THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Experieces with Gun Blow-Ups and other catastrophic events
Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Experieces with Gun Blow-Ups and other catastrophic events Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
This phenomenon was first described in artillery; has been extensively researched by many, including PO Ackley; it is not just slow powder, but a low density of slow powder that causes "detonation". several theories have been advanced as to cause, including the ones mentioned above, but I doubt if any has been proven. But the phenomenon does occur.
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
RGB,

interesting hypothesis. Back in 1978-79 a gentleman named Caldwell (you would have liked him RGB, he had both eight bore and four bore DR's both by H&H. He even let me shoot them in the Speer test lab in the basement. You haven't lived until you have accidentally "doubled" an eight bore, even with BP loads!!) tried to replicate the SEE phenomenon. Their only success was with about a 50% loading density of 4831 in a 25-06 with a heavy bullet. Their findings pointed at a low density charge that caused the primer flame to "...dance across the horizontal powder column, igniting ONLY the surface portion...causing a back lash-type of secondary ignition of the other half of the charge...the bullet had moved forward into the chamber leade area and stopped...then got hit with the SEE of the other half of the powder charge as it ignited". They suspected that the initial flame racing across the top of the powder column may have somehow "scorched" the outside of the sticks of 4831 and burned off some of the deterrent coating. That would change the burn rate considerably, and that would cause a tremendous pressure spike at the base of the bullet. Made sense to me.

Any here with a chemical background to add to this?

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 523 | Location: wisconsin | Registered: 18 June 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Robgunbuilder
posted Hide Post
This gets more and more intersting. Of course, everyone is well aware of the .38 special blow-up theory in that when 2.8 grs of Bullesye lies loosely scattered in a .38 special shell that a SEE can occur by a surface ignition effect followed by a secondary ignition of the powder and blows up the gun. This apparantly occurs rarely but has been documented. I seem to remember an article in American rifleman on the topic a few years back.
In the .50BMG world, Skip Talbot used to strongly advise us never to load slow powders like VV 20N29 to load densities below 180 grs as a secondary "concussion" could occur. Apparantly this happened to him at some point.
The .50BMG primers are much stronger than std primers and the case has a larger hole to help avoid this problem. Lynnn MCMurdo has shortened the case and moved the shoulder back on his varient of the .50BMG to obtain 100% load densities. I still think this is a good idea.
When we were developing the .600OK we seriously
considered designing the case for the .50BMG primers. I have a few here that I made or altered for these primers just to be on the safe side. In the end, we found we didn't need them but I can assure you it worried me alot.-Rob


Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers to do incredibly stupid things- AH (1941)- Harry Reid (aka Smeagle) 2012
Nothing Up my sleeves but never without a plan and never ever without a surprise!
 
Posts: 6314 | Location: Las Vegas,NV | Registered: 10 January 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Experieces with Gun Blow-Ups and other catastrophic events

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia