Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Does anyone have any experience with Blaser combination guns - particularly the 670 or 700? | ||
|
one of us |
This would be a question for Johan to answer | |||
|
one of us |
Just yesterday I handled a Blaser D 99 Duo. [2 9,3x74R bbls and a 20ga. bbl]. The rifle was suprisingly light and handled and felt good. It was at a store so I did not get to shoot it. | |||
|
one of us |
Johan, Please enlighten us as to what rifle(s)(make and calibre)you have. There are some of us who would like to know what such a mature hunter uses so that we may emulate you. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:JJP, since you are not getting a ton of other useful replies, I might try my hand. If I'm not much mistaken the "700" series was the series of combination guns prior to the new "90" series (i.e. BBF 95, BBF 97 etc etc). Is that also your understanding? (I don't know about the 670, so comments below apply to 700 only) If yes, then these guns came with the (then) standard Blaser cocking system, soldered barrels, the SLK Blaser trigger system and (possibly) with one of the earlier Blaser mounts (e.g. BBSM or BSM). Obviously, it is also possible to find a gun with a non-Blaser mount on it. In Europe, this could typically be an EAW mount of some sort, or even a claw mount. In general, the 700 series sold well, and was a common occurrence on the range and in the hunting fields of Central Europe. They were regarded as well made guns, but perhaps not of the same "class" as some of the other brands - where manufacturing was still directed towards gunsmithing traditions (e.g hand fitting). Combination guns with soldered barrels always suffer from the necessity of letting the rifle barrel cool off before a second shot is fired to verify accuracy. This is a general problem with soldered barrels, but is more of a problem on the range than in the field. My drilling has soldered barrels, and it has never bothered me the least when hunting. The Blaser over-and-under combinations traditionally had only one "lock", so you had to re-cock if you wanted to fire both rifle and shot barrel. Not a great problem IMHO. I have always liked the Blaser cocking system, although activating the cocking lever on these earlier models took a bit more power compared to the system currently in production. Some women had trouble cocking the guns. Make sure you cock *before* you mount the gun, that makes it a lot easier. De-cocking was typically done with a little lever on top of the cocking piece. You have to hold your thumb against the cocking lever to avoid it noisily releasing at this point in time. Technique can be picked up in 5 minutes of trial and error. Most likely, the cocking lever will automatically return to its "uncocked position" (ready to cock, when you open the gun (e.g. for a reload). The SLK trigger system was one of the first "modern" trigger systems for combination guns. It was generally well thought of and produces very acceptable triggers. If I'm not much mistaken, a point of the SLK was to avoid having to use set triggers (shudder ) The earlier Blaser mounts such as BBSM were of good quality. Even after Blaser stopped using them, they were still being installed on guns of other manufacture. I have one on my Krieghoff drilling, and it provides excellent service. All in all, I think one can summarize it as "good guns, if not necessarily the most upmarket ones" from a time period stretching all the way into the early 90'ies. - mike | |||
|
one of us |
MHO - thank you for the detailed summary on the Blaser. I believe this rifle is a 700 but find it strange that there is no model number on it. According to Blaser the major difference between the 670 and 700 is that the 700 has a forend which can be removed without tools. It seems strange that you would have to break the gun to fire the shotgun after firing the rifle (as an example). The rifle has two triggers. I'll have to investigate a bit further. It also have a dovetail system for mounting a scope. Any idea how the Blasr 700 would compare to BRNO offerings? I own a Suhl drilling and am very pleased with the fit and finish - remarkable. Thanks again for your time and assistance. I'll post a few pictures later tonight or tomorrow of the Blaser. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Nope, breaking the gun does not cock the firing mechanism. This can only be achieved via the cocking lever. So if you want to fire 2 shots without reloading (e.g. 1 rifle shot, one shot with the shot barrel), you have to re-cock the rifle using the cocking lever between the two shots. Most likely, the first shot will make the cocking lever move back to its uncocked position, ready to cock again, should you wish to do so. I don't know what kind of hunting opportunities you enjoy, but short of hunting driven pigs, there are few situations that I can think of where the ability to fire 1 rifle/1 shot would be required. Your mileage may differ, but I would not get hung up on this too much. The two triggers: the front trigger fires the rifle barrel. The rear trigger fires the shot barrel. But they share the firing mechanism (what I call "lock"), of which there is only one in Blaser shot/rifle over/under combination guns. A dovetail mount most likely makes it a Blaser BBSM or BSM mount. If the scope sits on top of a little metal bridge, the front end of which is the dovetail, and the rear end pivoting into a locking mechanism activated with a little lever, most likely you have a Blaser BBSM. If the "bridge" is missing but otherwise the mount works the same a BSM. Blaser vs. Brno: If I could afford the Blaser, and assuming they are both in good condition (I don't suppose you have the opportunity to shoot them before you choose??), then I'd choose the Blaser any day over the Brno. Brnos are OK, but not in the same class as the Blaser. But, hey, it is your money, and the Brno might be somewhat less expensive (it should be!). Merkel and other Suhler weapons are usually of good quality. In particular I like the ones with a Greener lock! - mike | |||
|
one of us |
Now my ignorance is really showing. Cocking lever? The 700 also has a plastic (ugly) trigger guard. Receiver appears nickle plated with modest engraving. | |||
|
one of us |
JJP, Hopefully these photos show the cocking lever quite clearly. http://www.blaser.de/english/firma/sicher.htm I haven't played with Blasers very much but the cocking mechanism feels a bit foreign at first. Obviously with the many Blaser owners about you can get used to it or even like it. | |||
|
<JOHAN> |
quote:Well, if I'm right, you got four Argentine mausers and one blaser kiplauf Have I found a weak spot I got three Brno ZG-47 and two others rifles, they are not blasers. The rest is secret As I have stated before that the ONLY blaser I could thing of owning is a kiplauf with steel receiver and 0% plastic or aluminium. Enlighted ? / JOHAN | ||
one of us |
Thanks again guys. Here is a photo of the rifle I am talking about. Has anyone made a replacement trigger guard out of steel? I am wondering how difficult it would be? Shouldn't be that hard if you have a machinist like background? Thoughts? I originally mistook the thumb cocking piece for a safety like on the Suhl. Thanks for clearing that up. | |||
|
one of us |
JJP The plastic trigger guard on my wifes Sauer drilling broke. I had JJ Perodeau at Champlin Arms replace it with a seel one. It looks so good that if my next drilling has a plastic trigger guard I will have him put a steel one on it right away. www.champlinarms.com | |||
|
one of us |
My opinion about Blaser is that I am in deep awe, concerning their marketing people (thinking about the R93 now). They should have their salary doubled, regardless of what they earn now. If Blaser fire all their engineers and designers who are guilty of designing such a piece of sh!t (still thinking about the R93) they might free the money to do that. /HerrBerg [ 11-09-2003, 01:13: Message edited by: HerrBerg ] | |||
|
one of us |
Guys can you tell me what parts on this rifle would be aluminum and plastic? Trigger guard is plastic. Receiver? Nickle plated or aluminum or something else? Top tange by cocking piece? Thanks again. | |||
|
one of us |
Well Blaser tells me the side plates are some kind of Dura - Aluminum with nickle plating. So much for wanting to obtain a rifle like that. The trigger guard of plastic was a tough one to swallow, but the aluminum.............. Oh well, time to save more money..... Thanks to all of you who responded. Cheers, | |||
|
<JOHAN> |
HerrBerg it seems like you and I have quite the same opinion, funny I think the blaser engineers should gotten the sack long time ago JJP, The receiver could be made of Aluminium, but most parts that take wear and tear in the action are most likely steel, I would't bet on it. / JOHAN | ||
one of us |
Nickel plating????? Jesus. It's bloody embarrassing that 50% of the new rifles sold in Europe are Blasers, considering that I have always made my best to rant about the miserable quality of american-made common rifles. I'll include Europe in my ranting from now on. Looking into my gun closet, I see Sauer-Brno-AntonioZoli-Beretta-Sako-Beretta. The AntonioZoli combination gun could a little bit embarrassing , but the older ones were great and this one is old, and I shot my first black grouse with it when having borrowed it from my father. It's solid steel, has a hair trigger and absolutely outstanding 1st and 2nd shot accuracy. No, I won't tell how good, since people have problems accepting the figures I would need to tell. /HerrBerg [ 11-11-2003, 15:42: Message edited by: HerrBerg ] | |||
|
one of us |
Somewhat like ballistic tips, there is no middle ground on Blasers. Those who have them generaly swear by them, those who don't swear at them. One group keeps on hearing of problems and the other group keeps on experiencing great results. As one who shoots ballistic tips from his Blaser in between sacrificing children to Satan I can only say that the quality is excellent and that neither the ally reciever nor the plastic trigger guard causes functional problem. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Hey, another member of the club of aficionados of modern engineering! | |||
|
one of us |
Decided not to discuss this theme after all. Good luck to all, whatever you prefer. - mike [ 11-12-2003, 17:04: Message edited by: mho ] | |||
|
one of us |
1894 - the plastic trigger could be a problem especially with age. I suspect odds are it will be a problem, but that is speculation. The aluminum side plates well may be a problem if the rifle sees harsh weather. I suspect the nickel plating should help minimize corrosion between the steel components and the aluminum. Generally its bad practice to mix dissimilar metals - if I remember correctly, a galvanic cell is generated. I suspect these parts keep production costs down and definitely make the rifle lighter! Personal preference I suppose is the main issue. I'm a steel guy............... | |||
|
<JOHAN> |
quote:Finally someone who admits, no water test, no bon fire I have suspected this a long time, witchcraft Comparing blaser with ballistic tip is like asking for ice water in hell. Ballistic tip is a great bullet for the right animals / JOHAN [ 11-13-2003, 20:31: Message edited by: JOHAN ] | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia