On a model 70 big bore, what’s the consensus on bedding techniques? I see some say that pillar bedding weakens the stock since more wood is being hogged out? Is that the case? Or is it better to just glass the lug and rear of the action with no pillars?

I do both. When wood is removed for the pillars, they are held in with epoxy which fills in any gaps and the epoxy is probably stronger than the wood that was removed.

Completely different reason for each, so it is not a one or the other.

quote:

Originally posted by dpcd:
Completely different reason for each, so it is not a one or the other.

I realize the benefits that each offer. But is it better to forgo the benefits that pillar bedding provides for a possibly stronger stock?

Yes. pillar bedding is unnecessary in most cases.

You changed and simplified the answer by including the words "big bore", I suggest tight bedding from one end to the other and two cross bolts ofa big bore intended for Africa or Alaska..I see no reason to piller bed a hunting rifle..BTW as to the recoil lug, its been said that end grain wood is stronger than glass?? I think that may be fact, but wouldn't argue the point, as its meaningless ????

On safari or Alaska hunting I believe glass is needed with cross bolts and a good idea to have a glass bedding kit etc. in your gear in case tembo or nitwit steps or rolls over your prize rifle, its happened many times..