monkeys.

The Animal Use Issues Committee of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (IAFWA) not long ago released a report that showed how much money hunters spend to pursue their recreational activity. The report shows that hunting in America is big business, generating more than $67 billion in economic output, not to mention generating 1 million jobs.

On average, every U.S. hunter spends more than $1,850 per year to pursue his passion. Multiply that by the low number of 13 million individuals that hunt, and pretty soon you're talking about some serious money. Actually, the number of hunters in the United States is variously pegged at between 13 and 16.5 million.

You'd think that hunters could come up with enough money to counter the people who worship at the altar of animals. In fact, hunters have enough money to expose their lies and emotional rhetoric for all to see.

Yet, time and the hunters' apathy has been on the animal religionists' side.

� Look for Gene Mueller's Outdoors column every Sunday and Wednesday, and his Fishing Report every Thursday, only in The Washington Times. E-mail: gmueller@washingtontimes.com.

Look for Gene Mueller's Outdoors column every Sunday and Wednesday, and his Fishing Report every Friday, only in The Washington Times. E-mail: gmueller@washingtontimes.com.

Not quite accuarate .... All the current moves are to ban "hunting" with hounds, and that is regardless of if they are foot or mounted packs. Much of the arguments by the anti's is that where control is needed shooting is a more humane alternative. In Scotland where a siilar law was recently introduced the situation is pretty chaotic. As far as I know. only one Pack has folded...the others have converted to "gun packs" ...the law up there allows for dogs to be used to flush the quarry but not chase it... so they flushes the foxes to waiting guns now. Apparently kill/success rates are up about 300% and the Anti's are not happy!
As a side note, the new law is actually being challenged by Pro Hunting groups on various grounds in the European Courts and I suspect Blair might be watching this before deciding how far to go in England and Wales.

Despite how I started this reply, banning hunting will be the thin end of the wedge with many Anti's turning their attentions to trying to ban shooting, fishing or stalking if the get a ban on Hunting. However, over the last 5 years the Pro Field sports groups have become much more united and are fighting hard to support our Hound following brothers...

At last !!! I read a post by someone who can see what�s happening around them. I read a lot of posts by American shooters who seem to have no idea that they could be put out of business in short order. Our problems in the UK really started to bite after the Hungerford massacre. This was accelerated by another massacre of children at Dunblane. New laws have crushed the shooting and hunting community down and made us vulnerable to more legislation. The hard core will resist, the dross will just float away.