THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    416 Rigby CZ 550 & Warne QD mounts

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
416 Rigby CZ 550 & Warne QD mounts Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted
How firm should the wing levers be tightened for these mounts?

On my Kevlar stocked rifle I have 30 mm Warne QD rings & my Leupold 1.5-6 X illuminated reticle scope. I find that after 20 to 40 shots the levers seem to have moved a bit and I am able to tighten them again.

So far the mounts have not come loose as I check them before each range session.

Is there anything particular that I need to be aware of? I leave for my first African / Zimbabwe hunt for buffalo in 47 days.


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11420 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Warne CZ rings only allow you to use them with levers on the right side.

Set your levers like this and they will tighten themselves with recoil:



Those are low Warne 1" CZ rings that they don't make anymore. They only work with a small ocular bell like on the 2.5X Leupold.

Your higher 30mm rings will be stressed more by your heavier scope.

Still, you should only finger tighten the levers just short of "white knuckle."

If you set the levers properly, pointing up on the right side of the rifle, they will stay tight, or get even tighter.

If you were using standard CZ rings, you could torque the main mounting screws to 65 inch-pounds: Nothing is stronger that CZ standard rings.
They can also be QD with a hex key/Allen wrench in your pocket,
and the slotted head main mounting screws replaced by socket head screws.
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
Thanks RIP

I was actually wondering if I should PM you or just post on forum!

Here is my rifle & scope


I did not realise that the mounts would tighten with recoil. I thought I noticed a bit of movement when I checked last.

I do have the Warne torque wrench but that is set for 25 inch-pound.


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11420 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of eagle27
posted Hide Post
Nakihunter, it maybe the photo angle, but the rear ring looks as though it is to far forward on the integral dovetail for the recoil lug on the ring to engage in the slot?
 
Posts: 3944 | Location: Rolleston, Christchurch, New Zealand | Registered: 03 August 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
egle27,
Must be an artifact of the photo, there is only one position where the rear ring may be placed.

Nakihunter:
You have positioned your levers so that inertia of the lever works to loosen it when the rifle recoils.

That is the opposite of how they should be on the right side of the rifle.
The direction your levers are pointing would be correct for levers on the left side of the rifle.

If you will point the tips of the levers upward, any direction above bore axis, the inertia of the levers will work to keep them tight in recoil.

If the levers tighten in a clockwise direction:
Starboard levers must point up.
Port levers must point down.

The opposite would be true for a lever that tightened in a counter-clockwise direction.
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Must be an artifact of the photo, there is only one position where the rear ring may be placed.



I'd like to see the rifle from the opposite side. That rear ring doesn't look right.
 
Posts: 1928 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 30 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
RIP my friend - you are not only a good doctor but a budding Physicist! Big Grin Thanks for the simple & accurate explanation sir. This sociologist has to brush up his high school physics!

Eagle - the rear mount is fitted correctly as there is a side tab that HAS TO fit into a dedicated recess in the bridge of the action. It cannot fit any other way - that is the fool proof design. So it is an optical illusion from lighting in the photo.



"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11420 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I wanted the view from the opposite side, because I've seen two front rings used. It must be some weird lighting trick in the picture because it looks like the rear ring overhangs the port. Neither of mine do, with the same Warne Rings.
 
Posts: 1928 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 30 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of eagle27
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nakihunter:
RIP my friend - you are not only a good doctor but a budding Physicist! Big Grin Thanks for the simple & accurate explanation sir. This sociologist has to brush up his high school physics!

Eagle - the rear mount is fitted correctly as there is a side tab that HAS TO fit into a dedicated recess in the bridge of the action. It cannot fit any other way - that is the fool proof design. So it is an optical illusion from lighting in the photo.



Thanks Naki, I thought as much, I have CZ rings (not levers) on my Brno ZKK 600 so know the set up for them. Just had a horrible thought you may have had to grind away some of the side tab to get the ring spacing for your scope to keep that front ring away from the deep set lense in the Leupold.

Different scope in the picture accompanying this post, is it yours or just a file photo? It has the front ring wrapped around the front lense area!
 
Posts: 3944 | Location: Rolleston, Christchurch, New Zealand | Registered: 03 August 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Kenati
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
egle27,


If the levers tighten in a clockwise direction:
Starboard levers must point up.
Port levers must point down.

The opposite would be true for a lever that tightened in a counter-clockwise direction.


In your example photo above does your front ring tighten in a counterclockwise direction?

If not, it seems both levers should be pointing up. I learned of this myself the hard way a few years ago on some Leupold quick release rings.
 
Posts: 1051 | Location: Dirty Coast | Registered: 23 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
Eagle - Yes it my scope & that is the first one which got spots on it (coating bubbled?) & I had to send back to Leupold. When I first wrote to them with that photo they said it was fine. I attached the photo with the repair unit & they replied that the rings should NOT be around the lens! Their instruction on the web do not mention this.

I had a similar issue with another scope on my Mannlicher Schoenauer as that also has a longer bridge space.

quote:
Originally posted by eagle27:
quote:
Originally posted by Nakihunter:
RIP my friend - you are not only a good doctor but a budding Physicist! Big Grin Thanks for the simple & accurate explanation sir. This sociologist has to brush up his high school physics!

Eagle - the rear mount is fitted correctly as there is a side tab that HAS TO fit into a dedicated recess in the bridge of the action. It cannot fit any other way - that is the fool proof design. So it is an optical illusion from lighting in the photo.



Thanks Naki, I thought as much, I have CZ rings (not levers) on my Brno ZKK 600 so know the set up for them. Just had a horrible thought you may have had to grind away some of the side tab to get the ring spacing for your scope to keep that front ring away from the deep set lense in the Leupold.

Different scope in the picture accompanying this post, is it yours or just a file photo? It has the front ring wrapped around the front lense area!


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11420 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    416 Rigby CZ 550 & Warne QD mounts

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia