The Accurate Reloading Forums
Front Sight Blade On ZKK-602/CZ550 Too Low, Options?

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4711043/m/90010377

14 January 2003, 03:52
Nitroman
Front Sight Blade On ZKK-602/CZ550 Too Low, Options?
I purchased ALL 0-14 front sight blades from CZ-USA to try to find the correct height for my .375. I did this to myself after the front blader was badly damaged during shipping and I threw it away before looking at the number on the bottom. [Frown]

I find that when placing the bead in the bottom of the groove, which is the only way I seem to be able to shoot the express style accurately, I have to use the lowest blade. Obviously it is pretty hard to see.

I can live with this but I would like to be able to use a higher blade to see more easily. What are my options?

Thanks for any replies.
14 January 2003, 04:28
<t_bob38>
Any chance the barrel was bent when that front sight was damaged?
14 January 2003, 09:50
HunterJim
Roger,

Perhaps one of our .375 H&H CZ shooters can look at the number on their sight, and let you know what that is.

Mine is a BRNO, and happens to be off at Jim Brockman's to have his Gen III sights fitted. When it comes back next week I can check the sight number. By physical inspection the two sights -- BRNO and CZ -- are the same. We will see.

By the way I may be a pack rat, but I keep stuff like the damaged site in case in might be useful later. [Wink]

jim
15 January 2003, 01:40
<bigdog>
Roger,

I will look at my BRNO 602 375 H&H tonight and look for a number?

BD
15 January 2003, 02:26
Nitroman
Bigdog,

I would appreciate that. It is stamped on the underside of the front sight blade. They are in there pretty tight so if yours doesn't want to move don't force it, I would want someone to break theirs too for my lack of foresight (no pun intended). As I recall mine wasn't as low as it is now. I bought the front sight protector for it too.

Hunterjim, yeah I deserved that [Wink] .

T_bob, I don't think it is bent, it shoots well enough but just the low sight is a drag.

I had thought of spending the money and have a 'smith take off a few 0.001's from the rear "V". Before I get into big dollar work I will explore the alternatives...like living with it!!

[ 01-14-2003, 17:28: Message edited by: Roger Rothschild ]
15 January 2003, 16:01
<bigdog>
Roger,

Mine is really tight, so I'll take your foresite and not force it. But if I take the scope off and use the sights the 200 & 300 blades are perfect, and the fixed blade make the front sight feel low.

I had another ZKK-602 which I bought without the front sight. I could not find a suitable blade so I had my smith install a shotgun bead where the blade normally would go. He D & T'd the flat spot behind the push button on the front sight. I kind of like the shotgun bead?

Just my .02 worth Roger

BD

[ 01-15-2003, 07:02: Message edited by: bigdog ]
16 January 2003, 13:23
Nitroman
Thanks for trying Bigdog, appreciate the effort.

I wish New England Custom Gun would make one of their Ruger style peeps for the ZKK. That is a very clean, well thought out design. It would be much less expensive than a good scope; then I could remove that express-mess on the barrel.
16 January 2003, 13:49
<JoeR>
Roger, what caliber do you have? If you need the lowest blade, you may have a stock problem. Even without one, bedding the stock (a must on the bigger calibers) invariable leads to using a higher front. Could solve two problems at once.
16 January 2003, 14:04
Nitroman
Joe,
This was a .375 H&H and I had it rechambered to .375 Weatherby. It is bedded tip to tang.
16 January 2003, 15:30
Martin@Hin
Roger

375 BRNO sight # 0
sight height .248"

Martin
16 January 2003, 19:44
Nitroman
Martin,

Thank you Sir. That is the sight I have too. Thanks again.
17 January 2003, 12:55
DHUF
The sight on my CZ 550 375 H&H is makked #4 it shoots just fine.
Doyle