THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FAVORITE LOADS FORUM


Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
.45acp field test
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Ok, admittedly this was not exactly a scientific test, but it wasn’t exactly done off of the cuff either.

I was testing for penetration, expansion and “damage†by 3 rounds that I have in my personal inventory.

Using a Kimber TLE II in .45acp I fired four different kinds of ammunition into a stack of news papers, (undelivered USA Todays still bound in their wrapping) at a range of 7yds.

My control was standard 230gr military ball ammo FMJ.

The first tested round was the Winchester Ranger SXT controlled expansion in 230gr. This is basically the old “black talon†ammo with more politically correct name.

Second, was Winchester 185gr. FMJE + P Truncated Cone (Q4310 if you want to look it up). This is not an expansion round by any means. It is supposed to be a deep penetration round and I have used it to kill hogs on several occasions because of its penetration.

Third was MagSafe 68gr Super Swat http://www.magsafeonline.com/prices_specs.jsp
This is Pre-fragmented Safety Ammunition.

What I found was that the SXT or Black Talon held most of its weight but the “petals†did not expand in the classic mushroom form that you might see in advertisements.

The Winchester Ranger FMJE did a pretty good job of penetration. Basically making a hole as it is designed to do.

However, my question involves the 3rd round tested. The MagSafe penetrated deeper than even the truncated cone FMJ and did more damage than the Winchester SXT (black talon). The “wound chanel†was quite large as compared to theâ€black talon†or the FMJ rounds.
It did not, however, fragment. It stayed in one piece just like the FMJ control round or the Winchester Truncated cone round.
The round fed well and the recoil was almost non-existent but it did not “mushroom†or fragment in any way. Can you give me feed back on this? I have kids in the house and over penetration is a concern should I ever have to use my weapon.

Again, I realize that this was not done in a lab with gelatin and none of the bullets hit anything like bone or body tissue but it was an honest field test without any personal bias one way or the other towards any type of ammunition.


The Hunt goes on forever, the season never ends.

I didn't learn this by reading about it or seeing it on TV. I learned it by doing it.
 
Posts: 729 | Location: Central TX | Registered: 22 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ryan, I think you answered your own question ie. the test material used. This is an interesting point however, because if your MagSafe missed the target and hit drywall instead, it may not fragment but rather act like an FMJ. I believe that this may already have been reported somewhere.
Peter.


Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright, that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong;
 
Posts: 10515 | Location: Jacksonville, Florida | Registered: 09 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yep. Dry newsprint will probably not expand a JHP properly. If you soak the paper in water and try again you should see much different results.


NRA Life Member
testa virtus magna minimum
 
Posts: 345 | Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA | Registered: 01 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have some discontinued Speer 200gr JHP known as the flying ash can or dixie cup that I've loaded in my 45 lc & 45acp brass.This was the favored bullet of the LASO.I gave a hundred of them to a ret le friend to load in his 45acp brass
 
Posts: 1116 | Registered: 27 April 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia