THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Why Not More Interest In The 500/416?
Page 1 2 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Why Not More Interest In The 500/416? Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
I completely agree with Dave and Paul's statements.

Rigby performance in a double. What's not to like?

I don't buy a double based on resale value. I buy what I want to use.

So many are misinformed concerning the pressure of this cartridge. The chamber pressures are in line with other doubles, NOT bolt guns. I don't understand the comments about the caliber's "bottle neck". Why is this an objection. The 470 and the 450/400 are also "bottle neck" cases and no one objects to them.
 
Posts: 8533 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
I don't know squat about the .500/.416 but I do know this...in proper weights for the cartridges they chamber, I have found NONE of the double rifles I've owned to ever have bothersome recoil. My Simson .470 weighed right at 11 pounds and was a pussycat to shoot...even from a bench. Both of my .450s (a Purdey and an A&N CSL) weighed about a half-pound less and were equally easy to shoot. My .577 Nitro (can't remember if that was the Rodda [SP?] or the C&H...) was about 13 pounds (loaded) and was no tiger to handle. My WR .450/.400 HDBL was child's play when it came to recoil.

Me, if I was going back into double rifles for hunting, I'd sell my current 9.3x74R pretend-a-double and just have two...a .450/.400 and a .470, both NEs. I like the old chamberings and even more so, the old rifles they came in.
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
I completely agree with Dave and Paul's statements.

Rigby performance in a double. What's not to like?

I don't buy a double based on resale value. I buy what I want to use.

So many are misinformed concerning the pressure of this cartridge. The chamber pressures are in line with other doubles, NOT bolt guns. I don't understand the comments about the caliber's "bottle neck". Why is this an objection. The 470 and the 450/400 are also "bottle neck" cases and no one objects to them.


I agree with this as well. And this is a good thread outlining that perceived recoil is moderate from multiple users of the cartridge. What’s not to like. From loading straight wall cases one of the things that I like about this one is the bottle neck. What are the perceived problems with bottleneck cases in doubles?
 
Posts: 373 | Location: British Columbia | Registered: 13 April 2012Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Why Not More Interest In The 500/416?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia