THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM VARMINT HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
22lr bullets on game?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of greghud
posted
looking for some comments regarding how you have found different 22lr bullets.
hollow points opening up, or solids for better hitting power?
also with so many different brands of 22lr bullets the type of lead used will effect the mushrooming?
figure with so many people owning a 22 there should be a welth of experence out there.
greg
 
Posts: 383 | Location: top end oz | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
For shooting rabbits and the like I use 22hp but that said I have killed hundreds for small critters with a plain 22 round nose lead.

For larger critters yotes on up inclueding deer a soild bullet gives better penatration.

But then I prefer head shots on small game so with a head shot it doesn't really make any differance. Hit the brain and they die.
 
Posts: 19741 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of mt Al
posted Hide Post
Sorry for the long response...

Given the same case/powder/manufacturer the velocity/energy calculation difference between solids and HPs are too small to make any differnce, in my opinion. Differences among the manufacturers CCI/Rem/Federal, etc. can be significant however. The impact of an HP bullet on a small carcass, however, is very different vs. a solid.

On a good summer I'll shoot a few thousand rounds of .22lr and I buy copper coated cheepies (I think Federal, about $9 per 400 rounds). I find that my gun jams way less than if I use Remington exposed lead with what appears to be wax on the bullets. Others may have different experiences. Obviously I'm buying for volume and not lethality.

For small gophers (Richardson's ground squirrel) the HPs just make the kill a bit more fun. The rating system is known as the "chunder rating" where the unbiased judges score on amount of chunder dislodged from the victim as well as the distance the chunder travels from same. Solids would kill just the same, just not as fun.

For cotton tail rabbits I can't imagine that it matters for lethality, but I choose solids to reduce damage; I don't like to blow them apart. Also, I like to be pretty close (less than 50 yards) as the .22lr looses energy very fast.

I've found the .22 to be too light for prairie dogs or larger jack rabbits unless you're very close. Not a quick enough kill in my opinion, its easy to loose a jack in high brush or have a prairie dog get down its hole.
 
Posts: 1077 | Location: Bozeman, MT | Registered: 21 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 308Sako
posted Hide Post
My all purpose favorite .22 LR is the CCi Stinger, followed by their Velocitors and last, their Small Game Bullet. The two things which matter most should most likely apply to all game shooting: 1, match the bullet to the game and 2, shot placement. The rest seems to take care of itself.






Member NRA, SCI- Life #358 28+ years now!
DRSS, double owner-shooter since 1983, O/U .30-06 Browning Continental set.
 
Posts: 3611 | Location: LV NV | Registered: 22 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 6.5BR
posted Hide Post
add WW POWERPOINT
 
Posts: 2898 | Registered: 25 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The Quickshok is a pre fragmented Stinger.

It blows away half of a ground squirrel.

Rockchucks don't make it to the hole.

Don't shoot anything with it that you want to eat.

quote:
Unique Terminal Performance on
Varmints. Quik-Shok* is another great varmint
load. It has the same down-range ballistics as Stinger,
but brings a unique bullet design to
the table.
The Quik-Shok segmented
hollow-point bullet is designed
to break up into three segments
on impact for even greater
stopping power. The three segments
diverge from the main path to extend shock
Quik-Shok is an excellent choice for larger var
that require a larger wound area.
Quik-Shok combines flat-shooting with ex
terminal effects. Only the varmints complain
#0064—22 LR Quik-Shok HP
* Quik-Shok is a registered trademark of the PolyWad Corporation.
Used by arrangement.
g
22 LR
QUIK-SHOK® HP
 
Posts: 9043 | Location: on the rock | Registered: 16 July 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TOP_PREDATOR
posted Hide Post
Quickshok are great for small rabbits and possums,very messy clap i wish CCI made them for 22 mag.

I use winchester power points for goats as power points are a lot harder,i also use power points for killing stock cows/pigs on the farm.


"Never in the field of human conflict
was so much owed by so many to so few." Sir Winston Churchill

 
Posts: 1881 | Location: Throughout the British Empire | Registered: 08 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of mt Al
posted Hide Post
As luck would have it I met the guy from Polywad a few weeks ago and he sent me an old box of QuickShok. Can't wait for it to warm up and try them out on gophers! He tells me basically what tnekkcc reports: no survivors.
 
Posts: 1077 | Location: Bozeman, MT | Registered: 21 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
My son has a science project in the works that was to compare the fired weight of different HP ammo from a .22lr. He fired them into water filled milk jugs, and weighed them.

The results were not shocking but it was interesting to me. We found some recovered bullets weighed more than the factory said they weighed in the first place. Penetration for the Remington's was similar to high power rifles firing any other type ammo, and slighty less for the Winchesters, however the Win expanded better without breaking apart, but was inconsistant. The Rem's have smaller frontal dia., and were supposed to weigh 36grs. Win were 37grs. We weighed them as complete rounds for a consistancy check and found them to vary by nearly two grains in only a small sample. I don't have the measurements available but I weighed them on a scientific scale at work.

Rems in grains 36.28,39.27,34.21

Win " " 27.16,27.33,37.5,37.46

I'll see if I can get a pic to post with this. Nate
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Nate,
With Quick-shok, you would have to find all three pieces.
 
Posts: 9043 | Location: on the rock | Registered: 16 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Stingers and Quick Shok are fast and explosive, but not very accurate from my guns. Most standard velocity round nose don't blow up, neither have the Remington 550 round pack hollowpoints I've shot into water. Whatever is most accurate will work.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tyler Kemp:
Stingers and Quick Shok are fast and explosive, but not very accurate from my guns. Most standard velocity round nose don't blow up, neither have the Remington 550 round pack hollowpoints I've shot into water. Whatever is most accurate will work.


You need a hunting chamber, not a target chamber.
I can hit a squirrel as far as the 22 will shoot, ~75 yards.

I recently had to buy a reamer to fix a Green Mountain chamber.
 
Posts: 9043 | Location: on the rock | Registered: 16 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 6.5BR:
add WW POWERPOINT


+1 on the Power Points.




 
Posts: 5798 | Registered: 10 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of greghud
posted Hide Post
i have given plenty of diferent types of .22 ammo a go and found my gun likes the faster loads. the stingers are the 2nd best load for me to the win lazers.
i was hopeing to get some photos of projectiles. anyone???
greg
 
Posts: 383 | Location: top end oz | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
I have a few .22LR pics of my son's experiment, I was surprised a little. I also have one .22 Mag slug recovered from a bobcat.

I'll post some up, I've just been incredibly busy. Nate
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of greghud
posted Hide Post
cool nate, i looking forward to it
greg
 
Posts: 383 | Location: top end oz | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
This is a CCI Mini-Mag .22 Mag from a Ruger 10/22 at about 60 yards. I used this same ammo on coyotes and a bobcat with good success. I do have one recovered bullet, but didn't have time to mess with this stuff last night. Nate
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
I've been using the WW Power Points since they first became available in the states and have nothing but praise for them. With the extremely thin side walls and the gaping hollow cavity, they'll expand to the outer limits of the cartridge's effective range, and it's the only .22 LR Hp that expands consistently from an 8-inch Dan Wesson revolver. It's about the only rimfire ammo that I feed my .22 LR rifles, and the PPs have exhibited excellent accuracy in all of them -- and in a couple rifle, the accuracy actually borders on match grade.

And while I don't consider the .22 LR adequate for predators, I have even taken a couple of incidental coyotes and a feral dog on our farm using the PPs. None ran very far before giving up the ghost (all were chest hits). And several years ago, while running my trapline, I found a water set for 'coon that had been destroyed and pulled up. Tracks told me it was a bobcat. The only gun I was carrying was the Dan Wesson, and I always kept it loaded with 4 .22 shorts and 2 power points since I occasionally located a 'coon sunning itself on cold winter mornings. I didn't have to travel far before I located the 'cat. It had hung up with the trap on some brush, but it appeared as if the stake was about the drop out. If it did, the cat would take off and probably never be found. I was right at 30 yards away, and the only shot I had was to the chest. To my relief, the bullet hit home, and the big tom folded on the spot.


Bobby
Μολὼν λαβέ
The most important thing in life is not what we do but how and why we do it. - Nana Mouskouri

 
Posts: 9443 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of greghud
posted Hide Post
thanks nate.
tell me, the ring is that the front of the hollow point? nice photo.
bt sounds like these win pp's are to good not to try. i will have to chase some up.
thanks all
greg
 
Posts: 383 | Location: top end oz | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by greghud:
thanks nate.
tell me, the ring is that the front of the hollow point? nice photo.
greg


I think it is the remaining portion of the mushroom . It was found with the core piece in the last jug. Here is a pic of a CCI Maxi 40gr. JHP recovered from a bobcat shot at about 12 yards. It had gone through the cat and was found against the hide on the off side. Nate



Here are two of my sons pics of .22lr ammo. He used Rem Golden HP and Winchester Expert HP's they are 36 & 37gr. loads. They penetrated as far at 40 yards as my 7mm RM does at 100!


 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I haven't read this whole thread but I will post this one little bit of info.
Back in Australia we use the .22lr for a lot of shooting, and for head shooting on a lot of larger game too.
I shoot subsonics almost exclusively and back home I always used Winchester Subsonics or a bullet called "Bushmans". Here in Italy I've tried a whole heap of more exotic stuff like Sellier & Ballot and Lapua. The one thing that has stood out is that the Lapua subsonics are not reliable for head shooting deer and pigs. They are louder than the Winchesters, if that's any indication that they are faster but I have had more than one bad experience with them so I am not going to use them anymore. On one occasion a pig took the first slug to the head from about 10m and reared up like a horse might, before I was able to empty the remaining 9 from the 10/22 into the head and kill it. While skinning the head I found about half the slugs hadn't penetrated the bone!
The Winchester subsonics have never let me down and I've seen and done amazing things with them.
I killed a 200kg boar just last week with a single Winchester subsonic to the brain at around 50 meters!
 
Posts: 2286 | Location: Aussie in Italy | Registered: 20 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia