416sw,

I noticed that too. Heck there isn't even a bolt on that one picture!

Scott

George S
Unless AHR has given their persimission for use of their pictures (copyright violation) AND for the excessive bandwidth being consumed by Hotlinked pictures (theft of assets) as they are paying FOR EVERY BIT OF BANDWDITH, I would ask that these links and/or messages be deleted.

Jeff

The bolt angles look different to me.

There is that term again.

I would just like to add: WHERE was the INDIGNATION about bandwidth from the majority of this forum when it was invaded by those buttmuches from what was it, AR15? Where?

I see, suddenly all the inconsistencies were "redone." I recall the initial confusion Scott had about these rifles when he first claimed they were his. Like he didn't have a clue what they were chambered for or what sort of action they were on.

This latest BS sounds like last month when his "Judy" identity was caught in a flock of lies and stupid remarks and the grand excuse was "someone stole my password" and has been posting as me.

Scott Sweet is a pathological liar.

Jeff,

If you are the owner of the website that is linked, we will ask Scott not to link to it, if he continues to do so, we will remove the link.

Still, if we all followed this sort of policy, at least half the webs content will disappear.

Likewise, if all the photos and videos that are not just linked, but actually found on other website, which are originally ours, and we get paid for them, I would be able to go to Africa at least twice a year.

The thing you might bear in mind is that this is a forum. The photos are linked to a post under discussion.

If the photos are actually placed on a permanent web page, that might be different.

Post deleted by Judy

What exactly is a "buttmunche"? It would seem that I am missing that term in my limited vocabulary.

Joe

Jeff,

We cannot stop anyone from linking photos from other websites.

In fact, sites that do not wish to have their photos linked, put some block on their site so one cannot link it.

Saeed,
the only way to effectively block photos of http is to move and rename them. One can not block, reasonably, requests over port 80 that are crafted to resemble a browser request from a legitimite user.

a common practice is to have a rotation program, that puts "ugly" pics in place of that named resource on a server, and uploads the correct pic, with a new name.

Hotlinks ARE theft of resources, when used more than causally, and someone claiming this work as their own or their property is a violation of copyright laws, if they do not own the rights to that image.

So, we have a person that routinely steals bandwidth, causes administrative dollars to be spent, falsifies a company's web utilization report and violates copyright images without proper notice.

this is outside the "fair use" aspect of copyright.

When the troll is a dangerous liar, that's one thing, when it's breaking laws, that's entirely a different thing. Since it is self admittedly prone to stealing other peoples work, as the content of ALL websites is the PROPERTY of the owner of that website, I feel that AR should react.

Perhaps a 2 week banning of it's ISP, and a removal of all it's posts

jeffe