Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Guys - as you may have noticed from my response to Sebastien I have had very poor results from my Sako SUPER Hammerheads. Now I believe that these are a new version of the old Hammerhead - a bullet that had quite a good reputation. Is there anyone out there with experience of the 'Super' Hammerhead that would care to add to this thread?............. English would be good! Rgds Ian | ||
|
one of us |
Just wondering. Is the Sako Super Hammerhead the same bulled as the Oryx from Norma ? S�lvi | |||
|
one of us |
I swithched tot he Sako Game-head in 90gr .243Win this season. I have so far taken a couple of foxes and a fallow pricket with them and am very pleased with the results. I was thinking of moving o the hammer head in 100gr (I think it is the Sako name for the nosler patrtition???)for the hind shooting I have booked in December. I would have liked to get the .308Win on my FAC by then but looks like I won't be able to in time. Any thoughts on the hammerheads suitability for thew hinds? (or alternative loads in .243?) It's a shame I have to step up the extra 10gr's, as I really like the 90's... FB | |||
|
new member |
Sako Twinhead is same as Nosler Partition. Hammerhead is made by Sako in Finland. Norma Oryx is much better bullet than Sako Hammerhead or Superhammerhead. | |||
|
one of us |
| |||
|
one of us |
I think there have been a few problems with the first version of the Sako Super Sammerhead, in some production series. SSH has now been improved,and i think it is fair to compare them to Oryx. The retain weight is not as much as Oryx,but SSH works almost just as well. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia