THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Opinions on Potential New Big Bore Project

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Opinions on Potential New Big Bore Project Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I hinted to this in my 10.6X52R wildcatted MN rifle thread.

I am thinking of having the barrel, seen in the proceeding pic, rebored to 0.411" and chambered in 405 Win. If you know what the barrel is for you will understand why some might consider this a twisted project. Personally, I think it would be cool. Looks like I can 20 rounds in the magazine, maybe even more, I only have 20, 405 Winnies loaded up right now.



Anyway, let me have it. Does this "idea" place me into the "mentally ill, in need of immediate professional help catagory", or do you agree with me that it is cool.

Scott
 
Posts: 1662 | Location: USA | Registered: 27 November 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Here is shot of the a magazine for the rifle filled with 20 405 Winchester cartridges. Those are 300 gr Hornady FP at a COL of 3.165". That is a 30-06 on the right and a 6" scale on the left. There is another magazine for the rifle on the left as well.



I think this would be a serious, and I mean serious pig gun!

Scott
 
Posts: 1662 | Location: USA | Registered: 27 November 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 8MM OR MORE
posted Hide Post
It looks like feeding issues to be resolved to me. Your right, it should be a fun gun.
 
Posts: 1944 | Location: Moses Lake, WA | Registered: 06 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Having been accused of being insane myself ... and having attempted various conversions of both the AR-15 and AR-10, let me offer these thoughts:

Rimmed cases are a pain .... and when you go to straightwall, trying to feed from a mag like this, they tend to be an even bigger pain. The 44 Mag in the AR15 was such a disaster, 3 working rifles were built.

The magazine and barrel look familiar and as such, the rimmed case might work. But why not try the 400 Whelen AI? Easier to come by in terms of brass, and should give similar performance. And you may not need any new reamers, this one should be out there already, someone is bound to have done the AI of the 400 Whelen.

Good luck, and mercy be with the pigs
 
Posts: 327 | Location: Texas | Registered: 22 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Here's my opinion, Scott.


Another load of your bullshit! I wish I had a dollar for every great project you CLAIM you are starting. Somehow they never get finished, do they Scott?

If you want a REAL new project, learn to tell the truth.

-------------------------------


Isn't there some sort of pill for pathological liars? I'll tell you boys, this Scott fellow is a sick puppy. He needs our help!
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Marty,

I figured you would recognize those peices. I don't want to have to change out bolts, just barrels. This means I need a rim diameter of ~ 0.54". Perhaps a 404 Jeffery Short. The 405 is a bit wide at the mouth to feed reliably from the stock magazines. I think if I split the magazine and remove the forward bead (depression in the side of the magazine) I can solve the width issue.

Do you have any interesting wildcats in the .416 - .458 range with a COL of 3.15" and a rim diameter of .54"? Perhaps, we could cook something up in the future?

Scott
 
Posts: 1662 | Location: USA | Registered: 27 November 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Bren gun?
 
Posts: 273 | Location: Clarks Summit, Pa. | Registered: 17 December 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
This implies that you own a functioning Bren gun, not just a parts kit or a DEWAT. Date-stamped photos of the gun firing would help everyone to believe that.
 
Posts: 12 | Location: Canada | Registered: 04 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
What is a DEWAT?

Scott
 
Posts: 1662 | Location: USA | Registered: 27 November 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
DEWAT means Deactivated War Trophy.
 
Posts: 12 | Location: Canada | Registered: 04 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Scott, why dont you make a 458 winmag or 416 talor outta a vz 24or something?
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
smallfry,

Two reasons:

1) Been there, done that.

2) Too easy.

Regards,
ScottS
 
Posts: 1662 | Location: USA | Registered: 27 November 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Now I can understand the "been there done that" but I am not sure what you mean by too easy? When Building a custom rifle, a person could not put too much skill or thought into perfection of the rifle. I kinda look at it as a maturation process. Now a guy would have to stop at some point, but if you have already made a rifle to that degree of skill, why not take it to "the next level" whatever that might be? I am not flaming anyone... just never heard of art,skill,metalsmithing, and rifle building being too easy. Maybe I am missing your point or something.
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Smallfry, please don't hold your breath for this pathological lair ScottS to "complete" a project. He never completes anything but BS posts here on AR. He's never been anywhere or done anything. The last 2 weeks alone he has babbled about 4 separate "new projects" and I suppose by next week we shall see him announce a few more. Hahahahaha

Pure bullshit.

Hey, ScottS! Show us the 500 AHR project from last year.
 
Posts: 19677 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Marty,

I figured you would recognize those peices. I don't want to have to change out bolts, just barrels. This means I need a rim diameter of ~ 0.54". Perhaps a 404 Jeffery Short. The 405 is a bit wide at the mouth to feed reliably from the stock magazines. I think if I split the magazine and remove the forward bead (depression in the side of the magazine) I can solve the width issue.

Do you have any interesting wildcats in the .416 - .458 range with a COL of 3.15" and a rim diameter of .54"? Perhaps, we could cook something up in the future?

Scott




Regarding the parts and the later question on DEWAT, one can get 80% receivers for several of these weapons and turn them into functioning rifles. If one omits the part that makes it FULL auto, this is perfectly legal and requires no more than a Form 1. With the recent ruling by the 9th District Court, even FULL auto for PRIVATE USE ONLY should be feasible in a state that allows just that. We already have several Form 1 MGs sent to ATF for review and possible approval. Case in point would be the 80% M1918A2 under my work bench ....

On the 458 caliber round, 3.15" long, with 0.54" rim - I suggest not reinventing the wheel, and ask John about his 458 WSM, it would fit the bill perfectly (a little bit shorter, but who cares, seat the 500 grainers out there) and brass is easy to come by. For this same reason I was looking at redoing a MN in a WSM cartridge, but then came across the 6.5x54R and am trawling (not trolling eventhough they exist in the Northern European culture) for a reamer with my counterparts in Finland ....

Pecos - give it a rest already
 
Posts: 327 | Location: Texas | Registered: 22 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of gsp
posted Hide Post
Marty, I have 2 80% castings and 1 0% forging I,m working on in spare time. Do you know of a list for the states that allow form 1 mg's for post 1986 mg's ?
It's my understanding that you must have a manufacture's license to build and own a mg that is built after 1986.
 
Posts: 880 | Registered: 18 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Marty, I have 2 80% castings and 1 0% forging I,m working on in spare time. Do you know of a list for the states that allow form 1 mg's for post 1986 mg's ?
It's my understanding that you must have a manufacture's license to build and own a mg that is built after 1986.




I do not know the states as is, but it is those that A) full under the 9th District Court and B) allow MGs and other NFA items.

Indeed, the OLD way stated that any MG made after 86 required SOT and would be deemed a POST-86 Dealer Sample (or a Postie). However, this new RULING of the 9th overturns that old INTERPRETATION by the ATF. Interesting how they went about it, using Interstate Commerce and not the 2nd Amendment as the crux. Have not heard of any of these Form 1 getting approved YET, but then again, I think ATF may have gotten swamped (and our examiner is not the brightest ...)

Now, the MG that you build will be NON-Transferable, period. But who cares, if it means several hours of your own time in the shop versus $16K for a transferable M60 ...

If I hear of any approved Form 1 MGs I will let you know.
 
Posts: 327 | Location: Texas | Registered: 22 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of gsp
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Now, the MG that you build will be NON-Transferable, period. But who cares, if it means several hours of your own time in the shop versus $16K for a transferable M60 ...



I agree, please let me know if any get approved.
Thanks
 
Posts: 880 | Registered: 18 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Smallfry,

I am not an engraver, and I do not desire to be. Nor am I a stocker, and I do not desire to be. I am not being a smart ass, just telling it how it is. However, as I see it, these are the only two areas in which Mauser rifles require any great degree of craftsman skill. I consider Mauser rifles are relatively easy to build. The reason being, all the parts one needs to build a top notch mauser rifle (metal wise anyway) are readily available on the aftermarket (triggers, bottom metal, etc). So mausers, to me anyway, are all about assembling an assortment of purchased components, not about making things from scratch, etc, etc. Assembly of parts is not, typically, too aweful difficult.

This was the reason for the Mosin Nagant project, which will most likely commence sometime this spring. There are few if any "off the shelf" parts for the MN. Therefore, the challenge level of a truly "custom" MN rifle is much greater than it is with a Mauser rifle.

By the way, I am not going to do anything with the barrel I pictured earlier. I shall leave it stock.

Marty, have you considered adapting any of your big bore auto-loader wildcats to the FAL platform.

Scott
 
Posts: 1662 | Location: USA | Registered: 27 November 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Marty, have you considered adapting any of your big bore auto-loader wildcats to the FAL platform.

Scott




Yes, BUT ... the FAL bolt does not have much metal left to allow it to be opened to anything greater than the current rim size. In addition, the magazine has a different configuration than those in the AR series and the FAL mags are not as receptive to "other calibers" - they won't feed worth a flip. I will be checking out the DSA booth at SHOT Thursday as rumor has it they have modified the FAL to accept the WSM round .... that opens up many new avenues ...

Then there is the issue with the upper of the FAL being the papered section and I hate paper work .....
 
Posts: 327 | Location: Texas | Registered: 22 July 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Opinions on Potential New Big Bore Project

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia