THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Ruger #1 nitro express custom rifles

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ruger #1 nitro express custom rifles Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I am interested in possibly building a Ruger #1 in one of the nitro express calibers (470, 500, or 577), and was wondering if anyone has experience with one. I know SSK has built several.
 
Posts: 2852 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 02 September 2001Reply With Quote
<FFg>
posted
I'm considering this as well. Check out Bowen at: http://www.bowenclassicarms.com/
 
Reply With Quote
<PWN>
posted
Ken,

I shot one that had been a 30.06 converted to 500 NE 3 inch during my hunt in Mozambique last July. That rifle belongs to 500nitro who is a member of this forum. He is from Natal RSA and I am certain he would gladly answer any questions you might have about this conversion. It was a pleasure to carry at about 7.5 pounds, but the recoil, while not painful, is certainly robust.

Perry

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
500 Nitro

I have some questions about your 500 NE as well.

What brand barrel was used? How about the length and contour?

What kind of accuracy do you get? What kind of ammo or handloads are you shooting? How about performance on game?

Who was your gunsmith, from RSA or USA?

Did you fit a muzzle brake or mercury tube? Or special recoil pad?

As you can tell I'm very interested in this conversion.

 
Posts: 1551 | Location: North Texas | Registered: 11 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
After a little more research into this, I think the 500 NE 3" is the way to go on this for me. I think the 577 and 600 JDJ (500 NE blown out to 600) would be just to brutal in the #1. Also, cost of dies, bullets, and brass go up considerably in anything over 500 NE, and I already have access to 500 NE dies. I sent an Email to SSK and should have a reply early next week as to pricing, etc. They say on the website that the original barrel contour should be used, and they suggest starting off with a 458 #1H. Ruger is going to be producing the 1H 458 in stainless this year as well, but I think if I do this project, I will stick with blued and walnut stock. I will say that Ruger often stocks the #1's with very nice wood.
My purpose in this is to get a nitro express without parting with the $10,000 for a double rifle.
 
Posts: 2852 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 02 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Mainly out of curiousity, has anyone tried the oldest NE, the .450 3 1/4 in a Ruger #1? Could it be made from a 458 WM Tropical? I like that sloping cartridge
 
Posts: 544 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 27 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hadn't studied the link to BCA before posting the question above. Got my answer there; it can be done and not too expensive either.
 
Posts: 544 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 27 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I just got an answer back from SSK. They said $1300-$2200 depending on what barrel, options, etc. They do not do reboring, only rebarreling. I am thinking that it may be best to use Bowen, and have them rebore a 458 to keep the factory barrel, sights, scope mounts, etc. I assume the 416's in the #1 have the same barrel contour as the 458. I would try to avoid using a muzzle break if possible, because I think that would take away from the look of the rifle. I would use a decelerator pad and a mercury reducer in the butt.

[This message has been edited by Ken Cline (edited 02-03-2002).]

 
Posts: 2852 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 02 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 500nitro
posted Hide Post
As PWN mentioned, my rifle started out as a 30-06.
I used a 1 in 15" twist custom barrel slimmed right down and cut to 24". The barrel was one of a batch made in Germany many years ago for a local Johannesburg gunsmith by the name of Bundock. Bunny has since passed on the the big workshop in the sky. I do not know who the maker was.
I specifically did not want the chunk of steel most people refer to as a barrel on heavy calibre rifles.
I can send the contour sizes and picture if you want. It is about as slim as one of the barrels on a 500 double, slightly less.

I use Bell and Bertram brass with federal primers and GS custom 540 gr flat nose solids.
The weight was arrived at by experimenting with the original 570gr bullets Gerry made to order for me. I was getting a tad more recoil than I wanted and could not get the bullets to group satisfactorily.
I turned them down on my lathe until I found the optimim length/weight for my barrel and GS then proceeded to make up a batch for me and keep the programme on file for further orders.

I shoot average velocity around 2180-2200fps and group in 2" @ 50m (55yds) with Express sights (3 shot groups)

Since we are limited by powder choice in SA, I battled with what was available. I had problems with pressure with S341 and the next powder up was S365 which gave irregular velocities and left a sooty appearance in the cases and barrel.
I finally settled on a duplex 3.5 grains of Red Dot followed by 107gr of S365 and the bullet seated snug onto the powder.

This load has been used on several buffalo and 2 elephant. Penetration is more than sufficient and creates an impressive wound channel and has yet not to go clean through.
PWN used it for an insurance shot on his buff last year in Mozambique.
From behind at about 15 paces he shot at the heart . The bullet went in just above and 6" forward of the tail and exited the chest. The buffalo looked as if someone had given it a healthy kick in the butt!

I had a pretty pice of wood on the rifle ex factory which I stripped, finished to the action and gave an old english oil finish, I filled the action screw hole up with #9 lead shot held in place with a high density foam and finished off with a de'celerator recoil pad.
The forend had the front lopped off and replaced with a piece of buffalo horm and finished like the butt.
The regular safety catch tore chunks out of my thumb in the original configuration, so it was cut down into a small oval with a fine chequering - problem solved.
I had a 3/4 rib fitted with custom single robust blade express sights and a corresponding front sight which is quick interchangeable should I ever change loads.
It has an integral front barrel band.
Gunsmiths were John Hall and Chris Neubauer of Durban.
I did all of the stockwork and Tinus Els (Jhb) did the engraving.
Steelwork including the barrel price and satin blueing worked out at around US$1000, and engraving(not excessive) was $120.
The rifle handles like a pedigree shotgun, points beautifully. Recoil off a bench is attention getting, but in the field I have yet to notice it.
It weighs 7lb 9 oz.

 
Posts: 1069 | Location: Durban,KZN, South Africa | Registered: 16 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JudgeG
posted Hide Post
I have a Ruger #1 in .450 N.E. 3 1/4". As I understand it, you would have some problems with the extractor and the fact that the .458 has a belt on it (if that is the original caliber) if you tried to use the original barrel it a tropical model. I used a .45/70 that had already been reamed out to .45/100. We had to set back the barrel a bit because the N.E. had a thinner rim than the .45/70. A pain, but no big deal.

It makes a relatively lightweight rifle, but mine's Magna-ported and the kick doesn't seem so bad. The long, low pressure round just shoves you half a step back. I can shoot it with a second and third round in between my left hand fingers, and get off all three rounds as fast and I can work a bolt. I get 2140 fps with 450 grain solids in the 22 inch barrel and no sticking of brass in 100 degree weather.

If anyone wants to rent a reamer... let me know.

[This message has been edited by judgeg (edited 02-04-2002).]

 
Posts: 7750 | Location: GA | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ken,

I think if I was doing one I would look at the 470 Nitro and for a couple of reasons.

Firstly, you have good brass available.

Secondly, if you wanted to load it up to full potential, the 470 has about the same base diameter as the 416 Rigby and Ruger does chamber that round in the Number 1. The 500 Nitro is also about the same diameter but brass might be questionable with that caliber.

Thirdly, you would have various bullets made for the 480 pistol, which I think are the right diamter for the 470.

Mike


 
Posts: 7206 | Location: Sydney, Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
I am having a Ruger No. 1 Tropical in .458 WM reamed to .450 NE as we speak. Everything I can find in the way of measurements -- including measuring actual brass -- as well as personal advice from Ross Seyfried suggests that reamer should clean up the .458 belt perfectly. We shall see.
 
Posts: 16669 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
mike,

I have shot the speer and hornday .475 pistol bullets in my 470 capstick. The speers feed but the hornadys do not. Thy shoot about 2" at 100 yards. I have not used them on game.

 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Re Bill/Oregon: I have come to the same conclusion, ie. the 450 NE should clean up a .458 chamber. Are you using the 3" or 3.25" chamber? Let us know how yours turns out. Also who is doing the work and what is he charging? Can the extractor be modified so that it does not have to slip over the rim upon chambering. This would give more positive extraction, although it should hardly be needed.
C.G.B.
 
Posts: 238 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 05 June 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JudgeG
posted Hide Post
For you .458 to .450 N.E. guys:

I hope it (the reaming out of the belt) works for you. Since I only had an original .45/70, the belt question was only speculative when I asked my gunsmith. He may have been shooting from the hip when he answered and didn't refer to schematics of the respective cartridges. I feel sure that your smiths did their homework and are right. In any event when your project(s) are finished, I will be interested in sharing loads with you folks and pricing on reloading dies, etc. too. Right now I'm having someone load for me and I can't afford to shoot the gun as much as I'd like.

 
Posts: 7750 | Location: GA | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Gentlemen, perhaps I�m stating the obvious (I�m good at that ), but it seems that there is no need to reinforce the buttstock at all on the Ruger #1 when converted to some monster thumper caliber? At least no one mentions it, when it is a constant warning when converting a bolt action to something over .40 caliber.
 
Posts: 1027 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
CBG: I am using the .450 BPE/NE 3.25 case. The smith here in Medford, Oregon, who is doing the job for me is Kevin Wyatt at http://www.wyattsoutdoor.com/. I am expecting the job to come in just over $200, including reamer rental and installation of a Decellerator pad, although it could be a bit more.
I really lucked out on dies, finding a circa-1957 RCBS set in excellent shape at a small gun shop for about $50.
 
Posts: 16669 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jim in Idaho:
Gentlemen, perhaps I�m stating the obvious (I�m good at that ), but it seems that there is no need to reinforce the buttstock at all on the Ruger #1 when converted to some monster thumper caliber? At least no one mentions it, when it is a constant warning when converting a bolt action to something over .40 caliber.

J.D. at SSK discussed this aspect with me a couple of years ago. It is one of his real concerns regarding the #1. He prefers to install a Counter Coil in the stock to relieve the jolt.

The Counter Coil may be effective towards this, however, it is about as ugly as one can imagine!

I think the #1 will deal with cartridges at the .500 NE level but above that I would be hesitant.

~Holmes

 
Posts: 1171 | Location: Wyoming, USA | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I talked to Hamilton Bowen today, and I may very well now be going with the 470 NE. The current production Ruger #1's (everything after the 300 prefix serial number) have the quarter rib holes in the barrel drilled to deep to accept boring out to 500 NE. So, the only way to get a 500 is by rebarreling. That would mean at least an additional $700. The current production #1's can be rebored out to 470 (as Ross Seyfried had done), and accuracy has proven to be excellent. Bowen said they do 10-12 470's per year, and only 1 or 2 500's.
He said the 300 prefix serial number 458's are very hard to find, but it could be bored out if I find one.
So, I think when I do this, I will buy a new 458 and send it to Bowen. I will also consider the recessed safety button (although it is $495, ouch!). I certainly will have a mercury tube installed and a Decelerator pad. Color case hardened receiver is also an option.
The recoil might not be quite as brutal out of this as the 500, although Ross loaded it up to 2350 fps with a 500 grain bullet in his, pretty impressive!
I don't think an animal is going to notice much difference between the 470 and the 500 if hit in the right place.
 
Posts: 2852 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 02 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
500 Nitro

Thanks for so much good information. If not too much trouble I would certainly like to see a picture of your 500 NE.

Everyone else, thank you for sharing a wealth of information on big bore single shot DG rifles. Most intriging. I'm going to print this and file it in my gunsmith data book.

 
Posts: 1551 | Location: North Texas | Registered: 11 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Just picked up the .450 NE 3.25 from the gunsmith today. All it took to convert the Ruger No. 1 Tropical from .458 WinMag was the reamer, a lovely Pacific Precision Grinding reamer rented from http://www.reamerrentals.com/.
The reamer cleans up a .458 chamber perfectly.
Now to shoot the rascal!
 
Posts: 16669 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Jim/Idaho: My .458 has developed a crack in the pistol grip and I expect I will have to replace the stock. I have heard that #1's converted to .500NE will shed their forends unless the attachment is beefed up. Right now I am looking for a semi-inletted set that has a larger dia. pistol grip, cheek piece, larger forend, etc.
Bill/Oregon: let us know how it shoots!
 
Posts: 238 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 05 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i have a ruger 1 in 577 nitro and a ruger 1 in 600 made by ssk industries they are great rifles and i use them every year to hunt moose bear and i have gone to africa befor and used them on al kinds of african game

------------------
black powder rules

 
Posts: 2095 | Location: B.C | Registered: 31 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I set the process in motion today. I ordered the 458 through a gun shop, and again called Bowen regarding a few more questions. I should have the rifle (in 458 factory form) by this weekend, so I will ship it off to Bowen early next week. The only bad thing I found out so far is the possible long wait for the reboring. Hamilton could not commit to an exact time, because he said we are at Labounty's mercy. Anyhow, it could be as short as 2 months to as long as 12 months. They are hoping at least by 6 months. So, I decided to get it there ASAP and get started. I for sure am going to change the pad and add a mercury tube in the stock, but I am not sure about the recessed safety button yet. I guess the ejection does not work well at all with the standard button and these long cartridges.
I found a good deal on Norma brass through Midway, and ordered that along with Barnes bullets (solids and XLC's). Dies were the killer. $225 for the 3-die set and Huntington was the only one who stocks them. I just had to bite the bullet (pun intended) and get the necessary supplies ordered.
I will post again in hopefully not too long when I get the gun back and to the range.
I ran some numbers for recoil based on a 9.5# rifle.
458 win mag- 63.5# recoil 20.7 fps recoil velocity
470 NE- 82.1# recoil 23.6 recoil velocity
470 NE (Seyfried loads- 500 grain @ 2350)- 98.2# recoil 25.8 recoil velocity
500 NE- 97.6# recoil 25.7 recoil velocity

With the standard 470 loads, this shouldn't be that bad to shoot, but it could get brutal with the Seyfried loads, we'll see.

 
Posts: 2852 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 02 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
doesn't Pac-Nor rebarrel Number 1's??

Mike

------------------
Victory through superior firepower!

 
Posts: 324 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ready_on_the_right:
doesn't Pac-Nor rebarrel Number 1's??

Mike



Just found this on their site.

"PAC-NOR does barrel Ruger models 1 and 3 but does not rebarrel other lever actions, slide actions, or semi-automatic rifles."

 
Posts: 324 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fla3006
posted Hide Post
Would somebody share some loading data for the 450NE in a Ruger? What is a good load to get 500 grains @ 2250FPS out of a 24-25" barrel? How fast can you go in the Ruger with this round? Is there any reason to consider a 450 #2 versus the 450 3.25"? Thanks.
 
Posts: 9487 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 11 January 2002Reply With Quote
<Pfeifer>
posted
Ken Cline,
I have had my sights on an older Ruger#1 in .458 WM for a while now with conversion to a 470 NE in mind as I have a set of RCBS dies already. From your information, it appears that this gun is also a candidate for a .500 NE conversion as it's SN is 132-6xxxx. Is this correct?

From your posts - Is it the "pre 300 prefix SN" guns that are good for reboring to 500 NE? It sounds like it, but just wanted to be clear on this. Hate to belabor this.... Thanks Jeff P

 
Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Paul H
posted Hide Post
Ken,

Did you consider CH4D for dies? http://www.ch4d.com/ch4d/Catalog/Page21b.htm
$120 for 470 NE. Everyone I know who has used CH4D has been happy with the dies.

 
Posts: 7213 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Bill from Oregon,

I'm very interested in hearing from you regarding your thoughts about your new rifle. Was looking at a nice used Ruger #1 the other day but it was in 416 Rigby, had it been in 458 WM I would have closed the deal on the spot!

[This message has been edited by Wachtel (edited 02-08-2002).]

 
Posts: 544 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 27 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i have a ruger 1 458 wing mag for sale if any 1 is interested.its in excellent condition and hasnt been used to much.

------------------
black powder rules

 
Posts: 2095 | Location: B.C | Registered: 31 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i have a ruger 1 458 wing mag for sale if any 1 is interested.its in excellent condition and hasnt been used to much.

steveferg@sympatico.ca

------------------
black powder rules

 
Posts: 2095 | Location: B.C | Registered: 31 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Jeff-
From what Hamilton Bowen told me, the rifle must have a prefix of 300 in the serial number (not 301, 302, etc.). Apparently, these were made in the 60's and are not easy to find. Since the 300 prefix, Ruger has gotten into the habit of drilling the screw holes deeper that attach the quarter rib on. This is not a problem if the barrel is left at 458 or rebored for 470, but the holes are too deep to allow reboring for 500 NE. He said it is very rare to find a non 300 prefix 458 that will accept boring to 500, so chances are they will not. He said that a few times, the screw holes were so deep that the gun could not be bored to 470, but that also is rare, because you are not really taking out that much metal going from .458" to .474".
I originally wanted a 500, but now that I researched and thought about it, I actually prefer the 470. Bullet selection is better (including lighter bullets for this caliber), and recoil in the #1 should be not as severe in 470.
 
Posts: 2852 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 02 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Wachtel: As soon as I get a chance to work up some loads and shoot the .450 NE, I will post. I have been much businer than I care to since the rifle came home.
I had a No. 1 in .416 Rigby, and had a wonderful time with it, especially shooting the oncredibly accurate cast RCBS gas-check bullet over 54 grains of XMP-5744 at about 2,000 fps. Now that's big-bore plinking!
 
Posts: 16669 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
<Pfeifer>
posted
I couldn't resist...Caution very high drool factor for us here on this thread!

A Ruger #1 colorcased w/ gold inlays in (drum roll please)...500 NE

http://www.h-baelder.de/foto903.html
http://www.h-baelder.de/foto1003.html
http://www.h-baelder.de/foto1002.html
http://www.h-baelder.de/foto1001.html

Regards, Jeff P

PS: Thanks to whoever it was that showed us Herr Baelder's website! Ken is this what started this whole thing?

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
WOW!!!!! Now that is spectacular workmanship. I assume this work was done in Germany. They have some very excellent craftsmen over there. Only bad part I can imagine on that one is the final price. I would guess that is near what a double would cost, once he got done.
What interested me in the Ruger conversions is a quality nitro express caliber rifle at a price well below what a double would be. I briefly checked out doubles, and if I were to get one I would get a Krieghoff, which would mean $10,000 for the basic model.
I was not really interested in paying that kind of money, and then having all the barrel regulation, etc. that must be done with a double to get it too shoot right.
With the Ruger conversion, I can keep the factory sights and scope mounts and use either. Another advantage is the #1 action will take pressures that double rifles never could take.
I did decide that a safety change (recessed safety) is almost a must with the #1 conversions or that long brass case will never eject.
 
Posts: 2852 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 02 September 2001Reply With Quote
<Harald>
posted
I won't be able to sleep tonight. I don't think I have ever seen anything more gorgeous.
 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Ruger #1 nitro express custom rifles

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia