THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY: Barnes Bullets
Page 1 2 3 4 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY: Barnes Bullets Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have several boxes that have that same type of label. Haven't shot any of them yet but the bases don't look like that.
 
Posts: 4214 | Location: Southern Colorado | Registered: 09 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boarkiller
posted Hide Post
Love Barnes never had trouble with them
That said, nobody perfect and everyone will piss off customer or two in their lifetime
Got two elephants with side shot that went right thru the whole head, gone.


There will always be something and it is good to bring issues up so we are all aware of potential problem


" Until the day breaks and the nights shadows flee away " Big ivory for my pillow and 2.5% of Neanderthal DNA flowing thru my veins.
When I'm ready to go, pack a bag of gunpowder up my ass and strike a fire to my pecker, until I squeal like a boar.
Yours truly , Milan The Boarkiller - World according to Milan
PS I have big boar on my floor...but it ain't dead, just scared to move...

Man should be happy and in good humor until the day he dies...
Only fools hope to live forever
“ Hávamál”
 
Posts: 13376 | Location: In mountains behind my house hunting or drinking beer in Blacksmith Brewery in Stevensville MT or holed up in Lochsa | Registered: 27 December 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of michael458
posted Hide Post
Most of us know that Barnes is not really "Barnes" anymore...... I have not been a fan of barnes since the RN BS a couple of years ago, which would have NEVER occurred had barnes not sold out to I believe its called the "Freedom Group", or something like that? Correct me if wrong, as I do not always keep up with exactly who is who and what....... But as I understand same group or company owns Remington, Marlin, Dakota, and more perhaps... along with barnes now.....

I was told something completely insane yesterday....... And the only reason I mention this is it might be a trend with this group or company that owns barnes as well..... Some company had contracted with SSK to build 10 45/70 Whispers on new Marlin rifles....... 8 out of 10 of these rifles sent to SSK had rifling only on ONE SIDE of the barrel, and none on the other side...... Barrels were oblong inside...... 8 new rifles out of 10......... Brian said in all his years he had never even seen anything like this....... One might expect some issues or something crazy with 1 out of 10.... But People, this is 8 out of 10 rifles that only had rifling on one side of the barrel and smooth on the other side... I can't even imagine how something like that can occur........... Not only that, but went out the door as new rifles.........

Possibly a trend with this group or company that owns barnes, marlin, and the rest... GOD I HOPE THEY DON"T BUY WINCHESTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just FYI......

Michael


http://www.b-mriflesandcartridges.com/default.html

The New Word is "Non-Conventional", add "Conventional" to the Endangered Species List!
Live Outside The Box of "Conventional Wisdom"

I do Not Own Any Part of Any Bullet Company, I am not in the Employ Of Any Bullet Company. I do not represent, own stock, nor do I receive any proceeds, or monies from ANY BULLET COMPANY. I am not in the bullet business, and have no Bullets to sell to you, nor anyone else.
 
Posts: 8426 | Location: South Carolina | Registered: 23 June 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Freedom Group's traveling QA Inspectors, Rufus and Lemuel struck again at Marlin?

faint

 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of buckeyeshooter
posted Hide Post
Heck, I think they live there! hilbily
 
Posts: 5727 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
No news from Barnes is not good news.
Caveat emptor.


Freedom isn't free, but you are free to buy at the prices below, Cabela's retail store.

Rufus and Lemuel inspected and relabeled some of the stock on the shelves in the South Denver, near Castlerock, CO, Cabela's store.
I was there and whipped out my iphone for some mile-high inventory checking last Saturday.



Oops, sumbuddy busted into one of the not-relabeled boxes, and left the relabeled one alone.
"I didn't do it!" Like Bart Simpson, Rufus, and Lemuel are always saying ...



 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I received a call from Barnes yesterday. They have the .411 bullets and are inspecting them.


(You can't fix stupid)
Falls of Rough Ky University
Our victory cry is FORK U!
 
Posts: 218 | Location: Falls of Rough, KY | Registered: 29 June 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JustOneMoreShot
posted Hide Post
Interesting reading and pictures. I will be following along and am interested in an outcome.
 
Posts: 54 | Location: GA USA | Registered: 16 February 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Update: Ryan from Barnes called yesterday. When segregated, the heavily marked bullets shot the same size group as the lightly marked bullets. They shot to "almost" the same point of impact. No word on the out-of-roundness that I measured. He stated that the inaccuracy that I experienced must be due to some other cause.


(You can't fix stupid)
Falls of Rough Ky University
Our victory cry is FORK U!
 
Posts: 218 | Location: Falls of Rough, KY | Registered: 29 June 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by roughone:
Update: Ryan from Barnes called yesterday. When segregated, the heavily marked bullets shot the same size group as the lightly marked bullets. They shot to "almost" the same point of impact. No word on the out-of-roundness that I measured. He stated that the inaccuracy that I experienced must be due to some other cause.
Interesting...

So basically the corporate answer is, "Your reloading skills must suck because our bullets are ok."


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
Geez, I wasn't going to but I can't help myself.

To hear "same group size", "almost same point of aim" I immediately think of my 12gauge SxS shotgun not my single barrel rifle using the same loading and same box of bullets!

So far I'm not impressed with Barnes' followup...


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by roughone:
Update: Ryan from Barnes called yesterday. When segregated, the heavily marked bullets shot the same size group as the lightly marked bullets. They shot to "almost" the same point of impact. No word on the out-of-roundness that I measured. He stated that the inaccuracy that I experienced must be due to some other cause.



So Lemuel and Rufus are doing the PR and correspondence work too, with secondary QA testing on obviously bad product,
trying to say they pass QA second time around too?

This is extremely weak work by Barnes.

This is why there needs to be some separation of duties in Freedom Group.
Lemuel and Rufus need to go on vacation (or back to school) at least one month annually.
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post

Group with bullets with ring on the base.


group with no ring on the base.

The point of impact was vertically within .38 inches and horizontally .28 inches. with 2, 10 shot groups. I would say that is almost the same point of impact. The group of bullets with the rings on the base shot .110 inches better than the group with no rings. The run out on the noses is .0004 inches.

As far as the stickers with sku numbers. We changed accounting software last year, and because of that it was necessary to update the sku numbers. many customers became confused with the new number, being unsure if the product was the same, so for the transition period we are putting the sticker on them to show both the old and new sku number.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: 14 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ouch....
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Barnes Bullets:

Group with bullets with ring on the base.


group with no ring on the base.

The point of impact was vertically within .38 inches and horizontally .28 inches. with 2, 10 shot groups. I would say that is almost the same point of impact. The group of bullets with the rings on the base shot .110 inches better than the group with no rings. The run out on the noses is .0004 inches.

As far as the stickers with sku numbers. We changed accounting software last year, and because of that it was necessary to update the sku numbers. many customers became confused with the new number, being unsure if the product was the same, so for the transition period we are putting the sticker on them to show both the old and new sku number.
Much better than my shotgun. tu2

Is your acoustic capture accomplished at 50yds or 100yds?

Thanks,

Oh yes, welcome to the AR Forums!


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
100 yards
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: 14 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Barnes Bullets:
100 yards
Thank you...


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of graybird
posted Hide Post
Welcome to the forum, Barnes!

It'll be interesting to see the direction this topic takes now!


Graybird

"Make no mistake, it's not revenge he's after ... it's the reckoning."
 
Posts: 3722 | Location: Okie in Falcon, CO | Registered: 01 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Any answer on the damaged bases?
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Blacktailer
posted Hide Post
Barnes,
Welcome to the forum and thank you for wading into the fray.
Not often we have a manufacturer take time to respond.


Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 3831 | Location: Cave Creek, AZ | Registered: 09 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I thought they were accuracy enhancing love rings.
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
......and any chance of a 60'ish 6mm TTSX?
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
So not to worry about bullets that make a "clack-clack-clack" sound with three revolutions rolling across a glass countertop?
One clack for each turn of the bullet, is OK rather than a constant purring noise like with a GSC bullet?

And any asymmetry or irregularity of the bullet base, variable from one bullet to the next is to be ignored,
as long as the fox in the chicken coop says so?

I do not think so!

No explanation yet as to why some Barnes Bullets have marred bases and some do not?

 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
So after shooting the "duds" Rusty shot groups with the ones that didn't clank on the coffee table and everything was kosher?
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
So far, our .338" 225 gn TTSX and .416" 350 gn TTSX have been excellent.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
RIP, have you shot any of these bullets?



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
So not to worry about bullets that make a "clack-clack-clack" sound with three revolutions rolling across a glass countertop?
One clack for each turn of the bullet, is OK rather than a constant purring noise like with a GSC bullet?

And any asymmetry or irregularity of the bullet base, variable from one bullet to the next is to be ignored,
as long as the fox in the chicken coop says so?

I do not think so!

No explanation yet as to why some Barnes Bullets have marred bases and some do not?

 
Posts: 4 | Registered: 14 August 2014Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Barnes Bullets:
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
So not to worry about bullets that make a "clack-clack-clack" sound with three revolutions rolling across a glass countertop?
One clack for each turn of the bullet, is OK rather than a constant purring noise like with a GSC bullet?
And any asymmetry or irregularity of the bullet base, variable from one bullet to the next is to be ignored,
as long as the fox in the chicken coop says so?

I do not think so!

No explanation yet as to why some Barnes Bullets have marred bases and some do not?



The marks on the bases are cosmetic imperfections, they should not happen and the issue has been addressed. I told you the run out is 4 ten thousands, what is the run out on your glass table, where do you check the run out when using a glass table. The bullets that where sent to us, and the bullets we have here did NOT do that, RIP we would gladly check the bullets YOU are checking on the table if you would like to send them in to be checked. But I have the feeling nothing we do or test will satisfy you. You know when you posted this originally for the gentleman with the problem you grossly exaggerated the issues (at least according to him). So who knows what your problem actually is. We brought in the bullets we tested them, we shot them and showed what they did.

Guys trust me when I say we want these bullets to be great, we do not want bad bullets or dissatisfied customers, we are constantly looking into ways to improve, and we take the issues that come up seriously. The Plant Manager personally has looked into these bullets, and is/has addressed the problem, "Rufus, and Lemuel" have both been actively involved in correcting the cosmetic issues. Barnes is more than willing to work with our customers on concerns they have, and we want to hear about the problems so we can get them fixed. We are NOT "corporate" and we will work to get issues solved, but one of the best ways to get the problem solved is to get to the root of the problem and for that we need the most accurate information we can get, a generic they "don't shoot good" or they go clakity clack is not all the information we need. I know that may be all the information a customer has, so please contact us so we can help.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: 14 August 2014Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Can anyone say, excellant customer service?
Now that's the way to put out a flaming topic.

Paul K


Take Trophies - Leave Brass
 
Posts: 767 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 22 January 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
New slogan:

BARNES BULLETS
"Knocking the wind outta shit for 25 years"
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
16bore,

which Barnes bullets are you having problems with?

Or, are you perhaps, just a pile-on shit disturber?

Barnes is addressing the situation as one would expect them to.
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Zero problems Richard. Ever. You? Maybe you can use your contacts to get me some ~60gr 6mm's. Oh wait, its a sad time for Barnes, I forgot. Nevermind.
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Barnes Bullets:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnes Bullets:
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
So not to worry about bullets that make a "clack-clack-clack" sound with three revolutions rolling across a glass countertop?
One clack for each turn of the bullet, is OK rather than a constant purring noise like with a GSC bullet?
And any asymmetry or irregularity of the bullet base, variable from one bullet to the next is to be ignored,
as long as the fox in the chicken coop says so?

I do not think so!

No explanation yet as to why some Barnes Bullets have marred bases and some do not?



The marks on the bases are cosmetic imperfections, they should not happen and the issue has been addressed.

WRONG. THE BULLET BASES ARE NOT MERELY COSMETICALLY MARRED. THEY ARE VISIBLY DEFORMED, OUT OF ROUND BY EYEBALL.


I told you the run out is 4 ten thousands, what is the run out on your glass table, where do you check the run out when using a glass table. The bullets that where sent to us, and the bullets we have here did NOT do that, RIP we would gladly check the bullets YOU are checking on the table if you would like to send them in to be checked. But I have the feeling nothing we do or test will satisfy you.

You know when you posted this originally for the gentleman with the problem you grossly exaggerated the issues (at least according to him).

THE BOLDED SENTENCE IMMEDIATELY ABOVE IS A BALD-FACED LIE. QUOTE MR. MCGEE IF YOU CAN, I WILL CERTAINLY SPEAK TO HIM ABOUT YOUR STATEMENTS. I DEFINITELY UNDERSTATED THE PROBLEMS THAT RUSTY MCGEE , GUNSMITH AND DEGREED MECHANICAL ENGINEER COMPLAINED OF, UNSOLICITED BY ME ON A ROUTINE VISIT TO HIS SHOP. I TOOK HIS WORDS FOR TRUTH AND STILL DO. HE IS CAPABLE OF PRECISION MEASUREMENTS I AM NOT CAPABLE OF. THE ROLL ACROSS THE GLASS COUNTERTOP AT HIS SHOP WAS MY IMPERTINENCE, I RECKON, BUT AGREES WITH HIS CONCENTRICITY CHECKS, NOT YOUR HOME COOKING.


So who knows what your problem actually is.

MY PROBLEM IS THAT YOU STILL HAVE NOT EXPLAINED WHY THE DEFORMED BULLETS ARE SHOWING UP NOW. I PRESUME YOU CANNOT REVEAL, FOR PROPRIETARY REASONS, THE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY INVOLVING USING AN UNDERSIZED PUNCH TO PUSH A BULLET THROUGH A SIZING DIE AFTER THE INITIAL PRECISION MACHINING FROM COPPER ROD, OR HAMMERRING A COPPER SLUG INTO SHAPE BEFORE CUTTING THE MULTIPLE CANNELURES ON THE BULLET TO RESEMBLE DRIVING BANDS?

We brought in the bullets we tested them, we shot them and showed what they did.

NOW HOW ABOUT SENDING RUSTY A REFUND FOR THE TWO BOXES OF BULLETS FOR WHICH HE IS OUT OF POCKET? FORGET THE WASTE OF HIS TIME AND POWDER AND HIS PAIN AND SUFFERING CAUSED BY THE ANGUISH OF THINKING HIS SHOOTING WAS SO BAD, UNTIL HE MEASURED THOSE BULLETS AND GOT RESULTS FAR DIFFERENT FROM WHAT YOU PURPORT. RUSTY IS A GREAT SHOT, A SHOOTING COACH TO MANY, INCLUDING ME.

Guys trust me when I say we want these bullets to be great, we do not want bad bullets or dissatisfied customers, we are constantly looking into ways to improve, and we take the issues that come up seriously.

I HAVE USED BARNES BULLETS EXTENSIVELY FROM THEIR BEGINNING. MY FIRST AFRICAN GAME WAS TAKEN WITH THE FIRST GENERATION BARNES X-BULLET .375/300GR THAT SHOT 0.75 MOA FOR 3 SHOTS AT 2529 FPS (5-YARD CHRONO VELOCITY, 100-YARD TARGET) FROM MY FEATHERWEIGHT PRE-64 M70 .375 H&H.
THAT WAS IN 2001, ABOUT THE SAME TIME AS THE BARNES INDUSTRIAL SPY VISITED GSC IN RSA AND BOUGHT UP A HUGE VARIETY AND QUANTITY OF GSC BULLETS. THE TSX WAS A LOW-TECH "COSMETIC" (... AS YOU LIKE TO SAY ... YOU LIKE COSMETICS, EH? ...) MIMIC OF THE GSC HV.
BARNES X OR XFB, XFB-CANNELURED, XLC, TSX, TTSX ... ALL HAVE BEEN EXCELLENT PERFORMERS, ALBEIT THREE-SHOT GROUPS TWICE THE SIZE OF GSC HV BULLETS.
I WAS VERY SATISFIED, HAPPY WITH BARNES QUALITY UNTIL RUSTY SHOWED ME THE DEFORMED BULLETS.
IT'S STILL YOUR INDUSTRIAL SECRET AS TO HOW/WHY IT HAPPENED?
AND YOU SAY THAT THEY ARE GOOD AS ANY BULLET COULD BE WANTED TO BE? YOU SAY THE DEFORMED BULLETS SHOOT GOOD?
THUS NO GOOD ASSURANCE IT WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN, BUT LEMUEL AND RUFUS LIKE TO PLAY WITH COSMETICS TOO? SO YOU SAY IN THE SENTENCE BELOW:


The Plant Manager personally has looked into these bullets, and is/has addressed the problem, "Rufus, and Lemuel" have both been actively involved in correcting the cosmetic issues. Barnes is more than willing to work with our customers on concerns they have, and we want to hear about the problems so we can get them fixed. We are NOT "corporate" animal and we will work to get issues solved, but one of the best ways to get the problem solved is to get to the root of the problem and for that we need the most accurate information we can get, a generic they "don't shoot good" or they go clakity clack is not all the information we need. I know that may be all the information a customer has, so please contact us so we can help.


CONSIDER YOURSELF CONTACTED. NOW CONTACT THIS: moon
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 16Bore:
So after shooting the "duds" Rusty shot groups with the ones that didn't clank on the coffee table and everything was kosher?


THis ringless set still appears needing to be clarified by RIP.

As for the ring-bottom, it would appear that RIP's and Barnes target bullets may not be from the same batch. Or did a group of 'foulers'/rejects accidentally get put in a box for shipping?


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Rusty and I have both shot many good Barnes bullets with good accuracy.
Rusty got two boxes of duds and accuracy went to hell for him.
No good bullets in .411/300gr TSX have been tried by him since.

Perhaps if Barnes would send him two boxes of "non-duds" (instead of money) he could try again.

Can Barmes still make a "non-dud" bullet???
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If they were "so deformed", Rusty shoulda paid more attention at the press. The accuracy and duds claim doesn't mean shit until the original results are duplicated.

But now that they are all shot up, the world may never know....
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 16Bore:
If they were "so deformed", Rusty shoulda paid more attention at the press. The accuracy and duds claim doesn't mean shit until the original results are duplicated.

BY AN INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY WITH NO DOG IN THE FIGHT.

But now that they are all shot up, the world may never know....


How many more "dud" boxes of bullets are there out there?

After regular use of a good product, do you scrutinize every bullet when you open a new box to continue in your time-constrained reloading as life passes you by?
There is way too little time in life to do anal inspections of every bullet as it comes out of the box.

How many more "dud" boxes of bullets are there out there?

Many makers sell there duds as "blems" at reduced price, unloading them through vendors.

These can be merely cosmetic blemishes or real stinkers euphemistically called "blems." Barnes has home-cooked up a nice omelet of rotten eggs here!

Barnes just dumps them in with the rest of the goods at full price and then tests any obviously defective bullets returned, and says they are OK, no refund, no replacement?
Just blems at full price and what a stinking hassle? I think it is far worse than that.
Something stinks alright.
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Mike_Dettorre
posted Hide Post
Generally, I find conjecture, speculation, and assumptions, and pointless provocative comments stink.

They can be driven by ulterior motives.


Mike

Legistine actu quod scripsi?

Never under estimate the internet community's ability to reply to your post with their personal rant about their tangentially related, single occurrence issue.




What I have learned on AR, since 2001:
1. The proper answer to: Where is the best place in town to get a steak dinner? is…You should go to Mel's Diner and get the fried chicken.
2. Big game animals can tell the difference between .015 of an inch in diameter, 15 grains of bullet weight, and 150 fps.
3. There is a difference in the performance of two identical projectiles launched at the same velocity if they came from different cartridges.
4. While a double rifle is the perfect DGR, every 375HH bolt gun needs to be modified to carry at least 5 down.
5. While a floor plate and detachable box magazine both use a mechanical latch, only the floor plate latch is reliable. Disregard the fact that every modern military rifle uses a detachable box magazine.
6. The Remington 700 is unreliable regardless of the fact it is the basis of the USMC M40 sniper rifle for 40+ years with no changes to the receiver or extractor and is the choice of more military and law enforcement sniper units than any other rifle.
7. PF actions are not suitable for a DGR and it is irrelevant that the M1, M14, M16, & AK47 which were designed for hunting men that can shoot back are all PF actions.
8. 95 deg F in Africa is different than 95 deg F in TX or CA and that is why you must worry about ammunition temperature in Africa (even though most safaris take place in winter) but not in TX or in CA.
9. The size of a ding in a gun's finish doesn't matter, what matters is whether it’s a safe ding or not.
10. 1 in a row is a trend, 2 in a row is statistically significant, and 3 in a row is an irrefutable fact.
11. Never buy a WSM or RCM cartridge for a safari rifle or your go to rifle in the USA because if they lose your ammo you can't find replacement ammo but don't worry 280 Rem, 338-06, 35 Whelen, and all Weatherby cartridges abound in Africa and back country stores.
12. A well hit animal can run 75 yds. in the open and suddenly drop with no initial blood trail, but the one I shot from 200 yds. away that ran 10 yds. and disappeared into a thicket and was not found was lost because the bullet penciled thru. I am 100% certain of this even though I have no physical evidence.
13. A 300 Win Mag is a 500 yard elk cartridge but a 308 Win is not a 300 yard elk cartridge even though the same bullet is travelling at the same velocity at those respective distances.
 
Posts: 10181 | Location: Loving retirement in Boise, ID | Registered: 16 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:

After regular use of a good product, do you scrutinize every bullet when you open a new box to continue in your time-constrained reloading as life passes you by?
There is way too little time in life to do anal inspections of every bullet as it comes out of the box.


You said it was sooooo obvious, but didnt recognize it until some bad shooting. So if something so glaringly obvious as the "out of round" was missed during some time constrained reloading session, what else was missed? With so little time in life to reload and pay attention, maybe its time to rethink the whole shebang.

Barnes took the time to evaluate your "problem", but you weren't happy. Now you want a refund and compensation because your time is so valuable. What else should they do? Fly out to your place, load on your press with your powder, primers, and brass? Then shoot your gun at your range in your conditions?

Maybe its a conspiracy.....
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of graybird
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike_Dettorre:
Generally, I find conjecture, speculation, and assumptions, and pointless provocative comments stink.

They can be driven by ulterior motives.


I believe this to be right on target!


Graybird

"Make no mistake, it's not revenge he's after ... it's the reckoning."
 
Posts: 3722 | Location: Okie in Falcon, CO | Registered: 01 July 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY: Barnes Bullets

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia