ACCURATERELOADING WISHES A HAPPY WINTER SOLSTICE AND YULE
TO ALL OUR PAGAN, WICCAN AND DRUID MEMBERS
Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Hey Guys, I just posted an article comparing Remington, Winchester and Starline .45-70 brass. I’ve discussed this before on this forum but combined the data, comments and photo into a short article. Those of you with Browning BPCRs in either .40-65 or .45-70 may be especially interested since I included recommendations based on matching brass and chamber dimensions. http://www.texas-mac.com/Compa..._Starline_Brass.html Wayne NRA Life (Benefactor) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF (National Shooting Sports Foundation) Member, Author/Publisher of the Browning BPCR book. | ||
|
One of Us |
TexasMac: I am aware that Ron Long only utilized Remington brass in his chambers for 45-70 or 40-65 chamberings. Winchester brass was too thick and would stick in his chambers. | |||
|
One of Us |
The measurements TexasMac made indicate Winchester brass had the thinnest walls. Supporting that, Winchester brass also had the lowest weight. I don't know what difference an extra .007" in wall thickness really makes but it is no small difference, about +25%, between the Remington and Winchester brass. . | |||
|
one of us |
Its pretty common knowledge that Rem brass has always been thicker than than WW brass,in all cartridges smokeless..Early black powder rounds? I have no idea?, not even sure if Rem and WW ammo was ever produced in black. In smokeless ammo it has always been a rule of thumb for handloaders to load a grain or two less in the Rem cases, all else being equal... Ray Atkinson Atkinson Hunting Adventures 10 Ward Lane, Filer, Idaho, 83328 208-731-4120 rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia