Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I have been investigating the strength of various double shotgun/rifle designs using FEA. The load I'm applying is the SAAMI rated pressure for the cartridge over the diameter of the case head (not the rim ). I realize under normal firing conditions the case grips the chamber walls thus the backthrust is greatly reduced. In comparison to bolt action rifles O/U and SxS have no where near the safety factor. In fact most exhibit stress beyond the yield point of 4140 steel when loaded per above. I'm limited by my ability to get accurate dimensions for the double rifles of today such as Searcy's other than scaling from photo's. I have made comparisons for various options such as crossbolts, side clips, double underlugs. If you have two underlugs the rear most one sees most of the load. If you have double underlugs and crossbolts, the cross bolts see the highest stress and have seen none that would not yield ( based of measurements taken from Greener 12ga shotguns ). I have taken the diameter of the crossbolt to .375" I suspect they are fitted loose to allow the rear lug to be loaded first and only used for safety. I don't like loading crossbolted actions quickly I tend to snag my thumb on them. Side clips are questionable, when one barrel fires the other barrel is pushed into the breechface as it tries to twist ( pivoting about the hinge pin laterally ), unless the clearance is excessive to achieve this. O/U designs are not necessiarily stronger. Due to the upper barrel above the hinge pin they tend to load the hinge pin harder than SxS's do. Hinge pin diameter and location relative to the breech face and barrel centerline and lug closest to breechface seem to be the most significant design variables. I have not checked bifurcated lumps but intend to do so, A friend has a Ruger O/U. 12ga I originally started this investigation as I wanted to convert a shotgun to rifle but will refrain from doing so until I can get and idea of acceptable load criteria. Any Help?????? What is the design safety criteria for such a rifle when determining the loads it should withstand thrust wise? What pressure vs. maximum should be used over what the particular cartride is rated for ( proof psi)???? And Yes I'm a LEO too. Maybe there should be a page just for us. | ||
|
One of Us |
Quote: Jeffe Get your hound dog nose onto this fellow. Tries to talk like an engineer, talks about steel types, claims to be anLEO etc. And responds to 500AHR (ie ToadE's) post. DemoSam - are you ToadE again? | |||
|
one of us |
Jeffe "Get your hound dog nose onto this fellow. Tries to talk like an engineer, talks about steel types, claims to be anLEO etc. And responds to 500AHR (ie ToadE's) post. DemoSam - are you ToadE again? " Sorry to disappoint you. I left the automotive engineering world years ago. Don't engineers drive trains anyway???? I'm seeking information as stated in my post. And disagree with the general statement O/U's are stronger than SxS an engineer would say "it depends" which would put me in opposition with ToadE and others no offence meant to them. Know if you have a big double and could share some information I would appreciate it, you seem to be holding one. Such as hinge pin diameter, location of hinge pin from breech face. Distance from hinge pin to rear lug. Size and angles of cutouts of lug groove. With the amount of posters stating how these designs have to be smithed every so often I'm inclined to believe they are somewhat underdesigned compared to bolt rifles. | |||
|
Moderator |
Sam, I am working on making one, either from a shotgun or from scratch.... and plan on using 4340, rather than 4140, even though i'll give up time/fpm/ease of use to a degree. so, let's see how things go, pleasE? We've had loads of trolls under various names, and we are a tad gunshy when things jive/don't match up. jeffe | |||
|
One of Us |
Quote: They are fine looking rifles indeed and any man with taste would be proud to own them. However, if I purchase a 250 year old Brown Bess musket in excellent condition, does that mean that it is more durable or longer lasting than a new production Sako? I am not knocking antique British doubles, but there is a world of difference between the steels of today and the steels of yesteryear. That is why we do not convert WWI mausers to cartridges like 7mm stw, although they hold up to 8x57 just fine. | |||
|
one of us |
Demosam, I can provide the dimensions you are asking for; however, you will need many more dimensions if you are to conduct an accurate/correct FEA of the action. I will provide you with dimensional data you have requested, for a medium bore SXS double rifle of continental manufacture. Medium bore meaning less than .458 bore diameter. The rifle is a sidelock. I would appreciate it if you could answer the following questions for me though to appease my curiosity: 1.) What and where is the maximum stress that you have calculated from the FEAs you have run on SXS actions so far? 2.) What material and material properties are you assuming for these SXS actions? 3.) What and where is the maximum stress and that you have calculated from the FEAs you have run on bolt actions? 4.) What bolt actions have you considered? 5.) For the matter what SXS actions have you considered? 6.) What material and material properties have you assumed for the bolt actions? By the way, the third fastener, ie Greener cross bolt, is supposed to be loose. It's function is to increase the total bolting spring rate after a certain initial action deflection has occurred. If done properly the cross bolt can minimize the potential of plastic deformation of the underbolting due to excessive action deflection (opening) during firing. The hinge pin and shoe should be appropriately sized in the first place to handle the stresses they are exposed to. Mickey, I agree with you. Double rifles are "finer things in life" ;therefore, they should be finer! The rifles you have posted look exquisite, appealing to eye, fit the like a finely taylored suit, trim and properly balanced, etc, etc. The Searcy is a workman's tool, much like a Savage bolt action, crude but effective. Thanks, Scott | |||
|
one of us |
To answer your questions. The stresses thus far have been beyond yield for 4140 QTSR with a yield strength at 130,000 psi. I'm using linear FEA so the results are only valid to that point. Which is causing me to question the loads I'm applying and dimensions of actual double rifles. The bolt actions were Rem dimensions and a McMillan 50 bmg with info off Lilja's site in his lug shear article. When I did them the stresses were around 50% to 80% of yield which would be on the face of the bolt lug. I do not remember anything more specific and only modeled the bolt. I believe Dan Lilja also used the case head DIA and SAAMI pressure to estimate an applied force load. The modulus of the material is whats important with FEA and most carbon steels have the same modulus, but different yield strengths. The Data for the SXS's were taken from shotguns 12 and 20 gauge's at the local gunshops he has Parkers and a Greener. The SxS I guessed would have around a 1.2" barrel dia near the breech and I started moving parts around to see what the stresses were and what was significant. Your help is appreciated and check your PM I'll try to send you a pic. Thanks | |||
|
one of us |
Demosam, Why don't you email Saeed and request that he post your FEA stress plot results so all can see. I think many here at AR are interested in your results. The dimensional data you requested. I added a few additional items, but I believe you will need much more to accurately calculate the action stresses. This rifle has no third bite and is a sidelock action with double Purdey underbites, it is a SXS. Here it is: (CL means centerline) 1.) Hinge pin diameter - 8mm (case hardened steel) 2.) CL hinge pin to standing breech - 48 mm 3.) CL hinge pin to CL of rear bite - 45 mm 4.) CL hinge pin to center of front bite - 19 mm 5.) Size & angle of rear bite - 9mm Wide X 5mm High (parallel to bore) 6.) Size of front bite is the same as rear bite. 7.) CL of bore to CL of rear bite - 20 mm 8.) CL of barrel to CL of barrel - 26 mm 9.) Width of barrels - 52.5 mm 10.) Width of action - 40.7 mm Cartridge maximum average pressure (CIP) - 280 N/mm^2 Thrust area of case - 107.2 mm^2 Thrust force - 30,021 N The lump in this rifle is Rc 29 - 31 depending upon were one measures it. The barrels do as well. Please share the results with us all. Again I think if you email the stress plot to Saeed he can get it posted here for us. Scott | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia