THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Researching .375 H&H rifles.

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Researching .375 H&H rifles. Login/Join
 
new member
posted
Hello, I've decided to purchase a new rifle in 375 H&H and when researching the makers I saw some differences that I'm hoping I can get some explanation on.

The first thing is barrel length. Ruger M77 offers it's rifle with a 23" barrel, while Browning offers it's A-bolt with a 26". Can anyone tell me why the diffence, and what is preferred?

Second, I want the synthetic stock, but should I special order a blue barrel, or just go with the standard SS? I currently shoot a M77 30.06 stainless. I like the rifle and have taken a few elk with it, but I always feel a bit funny when I head up into the hills with a silver and black rifle...know what I mean?

Thanks,
Chuck.

[ 04-11-2003, 21:03: Message edited by: Chuck M. ]
 
Posts: 23 | Location: Newbury Park, CA | Registered: 17 January 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
you missed the cz550... which is the best bang for the buck there is
jeffe
 
Posts: 40240 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Not real fond of the styling, and have read some discouraging remarks regarding the 550 action, and the duribility of the wood stock.

I was mainly just using the Browning and Ruger as examples in barrel length - which I'm still trying to figure out.
 
Posts: 23 | Location: Newbury Park, CA | Registered: 17 January 2003Reply With Quote
<500 Nitro>
posted
Chcuk,

With Jeffoso on this one - Best buy, Good solid working rifle, generally
very accurate (or at least mine all are).
I would also suggest the (Brno) CZ550 on the basis that it also gives you
an action you can rebarrel in the future to something bigger if needed.
I'm a walnut and blue fan so
Good luck with your purchase.
500 Nitro
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Another vote for the cz 550, I have both a .375 and .416. They both shoot great and the actions are excellent. A magnum length mauser at a good price, it may need a little tweaking but what off the shelf rifle doesn't ??.

I went through the same thing as you in deciding about my .375 and when you look at what you get for the dollars the choice was obvious.

When I get my .458 lott it will be a .458 win mag cz 550 reamed out, wouldn't consider anything else [Cool]
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
don't forget "SIX BULLETS".
 
Posts: 52 | Location: omaha | Registered: 01 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
You may also want to look at the New Model 70
with CRF. There is nothing like the Winchester.
 
Posts: 6935 | Location: hydesville, ca. , USA | Registered: 17 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Another vote for the CZ-550 [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 2362 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Howdy.
I purchased a new M-70 in .375, then went banana's and put about $1900 more into having it 'all done up'. Whew, what a waste. I've sold it now, but have thought about another, and would have definetly gone for the CZ, or BRNO as they have an excellent reputation. (I got the .376 Steyr instead of the H&H). I do have a CZ in .22LR, and it's a tack driver!
Back to the .375... I had my barrel cut down to 20.5 inches, as I wanted a quick draw unit for the Brownies in Alaska. The gunsmith told me that with this length, that I'd only lose 50 fps.
Sure enough, I was getting 2947 fps. w/VVN150 & 250 gr Barnes 'X', and Sierra SBT's. Not bad for a stubby little thing!
So the moral on barrel length on .375? The powder's used up very efficiently, and early. Going short won't hurt a thing!
RC
 
Posts: 15 | Location: Central Idaho | Registered: 02 March 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 470 Mbogo
posted Hide Post
Hi Chuck M,
Why don't you look into the CZ550 and put it into the McMillan stock. They have a model for the 550 that they make for AHR on their site. That would give you the best of both worlds.

470 Mbogo
 
Posts: 1247 | Location: Sechelt B.C. | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RC:
Howdy.
I purchased a new M-70 in .375, then went banana's and put about $1900 more into having it 'all done up'. Whew, what a waste. I've sold it now, but have thought about another, and would have definetly gone for the CZ, or BRNO as they have an excellent reputation. (I got the .376 Steyr instead of the H&H). I do have a CZ in .22LR, and it's a tack driver!
Back to the .375... I had my barrel cut down to 20.5 inches, as I wanted a quick draw unit for the Brownies in Alaska. The gunsmith told me that with this length, that I'd only lose 50 fps.
Sure enough, I was getting 2947 fps. w/VVN150 & 250 gr Barnes 'X', and Sierra SBT's. Not bad for a stubby little thing!
So the moral on barrel length on .375? The powder's used up very efficiently, and early. Going short won't hurt a thing!
RC

I DID the same thing when I got my Model 70 in .375H&H. Had the bbl cut back to 21" and then added a Bruce McArthur brake on it at the same time he 1-mounted the Griffin & Howe top over quick release scope mount and 2- fit it into a McMillan kevlar stock.
The whole package with scope is at 8 pounds and kicks like a .243, or if you shoot it off hand like a pistol, it kicks like a model 19 S&W with hot loads.(used to do that a lot to demo the brake)
I reload and shoot a minimum of 200 rounds a year through it and through playing with powders I can run with the longer bbls with no problems.

I put extra money in mine also, BUT I feel it was worth every penny over the stock rifle.

I have always liked Model 70s but I might have to give one of the CZs a try.
 
Posts: 624 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 07 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Frankly I don't see why anyone would waste good money on any of todays production rifles..A Win. pre-64: an old Fabrique Nationale; or a nice English rifle in 375 H&H is the better gun, better buy and does not devalue the minute you shoot it. You can always get you paying price back with one of these old guns...Lots of them around if you know where to look, and if you don't, then give me a call, I'll find one for you. Another great option is a used Custom Rifle at 25 cents on the dollar and their are a lot of them out there. A good example is Kurt has a 404 Jefferys single square bridge Mauser in classified that could be bought for peanuts, about $3000 I suppose, and that is a bloody damn steal...Replacement on this gun would be over $5500 I assure you, and perhaps much more than that...I see these deals in gunlist all the time.

Buying this new junk, and spending a fortune on it to get it to feed, shoot and work without coming apart is tossing good money after bad...

Been wanting to say that for a long time now its done! [Razz] [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 42321 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
Frankly I don't see why anyone would waste good money on any of todays production rifles..A Win. pre-64: an old Fabrique Nationale; or a nice English rifle in 375 H&H is the better gun, better buy and does not devalue the minute you shoot it. You can always get you paying price back with one of these old guns...Lots of them around if you know where to look, and if you don't, then give me a call, I'll find one for you. Another great option is a used Custom Rifle at 25 cents on the dollar and their are a lot of them out there. A good example is Kurt has a 404 Jefferys single square bridge Mauser in classified that could be bought for peanuts, about $3000 I suppose, and that is a bloody damn steal...Replacement on this gun would be over $5500 I assure you, and perhaps much more than that...I see these deals in gunlist all the time.

Buying this new junk, and spending a fortune on it to get it to feed, shoot and work without coming apart is tossing good money after bad...

Been wanting to say that for a long time now its done! [Razz] [Big Grin]

RIGHT ON RAY! [Big Grin] [Big Grin]

Well said. I feel the same way about Double Rifles.
 
Posts: 6277 | Location: Not Likely, but close. | Registered: 12 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:


Been wanting to say that for a long time now its done! [Razz] [Big Grin]

'A long time' is the period between Mike375's absences on the forums generally. [Wink]

Sorry mate, couldn't resist [Big Grin]

Karl.

[ 04-14-2003, 13:22: Message edited by: Karl ]
 
Posts: 3533 | Location: various | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Stay away from the A-bolt and model 700.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all the advice, even though it wasn't at all what I expected.

I've always purchased my guns with a lot emphasis on the dollars. I guess that's why I have ended up with a bunch of Rugers. It's not junk -IMO- but not anything to brag about either.

The idea of owning a quality hunting rifle is starting to appeal to me. How do I go about finding these rifles for sale?
 
Posts: 23 | Location: Newbury Park, CA | Registered: 17 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Longbob
posted Hide Post
Chuck,

I've got some expensive rifles, some Pre-64's, and two Rugers. One in particular is a 35 Whelen that functions perfectly and out shoots all of my other rifles with factory Federal Premiums! If you have an inexpensive rifle that feeds, functions, and shoots well then you have every right to brag.

It is not a given that the more money you spend, the better rifle you end up with. It should be, but it is not always the case. Sometimes it is just blind luck. I feel the D'arcy Echols and others make excellent rifles. The odds that you are going to get a good one from him are very good. But a dead animal taken with one good clean shot will never know how much you spent on your rifle.
 
Posts: 3512 | Location: Denton, TX | Registered: 01 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Chuck,

Saeed, our host here at AR shoots those funny looking silver and black guns in Africa [Wink] , and has over 500 head of game to his credit. I promis you that if you stick around here long enough you will get a PhD in 375's. Because its the best caliber ever you should spend the most money on it. That might get them going a little.
 
Posts: 1407 | Location: Beverly Hills Ca 90210<---finally :) | Registered: 04 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of CZ 550
posted Hide Post
I vote the cz, especially if you emphasis is on dollars. I have two, one in 375 H&H and one in 416 Rigby. You can't get better for the $.
Andy
 
Posts: 477 | Location: Olyphant Pennsylvania | Registered: 05 September 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
Frankly I don't see why anyone would waste good money on any of todays production rifles..A Win. pre-64: an old Fabrique Nationale; or a nice English rifle in 375 H&H is the better gun,...Lots of them around if you know where to look, and if you don't, then give me a call, I'll find one for you.

[Razz] [Big Grin]

Where do I find the tables at the gun shows that have the piles of these fine old rifles with left handed actions? [Wink]

Sorry, that comes off as a smart ass remark and it is really not intended to be that way, but I just need to speak up for the disadvantaged among us.

However - Ray, sometime in the not too distant future I would love to look over some of these fine old rifles. Jack Belk is going to build me a couple of "classic" rifles based on LH Montana actions - a .30-06 and a .375 H&H. I know how I want the metal work set up but the stocks are driving me crazy, especially the one for the .375. It will have a Blackburn drop box mag and I need to create a pattern to send to a stockmaker. God forgive me, but the Remington M700 BDL stock fits me about as well as anything I've ever tried, but that design would be a no-no on something that is supposed to resemble a pre-war Model 70 Super Grade or fine Express rifle.

Anyway, if it is okay with you then perhaps later on this summer I might call you up or even drive on over (I live in Payette county) and have a chat with you about the features one would need to get a modern rifle fit to my measurements and needs but still look like a fine classic sporter.

[ 04-17-2003, 21:39: Message edited by: Jim in Idaho ]
 
Posts: 1027 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
JIm,
Come on over, between Jack, Jim Brockmon and seld we have some of the nicest pattern stocks you'll likely see anywhere...and they will suit you much better than a 700 stock...most stocks have way to much wood left on them when they are finished...
 
Posts: 42321 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Chuck,
The Ruger or the CZ is your best bet for a factory rifle, other than a pre 64 M-70 used Winchester, but price comes into play with the pre 64......If you like the Ruger then go for it, it is a fine rifle for a factory gun..
 
Posts: 42321 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I would really like to take the time to research, find, and purchase an older or custom rifle. But the reality is the $10k that I need for next July's trip to RSA is not going to let me do that. Much easier to come up with the $700.00 to $1500.00 needed for a CZ or Ruger. So right now, money is the limiting factor, maybe in a few years I can upgrade.
Just hope my kids don't want to go off to an Ivy League school [Eek!]
Chuck.
 
Posts: 23 | Location: Newbury Park, CA | Registered: 17 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Chuck,
In reality pick the rifle you like between a Ruger, CZ, or Model 70, have the trigger adjusted and maybe a bedding job, put a good scope on it and go hunting. As much as we like to argue every detail of rifles to within a knats ass the truth is there are many servicable rifles available and from a pure cost standpoint that is probably your best bet. What Ray is describing is the best VALUE option. Your choice. One thing to consider is the old quote that "quality is a poor mans best friend". Good luck.

Jeff
 
Posts: 784 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 18 December 2000Reply With Quote
<JBelk>
posted
Chuck M---

I feel the CZ-550 is the VERY best bargain in the gun world right now, with the Montana 99 action running a very tight second.

You should be able to alter a CZ to your liking or build one on a Montana for about the same dollars. Either way you'll have twice the rifle you'd have with something else.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Heritage Arms
posted Hide Post
My choices are as follows they are the .375's we have had least problems with these guns in Africa. This is our most popular gun and caliber combonation for Africa:

Blaser R 93 .375 H&H
Sauer 202
Winchester M 70 pre 64 (old guns)
Weatherby DGR ( US Made)

The biggest problem we have with ALL long action guns is clients not pulling the bolt all the way back for the second shot.

I like the CZ and the new Winchester however you pay $ 850 for the gun and then put another 850 in in to make it serviceable. The stocks and sights are so ugly on the new Winchesters their goes more money into restocking.

However I had a new Westley and Richards that had a crooked front sight.

The best shooting .375 H&H I have owned is a Blaser R 93 and a very custom Winchester Safari Express.

Do not spend too much time on this whole subject buy Quality, buy it once, shoot it. The whole debate over Controlled feed or push feed is way overblown. 99% of the problems I have seen have been CLIENT caused not a mechanical malfuntion. The exception is one 700 rem that I can remember.

The most expensive scope is more fragile than the basic design of most push feeds any way!

Aleko
 
Posts: 1573 | Location: USA, most of the time  | Registered: 11 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MADDOG
posted Hide Post
A gun shop up the road has a Kimber of Oregon 375 H&H. It is a Grade 2???? What ever that is. The Quality seams super. Any opinions???
Is it a control feed ?? I didn't notice, mainly because I couldn't get pass the price tag. $2200.00
Thanks Maddog

[ 04-19-2003, 09:03: Message edited by: MADDOG ]
 
Posts: 1899 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 03 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Heritage Arms
posted Hide Post
We had two out of a collection. I did not like the comb of the stock. Shooting the gun with iron sights was not pleasant. Accuray was good but not great. The ones we had were Kimber of Oregon and thry were controlled feed.

Aleko

[ 04-19-2003, 20:06: Message edited by: Heritage Arms ]
 
Posts: 1573 | Location: USA, most of the time  | Registered: 11 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Researching .375 H&amp;H rifles.

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia