Guys - as you may have noticed from my response to Sebastien I have had very poor results from my Sako SUPER Hammerheads. Now I believe that these are a new version of the old Hammerhead - a bullet that had quite a good reputation.
Is there anyone out there with experience of the 'Super' Hammerhead that would care to add to this thread?............. English would be good!
Rgds Ian
Posts: 1308 | Location: Devon, UK | Registered: 21 August 2001
I swithched tot he Sako Game-head in 90gr .243Win this season. I have so far taken a couple of foxes and a fallow pricket with them and am very pleased with the results.
I was thinking of moving o the hammer head in 100gr (I think it is the Sako name for the nosler patrtition???)for the hind shooting I have booked in December. I would have liked to get the .308Win on my FAC by then but looks like I won't be able to in time.
Any thoughts on the hammerheads suitability for thew hinds? (or alternative loads in .243?) It's a shame I have to step up the extra 10gr's, as I really like the 90's...
FB
Posts: 4096 | Location: London | Registered: 03 April 2003
Sebastien will haunt you for ignoring the centre of the world I wil lgo for English this time
I have a friend who have used it in 3006 and had a much better result than the old ones. It's a bonded bullet soo performance is about Norma Oryx. It has worked pretty well for him on boars and �LG/Moose
Sako Twinhead is same as Nosler Partition. Hammerhead is made by Sako in Finland. Norma Oryx is much better bullet than Sako Hammerhead or Superhammerhead.
Posts: 18 | Location: Turku, Finland | Registered: 06 April 2002
I think there have been a few problems with the first version of the Sako Super Sammerhead, in some production series. SSH has now been improved,and i think it is fair to compare them to Oryx. The retain weight is not as much as Oryx,but SSH works almost just as well.
Posts: 162 | Location: Norway | Registered: 28 July 2002