One of Us
| I think a Leupold VX3 1.5X5 is a classic and plenty tough. They run 400 so if you wnt to save 100 go with a VX2 1X4...tj3006
freedom1st
|
| |
One of Us
| Will the VX2 stand up to to the recoil ? How about the various scopes that are made for shotguns ? I assume they have o be able to handle heavy recoil. I'm just trying to determine what all scopes I have to choose from. I don't what to buy something that's going to fall apart or not hold zero from recoil though. |
| Posts: 122 | Location: Villa Rica, GA. | Registered: 27 June 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I have used a Leup 1.5-5 successfully on a 458 Lott, but the ultimate in durability is the Leup 2.5x compact. |
| Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The Leupold 2.5x Compact is a classic for handling BIG recoil. The Leupold warranty is a very nice thing to have on a big recoiling rifle too. Cheers... Con |
| Posts: 2198 | Location: Australia | Registered: 24 August 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I just looked for the 2.5 compact and didn't see it listed on midway or midsouth. I saw a 2.5 scout. |
| Posts: 122 | Location: Villa Rica, GA. | Registered: 27 June 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Hello, Shoot a 458Lott quite a bit these days and have the Leupold's and they are tough to beat, but also use Nikon 1.5x4 Monarch and it is around 100 or so bucks cheaper, but can find no fault with it. Well built and optics are really nice. Either one will serve you well I believe. |
| |
One of Us
| Tank, Check out the Leupold site, http://www.leupold.com/products/scopes.asp the 2.5-20mm is under the ultralight heading. I've got one on my CZ .416 Rigby with no problems after 400 rounds. Between the long eye-relief and short occular bell it would be hard to get farther away from your scope and still use the CZ mounting system. |
| Posts: 1928 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 30 November 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I have a Leupold 2.5X shotgun scope on my 458 Lott. Have over 200 rounds through it with no problems so far. It has the heavy duplex reticule.
465H&H |
| Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Thanks guys, I saw the ultralights but didn't think that was the one. I'll probably get one of the Leupolds. I actually wanted a fully adjustable receiver sight but so far, I haven't seen any that are made for the rifle. |
| Posts: 122 | Location: Villa Rica, GA. | Registered: 27 June 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by tank: I'm thinking of putting a scope on my CZ 458 Lott. Which scopes are able to stand up to the recoil that I should be looking at ? I want low power.
No questio the brandnew swarovski Z6 or z6i if you want illumination. The new z6 1-6x24 EE has 6x power and 12,5cm eyerelief... |
| |
One of Us
| Scopes on anything bigger than a 375 H&H does not make sense when big game is shot at close range. If you can't see with open sights out to 50 meters you should not be going after buff or ele. .416/.423/.458" and up is for big dangerous game. Pondoro would have advised you so as well.
Second shots without scopes can be made quicker than with scopes & there is nothing to break or fail. Also no need to scope doubles - just look silly.
Warrior
Warrior |
| Posts: 2273 | Location: South of the Zambezi | Registered: 31 January 2007 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Actually, Many of us have found iron sights totally useless compare to a scope in all situations except a scope failure.
"shoot quick but take your time"
|
| Posts: 451 | Location: drummond island MI USA | Registered: 03 March 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| tank,
Be sure and check the mounting length of the scope you choose. The Nikon Monarch 1.5-4 that driver mentions is a dandy for the money and is a little longer than the Leupold which is helpful mounting. Also, keep the scope weight low to minimize potential scope movement under recoil. |
| Posts: 2627 | Location: Where the pine trees touch the sky | Registered: 06 December 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Warrior. If you have ever been to africa you are probaly a better judge than I am in some regards. But you can only judge from the prespective of your eye site. Another factor is shooting experince. I shoot alot for a city boy, every weekend in the summer. a work buddie of mine thinks scopes are for whimps. But he was a geen beret. Of corse I defend myself by reminding him civilian tax payers like me paid for his marksmanship trining and practice ammo. I have a back up peep on my 45/70, but I can empty that rifle off handed into a pie plate at 100 yards with the 1X4 leupold set on 1. But I can't do as well with the peep. My eyes are nearing 50 years old. ...tj3006
freedom1st
|
| |
one of us
| Thomas, You just need to practice more with good iron sights. My eyes are older than yours....... |
| |
One of Us
| Well, I would love to have a Lyman 66 receiver sight on my new CZ 550 mag just like I have on my Marlin 45/70 but it appears that noboby makes a receiver sight for the CZ. Everything I have seen so far requires modification to make it work. |
| Posts: 122 | Location: Villa Rica, GA. | Registered: 27 June 2003 |
IP
|
|