Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
I wonder if any forumites can offer any suggestions as to how to develop loads for the 585 Nyati with 900 grain bullets. There is data on Saeed's site for both the 750 grain jacketed bullet and the 1200 grain cast. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how to start developing for the 900 grain jacketed slug? Data for the 750 grain jacketed is as follows: from 140 to 156 grains of IMR 4350 giving 2125 to 2310 fps. Data for the 1200 grain cast bullet is as follows: from 100 to 110 grains of IMR 4350 giving 1550 to 1570 fps. For the 900 grainer, I was thinking of starting at 120 grains of IMR 4350 and working up possibly to 140 or 145 grains. | ||
|
<Mitch> |
500 grains, I reduced the powder charge 15.0 grains under what I was using for 750 gr. bullets in my t.rex. when I developed 900 grain loads for my t.rex. This is more reduction than nessesary but it is better to be on the safe side. You could also go to a slower burning powder(such as RL. 19) with the heavier bullets in the Nyati. Don, The Nyati case holds 183.0 to 185.0 grains of water, trim lenth is 2.790. [This message has been edited by Mitch (edited 06-13-2001).] | ||
One of Us |
Don G., Thanks for the modeling! | |||
|
<Don G> |
Mitch, Can you tell me what the cartridge overall length is? And I forgot I needed bullet length and barrel length. If anyone has the barrel length and bullet lengths for the 750 and 1200 grain bullets that Saeed used I can test my model. Don [This message has been edited by Don G (edited 06-13-2001).] | ||
<Don G> |
500grains, One SLIGHT computer glitch, when I revised the bullet weight to 900 grains in the custom bullet definition, the program updated the file, but not the setting it was using. That was a long 750 grain bullet, not a 900 grain bullet. The revised numbers are (I hope) more nearly correct. Remember this is speculative BS only for comparison purposes, etc, etc. QuickLoad does best with bottleneck cases, so you will probably get both lower pressures and lower velocities, but start 10% below these loads and work up. Remember when you see pressure signs you are probably already at 65,000-70,000 PSI. I used Saeed's barrel length of 23.5 inches. I am emailing this also, as it might be easier to read. If it was me, I'd try H4350. I like the fact that the H4350 uses a compressed caseful (keeps the bullet from seating itself deeper due to recoil while in the magazine), and is close to 100% burnt. [This message has been edited by Don G (edited 06-13-2001).] | ||
<Mitch> |
Don, The lenth of the 750 Barnes Super Solid is 1.450 the lenth of the 900 gr. Woodleigh is 1.400. The cannelure on the 900 gr. bullet is really too far foward, if you seat the bullet to the cannelure the overall lenth would be about 3.390 which is about .100 less than it should be with other bullets. I could not find the 585 Nyati case that I have, so I seated the bullet in one of my t.rex cases and then subtracted the .190 extra lenth of the t.rex. case. I hope this helps. | ||
<Don G> |
Mitch, I extrapolated the 900 grain to be 1.445, so I should be close enough. Thanks, | ||
<R. A. Berry> |
Very interesting guys. The 585 Nyati can be a real dinosaur gun with the 900 grainers, if Don G's data is anywhere near close. I will have to put thoughts of the 510 Nyati away and go back to the standard 585 Nyati. ------------------ | ||
<Don G> |
If you are still alive, and your brains don't pour out your nose after shooting one of these, let me know how the actual data turns out. Any resemblance to reality is purely coincidental! Don | ||
one of us |
Dear 500grains: Please arrange for your next of kin to post your loads to this board! Man, if you get the velocities predicted by that modelling that is going to be some recoil in a heavy rifle! Please keep us informed... jpb | |||
|
One of Us |
I store these threads so I can re read them before shooting my 375s at the range Mike | |||
|
<Don G> |
I had the model messed up. When I loaded the program to check the run this morning I got completely different numbers! It turns out the program was still using the old bullet weight of 750 grains last night, even though I'd updated the bullet definition file properly. When I reloaded the program the new number (900 grains) actually took effect. If you had used the old run of 154 grains XMR4350 you'd have actually gotten 56,000 PSI. Just a minor computer glitch, eh? Don | ||
One of Us |
Mitch, > "I reduced the powder charge 15.0 grains under what I was using for 750 gr. bullets in my t.rex. Did you choose that as a 10% reduction of the powder charge, or how? | |||
|
One of Us |
Don, That's some impressive data, but I worry about starting anywhere near those loads. Will the software let you stipulate a max PSI? For example, if I wanted to limit my max pressure to 45,000 PSI, what would my charge of IMR 4350 or H 4350? I am putting the data you modeled in my reloading notebook. Thanks! | |||
|
<Don G> |
500grains, You can see from these numbers that 10% down from the first batch is lower than this. I would start 10% down from the first batch. I would not run any load less than 80% of a full case. H4350 is still looking good to me. Don 23.5 inch barrel, 900 grain bullet 1.445" Type mc (gr) fill (%) vel (fps) Pmax (psi) Burnt (%) t (ms) Pmuz (psi) [This message has been edited by Don G (edited 06-14-2001).] | ||
One of Us |
Don, that is very helpful. I remain surprised that such heavy powder charges would be used with the 900 grain bullet. Comparing the data for the 750 grain bullet, we see a max load of 156 grains of IMR4350 giving 2310 fps. A starting load with a 750 is 140 grains at 2125 fps. With a 900 grain bullet, 148 grains of IMR4350 would give 2143 fps at max pressure, while 140 grains gives 2042 fps. It seems that the extra 150 grains of bullet weight in the 900 grainer is not that hard to get up to high velocity (2100 fps), per the model. | |||
|
One of Us |
Don, Is that modeling software available on the net? | |||
|
<Mitch> |
500 grains, when I reduced the powder charge 15.0 grains I was not thinking of a particular percentage of reduction. I just chose to drop the charge 15.0 grain because I was sure the load would be a very safe place to start. The reason for such a large reduction was prompted by my concerns about going over board with too much bolt head thrust. [This message has been edited by Mitch (edited 06-14-2001).] | ||
<Don G> |
500grains, You can get the software from NECO Last I knew it was about $150. I have not tried the other internal ballistics programs, this one does fairly well. It is always best to use data based on experience, I mostly use QuickLoad to help me choose which powder to buy. I based the model on Saeed's published 750 grain data, so I had a good starting point, but I'd still put more weight in Mitch's experience and Saeed's data than on QuickLoad. By the way, I still get the same answers this motning! Don | ||
one of us |
Sorry about the cannelure.I had them designed to allow feeding with my longer case in the CZ magazine,at which time I was not sure just how long the case was going to be. - I played it safe and stuck with the same OAL as for the other woodleigh 585 bullets. My gunsmith recommended 140gns of AR2209 which is bit slower than IMR4350 for the 900 grainers to start with.My case is a bit larger at 195-200 grains. Mike I guess you will looking at getting a few too? Don, with 750grain woodleighs and the above powder capacity,what would be maximum velocity with IMR4350? [This message has been edited by Karl (edited 06-16-2001).] | |||
|
<Don G> |
Karl, That case is quite a bit bigger! Using 197 gr case capacity and the 750 gr. Woodleigh, QL predicts an even 2400 fps at 166 grains of H4350. Peak pressure is predicted to ne 52,500 PSI. If you have it available to try, the Somchem S365 also looks good at 164 grains, same fps, slightly lower pressure. The IMR4350 prediction was 2358 fps from 160 grains at 52,500 peak pressure. Please remember, QuickLoad is a nice tool, it has saved me hundreds of dollars by putting me on the right powder quickly, but it does not do a good job on these big cases with small shoulders. Almost every time I have needed 3-5 grains more powder to get the predicted velocity out of my 416Rem. I believe that once you load up to get the predicted velocity, you are also at (at least) the predicted pressure. So there is no "free" velocity. An exception is when you shove the bullet into the lands. Peak pressure will go up faster than the velocity would indicate. These models use a start pressure based on a reasonable bullet jump - at least .005. If you have actual data, no matter how far off from these predictions, please post it or send it to me. It helps to know when the model is wrong, and in which direction! Don | ||
<Don G> |
Karl, 3 grains of added case capacity does not mean much at 200 total! For the 750 gr. Woodleigh my model showed 2440 fps at 167gr H4350, other powders went up roughly the same perecentage. H414 looks pretty good also, 165 gr gets 2424 fps. But I'm not sure even a magnum primer would do a good job of lighting off that much ball powder. Mike 375 told me that ADI AR2209 is the same as H4350SC, if that is true, my model shows 168 gr H4350SC yielding 2384 fps. That is not too shabby, but that is a 5% compressed load, so in actuality you will probably run out of case room before you get to 2400 fps. I'd use a long drop tube! As always, work up carefully - these big cases never model well. Let me know your range results. Don | ||
<Mitch> |
I would avoid ball powders in the 585 Nyati. I tried ball powder in my 500 A2 and got extreme spreads of nearly 200 fps. In the much larger 585 Nyati 3.0 case the problem would be even worse. | ||
<Don G> |
Mitch, I was afraid of that. You going to make it to GeorgeS's dinner? Don | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia