The Accurate Reloading Forums
404 Jeffery & 375 HH secondary recoil lug needed?
18 December 2007, 07:46
FAST996404 Jeffery & 375 HH secondary recoil lug needed?
A have a couple projects starting a 404 & 375. Should I have secondary recoil lugs on the rifles. Both are post 64 classic actions.
"A long life, and the good sense to live it." ...Quintis Arrius
375H&H,404J,416DAK,458AFR,416RIG,450RIG,505GIB
Avatar: Gregory Peck & Susan Hayward in Africa
NRA member
18 December 2007, 08:18
RIPNope, not necessary in such gentle rifles.
They will have more accuracy potential without the block on the barrel, but could be good enough with the block on the barrel too.
If I planned for walnut stocks I would just use two good crossbolts and pillared glass bedding, and no secondary recoil lug on the barrel.
In a synthetic like McMillan, even more so: No secondary recoil lug needed.
18 December 2007, 09:16
FAST996quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
Nope, not necessary in such gentle rifles.
Good. Now on my 416 & 450 rigby I know the answer. That 450 will be as gentle as a Cape Buff.
"A long life, and the good sense to live it." ...Quintis Arrius
375H&H,404J,416DAK,458AFR,416RIG,450RIG,505GIB
Avatar: Gregory Peck & Susan Hayward in Africa
NRA member
19 December 2007, 09:27
RIPThe SIGARMS Mauser 98 Magnum in 450 Dakota has no secondary recoil lug on the barrel.
The Ruger RSM's in .458 Lott have only one recoil lug.
Dakota built/builds their 450 Dakota M76 rifles with no secondary recoil lug on the barrel, just the action recoil lug.
Personally, if I had my druthers I would want a primary action lug and secondary barrel lug on anything of .458 caliber or larger, .458 WinMag and up.
19 December 2007, 10:10
gumboot458.......I know RIP,s da man but I would want one ,..I don,t have one on my 9.3x64 Bren , but it is permanatly muzzel broke ...

.If it can,t be grown , its gotta be mined ....