http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...ops-say-experts.html

I see the problem too but I doubt that the solution will be that simple or easy. See the grief over Badgers for one

Very sensationalised and emotive. I can't wait to see a hoarde of deer descending like locusts anywhere I stalk.

Dr Dolman assessed the population of roe/muntjac in one corner of England and have now extrapolated this data to apply to the rest of the UK...

Some of the mucking forons commenting on the article need serious psychiatric help!

The BDS response:

PRESS RELEASE issued on 07/03/13



The British Deer Society’s official statement on the Dolman Report, University of East Anglia



The British Deer Society welcomes good science. It has yet to read Dr Dolman's report in full, but has seen the sensationalist headlines calling yet again for an increased cull of deer across the UK.



The Society is wary of headlines such as 750,000 deer to be culled annually - this is not well-justified and sounds as if it offers rather an arbitrary figure, not one based on a very scientific approach. Further, as a percentage of the wider UK deer population, the BDS will be interested to see the methodology behind an estimation of 1.5m deer in the UK, which is 25% lower than a recent estimate by the Deer Initiative of deer in England and Wales.



The British Deer Society acknowledges that there are areas within the UK where there are far too many deer - such as the Arne Peninsula (where recent active management has more recently been effective in reducing densities and associated impacts), Ashdown Forest, and Thetford Forest where this research appears to have been carried out - but suggests that such ‘hotspots’ of high density are not representative of the wider countryside.



Extrapolation of more general levels of deer impact on biodiversity at a national level from results obtained within a study area of perhaps atypically high deer density may lead to somewhat unsafe conclusions about general impact levels.



The assertions about impacts on biodiversity detract from the main message of Dr Dolman’s study: in demonstration of source-sink movements at a landscape scale in response to management.



The British Deer Society is very supportive of active deer management, directed towards ensuring that deer numbers are maintained at densities that are in balance with their habitat and strongly supports a call that co-ordination of such management at a landscape level is to be encouraged.



The British Deer Society welcomes Dr Dolman's references to deer in urban and peri urban environments, where there is a serious problem developing with growing deer populations in areas where practical management is very difficult.



Notes to editors:



1. The BDS is a Registered Charity, formed in 1963, dedicated to the welfare of the six species of wild deer in the UK and Northern Ireland.



2. It has over 6,000 members and supporters with wide and varied interests, but united in the common interest of deer welfare.



3. The Society aims include the promotion of skilful and sensitive management of the deer population.



4. The BDS conducts research and educational programmes to further the aims of the Society.



5. For more details about this release contact Sarah Stride, General Manager on h.q@bds.org.uk or 01425 655434.







The British Deer Society
The Walled Garden
Burgate Manor
Fordingbridge
SP6 1EF
Tel: 01425 655434
Fax: 01425 655433