One of Us
| Fergus,
I use the leupold 2.5x compact on my .458 lott and .585 with no drama's....check that you have enough lop in your stock and also I assume your not a stock crawler ??
Regards PC. |
| |
Moderator
| Fergus,
I have a Burris 2.5x on my .470 Capstick, and it provides plenty of eye relief for me. There is also the Burris 1.5x and Leupold 2.5x, which should fit the bill.
George |
| |
one of us
| Well Bwana If you do not mind going the extra streach then get the Nickel Magnum 1.5-6x30 it has a 12,5 cm (4.9 in.) eye relief! and the quality of the Zeiss It is furthermore made for the Mauser actions and Safari rifles. This is it http://www.gerhardt-optik.de/en/products/scopes/m15660.htmlCheers, Andr� |
| Posts: 2293 | Location: The Kingdom of Denmark | Registered: 13 January 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
The difference is magnification, light transmission, and for many, better target acquisition (superimposing the cross-hairs over the target rather than obscuring the target).
George, that is exactly my reason. I have tried a "ghost ring" peep, but still dont find it as quick or as useful as a scope. I took my 450 Ack to Zambia with irons and when I came across a buff in long grass (60 yards away), I had to ask the guide which end as the head so I knew where to place the shot. I dont think I would have needed to ask that if I was looking through a scope. Also, I just do not find sight picture acquisition on game with any iron sight to be as intuitive as a scope.
Fergus |
| Posts: 266 | Location: Australia | Registered: 14 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Guys
Thanks for all the suggestions. I will try to get a look at the fixed Leupolds and Burris. Not all of these are available here, but I will see what I can find.
Fergus |
| Posts: 266 | Location: Australia | Registered: 14 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I have two of the Leupold scopes Fjold mentions on hard kickers and haven't been bit yet. I also have a similar VX 1 which seems to be just as good for less money. |
| Posts: 3174 | Location: Warren, PA | Registered: 08 August 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Fergus,
As PC said check your LOP and gun mount. I have Leupold 1.5-5s on a 416 Rigby and 458 Lott and am fine even with field postions and prone (with the Rigby, haven't tried prone with the Lott...yet). Hope you find the answer as scope bite with the big stuff is surely not a good time.
John |
| Posts: 831 | Location: Mount Vernon, WA | Registered: 18 November 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Yikes! That Nickel scope costs three times what I paid for my 416 Rigby rifle! |
| Posts: 7158 | Location: Snake River | Registered: 02 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| You guys will laugh, but I found and use old Weaver 2.5X scopes with a post reticle on my boomers. Super long eye relief, so I don't get it again, again, and again, like has happened through out my shooting life. I've only got about 400-500 rounds thru my .458 Winchester Magnum and my .416 Rigby and they both have held up. |
| |
new member
| These 2.5X Compact Leupolds that you guys are using, they are the Shotgun scopes I see in the catalog? |
| |
one of us
| It is the M8 2.5x20 Compact. For everyone that ends up on a Rigby, another 500 are sold to shotgun hunters back east, so they market it as a shotgun scope. JCN |
| Posts: 7158 | Location: Snake River | Registered: 02 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I still like the Leupold 3X for a DGR...and the 1x4 varible....The 2.5X compact is the strongest scope on todays market and can take the recoil, thats its advantage...
With such big bores as the Lott and Ackley and up, I still like iron sights, either shallow V or Ghost ring peep...Mostly I hunt in Tanzania and in high grass where shots are within 75 yards for the most part with an ocassional long shot tossed in to keep me on my toes, but a Buffalo is a heck of a big target with about 2.5 feet or better of kill zone, I think anyone should be able to plant one in a target of that size at about any reasonalbe range......
I like a scope on my 416 Rem and 404s and smaller, usually a 3X or a 1.5x5 or 1x4... |
| Posts: 42321 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
You guys will laugh, but I found and use old Weaver 2.5X scopes with a post reticle on my boomers.
Really? I just had one mounted on my kids' .22. Maybe I should reconsider that...
Frans |
| Posts: 1717 | Location: Alberta, Canada | Registered: 17 March 2003 |
IP
|
|